Adjudications and tinkering with care for socially vulnerable patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice

References

• Diderichsen F, Andersen I, Manuel C. Ulighed i sundhed - årsager og indsatser. [Inequality in health - reasons and interventions]. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lau CJ, Lykke M, Andreasen AH, et al. Sundhedsprofil 2013 – kronisk sygdom. [Health profile 2013- Chronic disease]. Forskningscenter for Forebyggelse og Sundhed, Region Hovedstaden: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer SW, Watt GCM. The inverse care law: clinical primary care encounters in deprived and affluent areas of Scotland. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(6):503–510. doi: 10.1370/afm.778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapager I, Olsen KR, Vrangbæk K. Exploring equity in accessing diabetes management treatment: a healthcare gap analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114550. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio N, Varanka-Ruuska T, Vaaramo E, et al. Accumulated exposure to unemployment is related to impaired glucose metabolism in Middle-aged men: a follow-up of the Northern Finland birth cohort 1966. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(4):365–372. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrañaga I, Arteagoitia JM, Rodriguez JL, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular riskfactors and chronic diabetic complications in the Basque Country, Spain. Diabet Med. 2005;22(8):1047–1053. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01598.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard EM, Vedsted P, Fenger-Gron M, et al. Socioeconomic position and contact to general practice among persons with diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2012;6(4):313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen KS, Rasmussen PCA. [Who participate and who do not participate in patient education. Evaluation of disease specific patient education in The Capital Region]. Hvem deltager og hvem deltager ikke i patientuddannelse. Evaluering af sygdomsspecifik patientuddannelse Region Hovedstaden. København: KORA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Health TNBo. Chronic disease management - a national strategy. Disease management programmes and self-management support. Copenhagen: National Board of Health; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeld SG, Brautsch LAS, Svartá DL, et al. Social ulighed i mødet med sundhedsvæsenet - en systematisk litteraturgennemgang. [Social inequity in health encounters - a systematic review]. Report by National Institute of Public Health. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meijer M, Engholm G, Grittner U, et al. A socioeconomic deprivation index for small areas in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(6):560–569. doi: 10.1177/1403494813483937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol A. The logic of care. Health and the problem of patient choice. London, New York: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statens Institut for Folkesundhed. Danskernes Sundhed [Health of the Danes]. Copenhagen; Statens Institut for Folkesundhed, 2021. Danskernessundhed.dk – Sukkersyge/diabetes. Available at: https://proxy.danskernessundhed.dk/SASVisualAnalyticsViewer/VisualAnalyticsViewer_guest.jsp?reportName=Diabetes&reportPath=/Produktion/Danskernes_Sundhed/. Accessed 30-06-2022, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Krämer HU, Rüter G, Schöttker B, et al. Gender differences in healthcare utilization of patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(7):362–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen MT, Due TD, Hølge-Hazelton B, et al. ‘More constricting than inspiring’ – GPs find chronic care programmes of limited clinical utility. A qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2018;2(2):bjgpopen18X101591. Jul doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dansk Selskab for Almen Medicin [The Danish College of General practitioners]. Type 2 diabetes – opfølgning og behandling [Type 2 diabetes – follow-up and treatment]. Guideline, 2019. https://vejledninger.dsam.dk/media/files/19/diabetes-b-laminatark-184x254mm_4korr.pdf. Accessed 30-06-2022, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Hansen LJ, Siersma V, Beck-Nielsen H, et al. Structured personal care of type 2 diabetes: a 19 year follow-up of the study diabetes care in general practice (DCGP). Diabetologia. 2013;56(6):1243–1253. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2893-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwennesen N, Henriksen JE, Willaing I. Patient explanations for non-attendance at type 2 diabetes self-management education: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(1):187–192. doi: 10.1111/scs.12245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilou FE, Christoffersen NB, Pedersen PV, et al. Socially differentiated cardiac rehabilitation: can we improve referral, attendance and adherence among patients with first myocardial infarction? Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(3):14034948231224239–14034948231224293. doi: 10.1177/14034948231224239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar