References
- Wilson MR. Epidemiological features of glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1990;30:153–60.
- Sponse11 WE. Tonometry in question. Can visual screening tests play a more decisive role in glaucoma diagnosis and management? Surv Ophthalmol 1989;33:291–300.
- Hitchings RA. Screening for glaucoma (editorial). BMJ 1986;292:505–6.
- Christoffersen T, Holtedahl K, Fors T, Ringberg U. Tonometry in the general practice setting (II): which cut-off point for referral - for which patients? Acta Ophthal-mol 1993;71:109–13.
- Christoffersen T, Fors T, Waage S, Holtedahl K. Glau-coma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: Is its specificity acceptable? Eye 1995;9:36–9.
- Leydhecker W. The intraocular pressure. Clinical aspects. Ann Ophthalmol 1976;8:389–99.
- Armaly MF. Schiotz tonometer calibration and applana-tion tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 1960;64:226–32.
- Bengtson B. Comparison of Schiotz and Goldmann tonometry in a population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1972;50:445–56.
- Armstrong TA. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pul-sair tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:716–20.
- Frenckel RE, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:750–3.
- Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, Heuer DK, Quillen-Thomas B, Walonker AF, Weiner J. Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tono-Pen. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:168–73.
- Farrar SM, Miller KN, Shilds MB, Stoup CM. An evalua-tion of the Tono-Pen for the measurement of diurnal intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:411–6.
- Middelfart A, Wiggers A. Clinical comparison of the Pro Ton and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann appla-nation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:895–8.
- Christoffersen T, Fors T, Ringberg U, Holtedahl K. Tonometry in the general practice setting (I): Tono-Pen compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol 1993;71:103–8.
- Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Statistics with confidence. Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ, 1989.
- Bland M, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–10.