Effects of decomposed leaf litter mixtures from Platycladus orientalis and broadleaf tree species on soil properties

References

• Aerts R, Decaluwe H. 1997. Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of carex species. Ecology 78:244–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez S, Guerrero MC. 2000. Enzymatic activities associated with decomposition of particulate organic matter in two shallow ponds. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1941–1951.10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00170-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao SD. 2000. Soil agricultural chemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair JM, Parmelee RW, Beare MH. 1990. Decay rates, nitrogen fluxes, and decomposer communities of single and mixed species foliar litter. Ecology 71:1976–1985.10.2307/1937606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneval NJ, Montagnini F. 2002. Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species. Forest Ecol Manag 163:217–227.10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00581-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Díez P, Fierro-Brunnenmeister N, González-Muñoz N, Gallardo A. 2012. Effects of exotic and native tree leaf litter on soil properties of two contrasting sites in the Iberian Peninsula. Plant soil 350:179–191.10.1007/s11104-011-0893-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EM, Shi SQ, Liu JF, Cheng TL, Xue L, Yang XY, Yang WJ, Lan Q, Jiang ZP. 2012. Selection of reference genes for quantitative gene expression studies in Platycladus orientalis (Cupressaceae) using real-time PCR. PLoS ONE 7:1–10.10.1371/annotation/5b9b681e-0744-4064-8b57-ed4390b3ce6f
   Google Scholar
• Cheng LJ, Xue QH. 2000. Microbiology experiment technology. Beijing: The World Publish Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Criquet S, Farnet AM, Tagger S, Le Petit J. 2000. Annual variations of phenoloxidase activities in an evergreen oak litter: influence of certain biotic and abiotic factors. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1505–1513.10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00027-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marco A, Meola A, Maisto G, Giordano M, De Santo AV. 2011. Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on decomposition of leaf litters in a Mediterranean maquis. Plant Soil. 344:305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didham RK. 1998. Altered leaf-litter decomposition rates in tropical forest fragments. Oecologia 116:397–406.10.1007/s004420050603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan SY. 1986. Soil enzyme and its research methods. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guariguata MR, Rheingans R, Montagnini F. 1995. Early woody invasion under tree plantations in Costa Rica: implications for forest restoration. Restor Ecol 3:252–260.10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo ZJ, Song XD, Zhao HG. 2007. Biomass and soil characteristics of Hippophae Rhamnoides and Platycladus Oriental is mixed forest and its root system distribution. Bull Soil Water Conservat 27:18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson K, Olsson BA, Olsson M, Johansson U, Kleja DB. 2011. Differences in soil properties in adjacent stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch in SW Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag 262:522–530.10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattenschwiler S, Vitousek PM. 2000. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 15:238–243.10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01861-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu YL, Wang SL, Huang Y, Yu XJ. 2005. Effects of litter chemistry on soil biological property and enzymatic activity. Acta Ecol Sin 25:2662–2668.
   Google Scholar
• Huang CY. 2000. Soil science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hui D, Jackson RB. 2009. Assessing interactive responses in litter decomposition in mixed species litter. Plant Soil 314:263–271.10.1007/s11104-008-9726-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty MJ. 2006. The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecol Manag 233:195–204.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbruch C, Helfrich M, Flessa H. 2012. Effects of beech (Fagus sylvatica), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and lime (Tilia spec.) on soil chemical properties in a mixed deciduous forest. Plant Soil 352:389–403.10.1007/s11104-011-1004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecerf A, Risnoveanu G, Popescu C, Gessner MO, Chauvet E. 2007. Decomposition of diverse litter mixtures in streams. Ecology 88:219–227.10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[219:DODLMI]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XS, Chen ZZ. 2010. Correctly using SPSS software for principal components analysis. Statistic Res 27:105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Liu ZW, Duan EJ, LiuZhuo MJ, Feng SY. 2009. Soil polarization under pure stands of different tree varieties in semi-arid hilly areas of the Loess Plateau. Acta Pedol Sin 46:1110–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Liu ZW, Gao WJ, Pan KW, Zhang LP, Du HX, Gao XB. 2007. Influences of soil mixing of different forests on the biochemical characteristics and litter decomposition on upper reach of Minjiang River. Acta Ecol Sin 27:4149–4156.10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60011-6
   Google Scholar
• Polyakova O, Billor N. 2007. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. Forest Ecol Manag 253:11–18.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KS, Maikhuri RK, Saxena KG. 1999. Participatory approach to rehabilitation of degraded forest land: a case study in high altitude village of Indian Himalaya. Int Tree Crops J 10:1–17.10.1080/01435698.1999.9752988
   Google Scholar
• Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P. 2005. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecology 8:811–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhi-Moghaddam E, Hosseini SM, Ebrahimi E, Tabari M, Rahmani A. 2008. Comparison of growth, nutrition and soil properties of pure stands of Quercus castaneifolia and mixed with Zelkova carpinifolia in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Forest Ecol Manag 255:1149–1160.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song FQ, Fan XX, Song RQ. 2010. Review of mixed forest litter decomposition researches. Acta Ecol Sin 30:221–225.10.1016/j.chnaes.2010.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Song XD, Luo WX, Hou L. 1995. The benefits in the Hippophae Rhamnoides mixed with Platycladus Oriental stands. J Soil Water 9:113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Song Q, McComb A, Bell R, Davis J. 2005. Leaf-litter application to a sandy soil modifies phosphorus leaching over the wet season of southwestern Australia. Hydrobiologia 545:33–43.10.1007/s10750-005-1826-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Liu GB, Xue, S. 2012. Effect of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) on soil chemical and microbiological properties in the eroded hilly area of China's Loess Plateau. Environ Earth Sci 65:597–607.10.1007/s12665-011-1107-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O, Gallet C. 2003. Determinants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem 35:827–835.10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00118-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue ZD, Liang YM, Yang G. 2000. Study on theory and technique for the mixed plantation of Platycladus orientalis and Amorpha fruticos. Res Soil Water Conservat 7:140–142.
   Google Scholar
• Yang WQ, Wang KY. 2004. Advances in forest soil enzymology. Sci Silva Sin 40:152–159.
   Google Scholar