Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland

References

• Alvesson M, Ashcraft KL, Robyn T. 2008. Identity matters: reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization. 15:5–28. 10.1177/1350508407084426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asatryan VS, Oh H. 2008. Psychological ownership theory: an exploratory application in the restaurant industry. J Hosp Tour Res. 32:363–386. 10.1177/1096348008317391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin ME, Kaplan R. 2004. Identity, involvement, and expertise in the inner city: some benefits of tree-planting projects. In: Clayton S, Opotow S, editors. Identity and the natural environment. Cambridge: MIT Press; p. 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Avey JB, Avolio B, Crossley C, Luthans F. 2009. Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes. J Organ Behav. 30:173–191. 10.1002/job.583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss JC, Martin AJ. 1988. Identity and private forest management. Soc Nat Res. 1:365–376. 10.1080/08941928809380666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss JC, Martin AJ. 1989. Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Sci. 35:601–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon TE, Meilby H. 2004. Relations between owner characteristics and forest ownership objectives. In: Baumgartner DM, editor. Proceedings of human dimensions of family, farm and community forestry international symposium. Pullman (DC): Washington State University; p. 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ. 2004. An empirical based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners. Scand J For Res. 19:45–55. 10.1080/14004080410034056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm JM, Eisenhauer BW, Stedman, RC. 2013. Environmental concern: examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Soc Nat Res. 26:522–538. 10.1080/08941920.2012.715726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev. 14:532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni A. 1991. The socio-economics of property. J Soc Behav Personal. 6:465–468.
   Google Scholar
• Follo G. 2011. Factors influencing Norwegian small-scale private forest owners' ability to meet the political goals. Scand J For Res. 26:385–393. 10.1080/02827581.2011.566574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geringer JM, Hebert L. 1989. Control and performance of international joint ventures. J Int Bus Stud. 20:235–254. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunebaum JO. 1987. Private ownership. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall A. 2005. Beyond the legal: psychological ownership and responsibility in the family business. Paper presented at: Family Business Network 16th Annual World Conference; Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Hugosson M, Ingemarsson F. 2004. Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners: theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fenn. 38:217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Pykäläinen J, Tikkanen J. 2007. Decision making among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners: the role of professional opinion and desire to learn. Scand J For Res. 22:454–463. 10.1080/02827580701395434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Tikkanen J, Hänninen H, Virkkula O. 2009. Family forest owners' perception of decision support. Scand J For Res. 24:448–460. 10.1080/02827580903140679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen H, Karppinen H, Leppänen J. 2011. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2010 [Finnish forest owner 2010]. Vantaa: Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, p. 208.
   Google Scholar
• Ikävalko M, Pihkala T, Jussila I. 2006. Psychological ownership and family businesses: identifying the common ground through discriminant analysis. Paper presented at: RENT XX—Conference on Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business; Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Ingemarsson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L. 2006. A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21:249–259. 10.1080/02827580600662256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn. 32:43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen H, Tiainen L. 2010. “Semmonen niinku metsäkansa”: Suurten ikäluokkien perijät tulevaisuuden metsänomistajina [“Kind of forest people”: inheritors of the postwar baby-boom generation as the future forest owners]. Metsätieteen Aikakauskirja. 1:19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Ripatti P. 2002. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2000 [The Finnish forest owner in 2000]. Vantaa: Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 852.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen M. 2009. Omistajuus erilaisten yrittäjien käsitteinä ja tulkintoina. Fenomenografinen tutkimus [Ownership as understood and interpreted by different entrepreneur types: a phenomenographic study]. [ Doctoral dissertation, Jyväskylä Studies in Business and Economics 74]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci. 42:300–309.
   Google Scholar
• Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K. 2003. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; p. 138–169.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G. 2010. In competition with a brother: women's inheritance positions in contemporary Swedish family forestry. Scand J For Res. 25:14–24. 10.1080/02827581.2010.506781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt L. 1989. Goals and cutting decisions of private small forest owners. Scand J For Res. 4:259–265. 10.1080/02827588909382563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt L. 1997. Non-industrial private forest owners' decision process: a qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives. Scand J For Res. 12:302–310. 10.1080/02827589709355414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qual Soc Res. 11:1–17. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net
   Google Scholar
• Mattila J, Ikävalko M. 2003. Participative strategy process in a professional organization and the concept of psychological ownership. Paper presented at: The Nordic Academy of Management annual conference; Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Dhubháin Á, Cobanova R, Karppinen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S. 2007. The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small-Scale For. 6:347–357. 10.1007/s11842-007-9030-2
   Google Scholar
• O'Driscoll MP, Pierce JL, Coghlan AM. 2006. The psychology of ownership: work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group Organ Manag. 31:388–416. 10.1177/1059601104273066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. 2001. Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 26:298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. 2003. The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Rev Gen Psychol. 7:84–107. 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Rodgers L. 2004. The psychology of ownership and worker-owner productivity. Group Organ Manag. 29:588–613. 10.1177/1059601103254270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Private forest ownership database 2006–2007. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Forestry Department. Available from: http://www.unece.org/forests/fr/outputs/privateforest.html (29.05.2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W. 2003. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; p. 219–263.
   Google Scholar
• Rämö A-K, Mäkijärvi L, Toivonen R, Horne P. 2009. Suomalaisen metsänomistajan profiili vuonna 2030. Asenteiden ja näkemysten muutokset yhden sukupolven aikana [The profile of the Finnish forest owner 2030. The changes of the attitudes and perceptions during one generation]. Helsinki: Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Reports 221.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JW, Davenport MA, Anderson DH, Leahy JE. 2011. Place meanings and desired management outcomes. Landscape Urban Plann. 101:359–370. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman RC. 2003. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the thysical environment to sense of place. Soc Nat Res. 16:671–685. 10.1080/08941920309189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum AS. 1962. Control in organizations: individual adjustment and organizational performance. Admin Sci Q. 7:236–257. 10.2307/2390857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle D, Van Dyne L, Kostova T. 1995. Psychological ownership: an empirical examination of its consequences. Group Organ Manag. 20:210–226. 10.1177/1059601195202008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Pierce JL. 2004. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav. 25:439–459. 10.1002/job.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining J. 2007. A review of “Identity and the natural environment.” Soc Nat Res. 19:475–478. 10.1080/08941920600561223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA. 2005. Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: characteristics and future potential. Small-Scale For. 4:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wynveen CJ, Kyle GT, Sutton SG. 2012. Natural area visitors' place meaning and place attachement ascribed to a marine setting. J Environ Psychol. 32:287–296. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar