The Forest Kingdom – with what values for the world? Climate change and gender equality in a contested forest policy context

References

• Acker J. 2004. Gender, capitalism and globalization. Crit Soc. 30:17–41.10.1163/156916304322981668
   Google Scholar
• Action Plan. 2011. Ministry for Rural Affairs. The Forest Kingdom – with values for the world. Stockholm: Ministry for Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Appelstrand M. 2012. Developments in Swedish forest policy and administration – from a “policy of restriction” toward a “policy of cooperation”. Scand J For Res. 27:186–199.10.1080/02827581.2011.635069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson S. 2004. Relational dynamics and strategies: men and women in a forest community in Sweden. Agric Hum Values. 21:355–365.10.1007/s10460-003-1222-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson S. 2005 Unsettling the order: gendered subjects and grassroots activism in two forest communities. Department of Rural Development and Agroecology. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; p. 361.
   Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson S. 2013. Gender, development and environmental governance: theorizing connections. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi C. 2009. Analyzing policy: what's the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest (NSW): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barad K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs. 28:801–831. 10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström M. 2002. Skogen märks – Hur svensk skogscertifiering kom till och dess konsekvenser [Marking the forest – how Swedish forest certification came to exist and its consequences]. Score Working Paper Series. Stockholm: Score.
   Google Scholar
• Programförklaring för Sveriges internationella skogspolitik [Declaration of Sweden's International Forest Policy]. 2012. Hållbarhet, ansvar och konkurrenskraft. [Sustainability, responsibility and competitiveness]. Stockholm: Ministry for Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Ds. 1991: 31. Skogspolitik för ett nytt sekel – sammanfattning [Forest policy for a new century – a summary]. Expertgruppen för Studier i Offentlig Ekonomi. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Ds. 2004: 39. Det går långsamt fram … Jämställdheten inom jord- och skogsbrukssektorn. [Slow to advance … gender equality in the agricultural and forestry sector]. Stockholm: Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E. 2010. Inledningstal – workshop för en jämställdhetsstrategi inom skogsbrukssektorn. [Opening speech – workshop on a gender equality strategy within the forestry sector] [cited 2012 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/12536/a/151352
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels (WI): COM.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg M. 2012. Skogen som livsmiljö. En rättsvetenskaplig studie om skyddet för biologisk mångfald [Forests as habitats: a legal study of the protection of biological diversity in forests]. Uppsala: Elanders AB.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. 1979. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books, A division of Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gane M. 2007. Forest strategy: strategic management and sustainable development for the forest sector. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gender Strategy. 2011. Ministry for Rural Affairs. Konkurrenskraft kräver jämställdhet. Jämställdhetsstrategi för skogsbrukssektorn [Competitiveness requires gender equality: a gender equality strategy for the forestry sector]. Linköping: LTAB.
   Google Scholar
• Gender strategy, short version. 2011. Ministry for Rural Affairs. Konkurrenskraft kräver jämställdhet. Kort om jämställdhetsstrategin för skogsbrukssektorn. [Competitiveness requires gender equality. Short about the gender equality strategy for the forestry sector]. Linköping: LTAB.
   Google Scholar
• Hugosson M, Ingemarson F. 2004. Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fenn. 38:217–231.10.14214/sf.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing E, Olsson J. 2008. Contextualising the advocacy coalition framework: theorising change in Swedish forest policy. Environ Polit. 17:730–748.10.1080/09644010802421471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson J. 2013. Constructing and contesting the legitimacy of private forest governance: the case of forest certification in Sweden. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Keller R. 2011. The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Hum Stud. 34:43–65.10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman J, Jentoft S. 2009. Meta-governance: values, norms and principles and the making of hard choices. Public Admin. 87:818–836.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KSLA. 2009. The Swedish forestry model. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Sjölander AE. 2007. Gender and forestry: a critical discourse analysis of forestry professions in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 22:351–362.10.1080/02827580701504928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl KB, Westholm E. 2011. Food, paper, wood, or energy? Global trends and future Swedish forest use. Forests. 2:51–65.10.3390/f2010051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl KB, Westholm E. 2012. Future forests: perceptions and strategies of key actors. Scand J For Res. 27:154–163.10.1080/02827581.2011.635073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindkvist A, Mineur E, Nordlund A, Nordlund C, Olsson O, Sandström C, Westin K, Keskitalo ECH. 2012. Attitudes on intensive forestry. An investigation into perceptions of increased production requirements in Swedish forestry. Scand J For Res. 27:438–448.10.1080/02827581.2011.645867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lownpes V. 1996. Varieties of new institutionalism: a critical Appraisal. Publ Admin. 74:181–197.10.1111/j.1467-9299.1996.tb00865.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry for Rural Affairs. 2013. Skogsriket – med värden för världen. Faktablad [The forest kingdom – with values for the world. Fact Sheet]. Government Offices of Sweden. Stockholm: Ministry for Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• MINT. 2009. Möjligheter till intensivodling av skog [Possibilities for intensive management of forest]. Regeringsuppdrag Jo2008/1885. Slutrapport. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Montin S, Hedlund G. 2009. Governance som interaktiv samhällsstyrning – gammalt eller nytt i forskning och politik? [Governance as interactive steering of society – olds and news in research and policy]. In: Montin S, Hedlund G, editors. Governance på Svenska [Governance in Swedish]. Tyskland: Santérus Academic Press Sweden; p. 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson S. 2012. Future Swedish forest policy process [cited 2013 Sept 2]. Available from: http://www.sou.gov.se/sb/d/17400/a/213584
