The durability of previous examinations for cancer: Danish nationwide cohort study

References

• Lung cancer: diagnosis and management. NICE; 2019. Updated september 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Banks M, Graham D, Jansen M, et al. British society of gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2019;68(9):1545–1575. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris EJ, Rutter MD, Finan PJ, et al. Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service. Gut. 2015;64(8):1248–1256. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K, et al. Bladder cancer: a review. JAMA. 2020;324(19):1980–1991. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai CJ, Al-Mubarak G, Homer MJ, et al. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):850–855. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2710-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014;63(6):949–956. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haastrup PF, Jarbøl DE, Balasubramaniam K, et al. Predictive values of lung cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020;30(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0173-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Haastrup PF, Balasubramaniam K, et al. Predictive values of colorectal cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2019;120(6):595–600. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0385-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, et al. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen JS, Olivarius Nde F, Krasnik A. The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):34–37. doi: 10.1177/1403494810394718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):42–45. doi: 10.1177/1403494810393562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer diagnostic- and follow-up programs - concepts, time limits and monitoring [In Danish]. Danish Board of Health. 2018. [cited Accessed 2023 May 5].https://www.sst.dk/∼/media/028409D2A0F94772B19868ABEF06B626.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• Dyba T, Randi G, Bray F, et al. The european cancer burden in 2020: incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers. Eur J Cancer. 2021;157:308–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen H, Tørring ML, Olesen F, et al. Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):636. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen CG, Lykkegaard J, Accessed May 5, et al. Audit on early diagnosis of cancer in general practice. Audit Projekt Odense, University of Southern Denmark. 2018. https://www.apo-danmark.dk/_files/ugd/43637f_e0a641d6c4c747d9ac5a706dbdc9f15e.pdf. [In Danish]
   Google Scholar
• Danckert B, Falborg AZ, Christensen NL, et al. Routes to diagnosis and the association with the prognosis in patients with cancer - a nationwide register-based ­cohort study in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021;74:101983. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen J, Højsgaard Schmidt LK, Kejs AMT, et al. Agreement between the Danish Cancer Registry and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(1):116–123. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1669815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298–1306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Hang D, Wu K, et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(4):852–861.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon S, Trudgill N. How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2014;2(2):E46–50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherratt MJ, McConnell JC, Streuli CH. Raised mammographic density: causative mechanisms and biological consequences. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0701-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen H, Nissen A, Vedsted P. Quality deviations in cancer diagnosis: prevalence and time to diagnosis in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(619):e92-8–e98. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen H, Sperling C, Sandager M, et al. Agreement between patients and general practitioners on quality deviations during the cancer diagnostic pathway and associations with time to diagnosis. Fam Pract. 2015;32(3):329–335. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njor SH, Søborg B, Tranberg M, et al. Concurrent participation in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes in Denmark: a nationwide registry-based study. Prev Med. 2022;167:107405. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Mendonca SC, Abel GA, et al. Variation in ‘fast-track’ referrals for suspected cancer by patient characteristic and cancer diagnosis: evidence from 670 000 patients with cancers of 35 different sites. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(1):24–31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samadder NJ, Pappas L, Boucherr KM, et al. Long-term colorectal cancer incidence After negative colonoscopy in the state of Utah: the effect of family history. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(9):1439–1447. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Turner D, Xue L, et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA. 2006;295(20):2366–2373. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar