745
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Use of primary health care services and mortality in older patients with type 2 diabetes with or without comorbidities

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 392-399 | Received 15 May 2023, Accepted 30 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023

References

  • Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, et al. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes – global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;10(1):107–111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001.
  • Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):549–562. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7.
  • GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
  • Miao K, Wang Y, Cao W, et al. Trends in incidence of total or type 2 diabetes: systematic review. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2023;366:1–8.
  • Bigio J, MacLean E, Vasquez NA, et al. Most common reasons for primary care visits in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(5):e0000196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000196.
  • Wändell P, Carlsson AC, Wettermark B, et al. Most common diseases diagnosed in primary care in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2011. Fam Pract. 2013;30(5):506–513. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt033.
  • Mash B, Fairall L, Adejayan O, et al. A morbidity survey of South African primary care. PLOS One. 2012;7(3):e32358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032358.
  • Soler JK, Okkes I, Oskam S, et al. An international comparative family medicine study of the transition project data from The Netherlands, Malta and Serbia. Is family medicine an international discipline? Comparing incidence and prevalence rates of reasons for encounter and diagnostic titles of episodes of care across populations. Fam Pract. 2012;29(3):283–298. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr098.
  • Davidson JA. The increasing role of primary care physicians in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(12):S3–S4. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0466.
  • Hauhio N, Puroharju T, Mölläri K. Perusterveyden-huollon avosairaanhoidon vastaanoton asiakkaiden käyntisyyt vuonna 2020 [Reasons for visits by clients of primary health care outpatient clinics in 2020]. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2021. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042820667
  • Aro AK, Karjalainen M, Tiihonen M, et al. Use of primary health care services among older patients with and without diabetes. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01844-2.
  • Weng W, Liang Y, Kimball ES, et al. Longitudinal changes in medical services and related costs in a single cohort of patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, 2006 to 2012. Clin Ther. 2016;38(6):1314–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.032.
  • Sabale U, Bodegård J, Sundström J, et al. Healthcare utilization and costs following newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes in Sweden: a follow-up of 38,956 patients in a clinical practice setting. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015;9(5):330–337. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.01.001.
  • van Dijk CE, Hoekstra T, Verheij RA, et al. Type II diabetes patients in primary care: profiles of healthcare utilization obtained from observational data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-7.
  • Zghebi SS, Steinke DT, Rutter MK, et al. Eleven-year multimorbidity burden among 637 255 people with and without type 2 diabetes: a population-based study using primary care and linked hospitalisation data. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e033866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033866.
  • Hodgson S, Morgan-Harrisskitt J, Hounkpatin H, et al. Primary care service utilisation and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e054654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054654.
  • Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): population structure [e-publication] [Internet]. Statistics Finland; 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/index.html
  • Keskimaki I, Tynkkynen LK, Reissell E, et al. Finland: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2019;21(2):1–166.
  • Krakau I. Trends in use of health care services in Swedish primary care district. A ten year perspective. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;10(1):66–71. doi: 10.3109/02813439209014038.
  • Hannikainen K. Ikääntyneiden sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluiden tarve ja käyttö eroavat tulotason mukaan [The need and use of social and health services in the elderly differs according to income level]. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare; 2018. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-067-9
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. [Database] doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
  • Fe H. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York (NY): Springer; 2001.
  • Lehto M, Mustonen K, Raina M, et al. Differences between recorded diagnoses of patients of an emergency department and office-hours primary care doctors: a register-based study in a Finnish town. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2021;80(1):1935593.
  • Abner S, Gillies CL, Shabnam S, et al. Consultation rates in people with type 2 diabetes with and without vascular complications: a retrospective analysis of 141,328 adults in England. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01435-y.
  • Coles B, Zaccardi F, Seidu S, et al. Rates and estimated cost of primary care consultations in people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and comorbidities: a retrospective analysis of 8.9 million consultations. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(6):1301–1310. doi: 10.1111/dom.14340.
  • Mehta S, Ghosh S, Sander S, et al. Differences in all-cause health care utilization and costs in a type 2 diabetes mellitus population with and without a history of cardiovascular disease. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(3):280–290.
  • Lay-Flurrie S, Mathieu E, Bankhead C, et al. Patient consultation rate and clinical and NHS outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of English Primary Care Data from 2.7 million patients in 238 practices. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4036-y.
  • Kauppila T, Eriksson JG, Honkasalo M, et al. Relationship between number of contacts between previous dropouts with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals on glycaemic control: a cohort study in public primary health care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019;13(5):468–473. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.03.003.
  • Georgescu V, Green A, Jensen PB, et al. Primary care visits can reduce the risk of potentially avoidable hospitalizations among persons with diabetes in France. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(6):1056–1061. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa137.