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund A, Westin K. 2011. Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests. 2:30–50.10.3390/f2010030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters BGG. 2006. Forms of informality: identifying informal governance in the European Union. Perspect Eur Polit Soc. 7:25–40.10.1080/15705850600839538
   Google Scholar
• Press release. 2013. Trästad – regeringen satsar på klimatsmart byggande [Wooden city – the government invests in climate smart construction] [revised 2013 Jul 18; cited 2014 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.government.se/sb/d/17589/a/220917
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 1992/1993: 226. En ny skogspolitik [A new forest policy]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 1997/1998: 158. 1998. Uppföljning av skogspolitiken [Reassessment of the forest policy]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 2007/2008: 108. En skogspolitik i takt med tiden [A forest policy in line with times]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 2008/2009: 162. En sammanhållen klimat- och energipolitik – Klimat [A coherent climate and energy policy – Climate]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MG. 2008. Reproducing the gender order in Canadian forestry: the role of statistical representation. Scand J For Res. 23:78–91.10.1080/02827580701745778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringens skrivelse. 2011/2012: 3. Jämställdhetspolitikens inriktning 2011–2014. [The focus of the gender equality policy 2011–2014]. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reportage. 2012. Klimatsmart på höjden [Climate smart at heights] [revised 2012 Nov 27; cited 2014 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/18014/a/204583
   Google Scholar
• Schlyter P, Stjernquist I. 2010. Regulatory challenges and forest governance in Sweden. In: Bäckstrand K, Khan J, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, editors. Enironmental politics and deliberative democracy. Examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 180–196.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Appl Psychol. 48:23–47.10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEPA. 2012. Steg på Vägen. Fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålen, 2012 [Steps along the way. In depth evaluation of the environmental quality objectives, 2012]. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA. 2013. Sustainable forests [cited 2014 Jun 25]. Available from: http://www.miljomal.se/sv/Environmental-Objectives-Portal/Undre-meny/About-the-Environmental-Objectives/12-Sustainable-Forests/
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 1998. Skogsvårdsorganisationens utvärdering av skogspolitiken [Evaluation of the effects of forest policy]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2001a. De skogliga aktörerna och skogspolitiken [The forest actors and forest policy]. SUS 2001. SUS. Rapport 8H. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2001b. Skogspolitiken idag – en beskrivning av den politik och övriga faktorer som påverkar skogen och skogsbruket [Current forest policy – a description of policies and other factors effecting forests and forestry] SUS. Rapport 8B. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2007. Svenskt skogsbruk möter klimatförändringarna [Swedish forestry meets climate change]. Rapport 8.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2010. Beställa skogsbrukstjänster [Ordering forest services] [cited 2013 Sept 16]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Global/PUBLIKATIONER/Flippkatalog/Bocker/Best%C3%A4lla%20skogsbrukstj%C3%A4nster/index.html#/5/zoomed
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2011a. Förslag på åtgärder för att skapa förutsättningar för ökad jämställdhet bland skogsägare [Recommendations for generating conditions for increased gender equality among forest owners]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2011b. Utveckla insatser inom SIS för att särskilt öka flickors intresse för det skogliga området [Develop interventions within SIS in order to especially increase the interest in the forest area amongst girls]. Dnr 2011/2018. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2013. Förstudie om ett nationellt skogsprogram för Sverige – Förslag och ställningstaganden. [Prestudy on a national forest programme in Sweden – proposals and positions]. Meddelande 5 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 13]. The Forest Kingdom Webpage, Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/14709
   Google Scholar
• SFA and SEPA. 2001. Skogsvårdsorganisationens utvärdering av skogspolitikens effekter – SUS 2001 [Evaluation of the effects of forest policy]. Borås: Central Tryckeriet.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2005: 39. Skog till nytta för alla [Forest for the benefit of all]. Stockholm: Ministry of Industry, Employment, and Communications.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2013:43. Långsiktigt hållbar markanvändning – del 1 [Long term land use – part 1]. Delbetänkande av miljömålsberedningen. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Storch S, Winkel G. 2013. Coupling climate change and forest policy: a multiple streams analysis of two German case studies. For Policy Econ. 36:14–26.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström G. 2010. In search of democracy. The process behind the Swedish forest-sector objectives. In: Sundström G, Soneryd L, Furusten S, editors. Organizing democracy: the construction of agency in practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forestry. 2012. Ministry for Rural Affairs. Stockholm: Ministry for Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Zaremba M. 2012. Skogen vi ärvde [The forest we inherited]. Dagens Nyheter [Internet]. [cited 2014 June 25]. Available from: http://www.dn.se/Stories/stories-kultur/skogen-vi-arvde
   Google Scholar