Good cancer follow-up for socially disadvantaged patients in general practice? Perspectives from patients and general practitioners

References

• Phillips JL, Currow DC. Cancer as a chronic disease. Collegian. 2010;17(2):47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2010.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen H, Vedsted P. Exploration of the possible effect on survival of lead-time associated with implementation of cancer patient pathways among symptomatic first-time cancer patients in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;49:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Health Authority. 2015. New Follow-up Programs for Cancer. Available at: https://www.sst.dk/da/Nyheder/2015/Nye-opfoelgningsprogrammer-for-kraeft. (accessed 21 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Friderichsen B, Weibull A, Jensen AN, et al. Cancer Follow-up in General Practice - Clinical Guidelines for General Practice. 1st ed. The Danish College for General Practitioners; 2019. Available at: https://www.dsam.dk/vejledninger/cancer. (accessed 21 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Meiklejohn JA, Mimery A, Martin JH, et al. The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(6):990–1011. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0545-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sele Sætre LM, Nicolaisen A, Søndergaard J, et al. Mapping of Cancer Follow-up and Palliation in General Practice 2021. The Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark; Odense; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen RS and Tørring ML (eds). Cancer entangled: acceleration, anticipation and the danish state. Rutgers University Press; New Jersey; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Merrild CH. Cancer, inequality, and expectations of sameness. In: Andersen RS and Tørring ML (eds), Cancer entangled: anticipation, dissonance and the danish state. Rutgers University Press, pp. 78–95; New Jersey; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, et al. Time from incident primary cancer until recurrence or second primary cancer: risk factors and impact in general practice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(5):e13123. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton SO, Schüz J, Engholm G, et al. Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003: summary of findings. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(14):2074–2085. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovaldt HB, Suppli NP, Olsen MH, et al. Who are the cancer survivors? A nationwide study in Denmark, 1943-2010. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(9):1549–1553. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton SO, Halgren Olsen M, Moustsen IR, et al. Socioeconomic position, referral and attendance to rehabilitation after a cancer diagnosis: a population-based study in copenhagen, Denmark 2010–2015. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(5):730–736. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1582800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen MH, Kjær TK, So D. White Paper. Social Inequality in Cancer in Denmark. 1st ed. Copenhagen: Danish Cancer Society; 2019. Available at: https://www.cancer.dk/dyn/resources/File/file/6/7826/1581589964/hvidbog_social_ulighed_kraeft_i_danmark.pdf. (accessed 21 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen PV, Ingholt L, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. When you’ve said A, you must also say B: on social inequality in cancer rehabilitation. National Institute of Public Health; Copenhagen; 2015. Available at: https://www.sdu.dk/da/sif/rapporter/2015/naar_man_har_sagt_a_maa_man_ogsaa_sige_b (accessed 21 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen RS, Offersen SH, Merrild CH. Noisy bodies and cancer diagnostics in Denmark. Exploring the social life of medical semiotics. In: Bennett LR, Manderson L, and Spagnoletti B (eds) Cancer and politics of care: inequalities and interventions in a global perspective. UCL Press; London; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Merrild CH, Andersen RS. Disengaging with the cancerous body. Health: Sage Journals 1–16; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish College for General Practitioners. Milestones for the field of general medicine; 2016. Available at: https://www.dsam.dk/presse-holdninger/pejlemaerker. (accessed 21 September 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson JA, Beich A, Stavdal A. Our core values will endure. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(4):363–366. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1842676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm LV, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, et al. Social inequality in cancer rehabilitation: a population-based cohort study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(2):410–422. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.745014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman Altamira, Lanham, Maryland; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kitto SC, Chresters J, Grbich C. Quality in qualitative research - Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the medical journal of Australia. Qual Res Health Care. 2008;188(4):243–246.
   Google Scholar
• Offersen SMH, Vedsted P, Andersen RS. ‘The good citizen’ balancing moral possibilities. In Everyday Life between Sensation, Symptom and Healthcare Seeking. 2017;24(1):6–12. Anthropology in Action doi: 10.3167/aia.2017.240102.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad M. The art of social relations: essays on culture, social action and everyday life in modern Norway. Oxford: oxford University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen RS, Offersen SMH. The moral pioneers of care: solo living in the context of cancer care. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom Og Samfund - J Res Sickness Soc. 2022;37:65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. ‘When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me’ - The role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer - A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guassora AD, Jarlbaek L, Thorsen T. Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):202. (doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0856-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adam R, Watson E. The role of primary care in supporting patients living with and beyond cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(3):261–267. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druel V, Gimenez L, Paricaud K, et al. Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06993-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathanapally H, Sidhu M, Fahami R, et al. Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2)2020:e033445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arreskov AB, Graungaard AH, Kristensen MT, et al. Life goes on… patient perspectives on having a cancer diagnosis and other comorbid diseases: a qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2021;17(1):17–28. doi: 10.1177/1742395318815954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Cour K, Hansen HP. Aesthetic engagements: ‘being’ in everyday life with advanced cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29(2):126–133. doi: 10.1177/1049909111413117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun MH, Krøijer S, Rytter M. Initial perspectives. The state of change and the society of independence. J Anthropol (Tidsskriftet Antropologi). 2016;72:11–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jønsson ABR, Spalletta O. Tuning the self: revisiting health inequities through the lens of social interaction. Ethos. 2023;51(3):237–254. doi: 10.1111/etho.12388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren H, Trägårdh L. Social trust and radical individualism. The paradox at the heart of nordic capitalism. The Nordic Way: equality, Individuality and Social Trust. 2012; 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K.F, Pérez I.A. ‘Hard-to-reach’? Meanings at the margins of care and risk in cancer research. In: Bennett LR, Manderson L, and Spagnoletti B (eds) Cancer and politics of care: inequalities and interventions in a global perspective. UCL Press; London; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton SO, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C. Rehabilitation of ­cancer patients: needed, but how? Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):163–166. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.550315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar