Conflict situations and response strategies in urban forests in Switzerland

References

• Andersson K. 2006. Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework. Sustainability: Sci Pract Policy. 2:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• BAFU Bundesamt für Umwelt. 2013. Funktionen des Waldes [Forest functions]; [cited 2013 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.bafu.admin.ch/wald/01198/index.html?lang=de.
   Google Scholar
• Brändli U-B. (Red.). 2010. Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Ergebnisse der dritten Erhebung 2004–2006 [Swiss National Forest Inventory. Results of the third survey 2004–2006]. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, BAFU; p. 312.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, A, Lawrence, A. 2013. Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. For Policy Econ. 33:104–111. [10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.002]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUWAL Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (Hrsg.). 1999. Gesellschaftliche Ansprüche an den Schweizer Wald – Meinungsumfrage [Social demands on the Swiss forest – Opinion survey]. Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 309. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft; p. 152.
   Google Scholar
• Chadsey M, Trainer VL, Leschine TM. 2012. Cooperation of science and management for harmful algal blooms: domoic acid and the Washington coast razor clam fishery. Coastal Manage. 40:33–54. [10.1080/08920753.2011.639865]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Code. 1907. Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch vom 10. Dezember 1907 [Swiss Civil Code of 10 December 1907]. SR 210. Stand 21. December 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Clement F. 2010. Analysing decentralized natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicized” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sci. 43:129–156. [10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement F, Amezaga JM. 2008. Linking reforestation policies with land use change in northern Vietnam: Why local factors matter. Geoforum 39:265–277. [10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.008]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman EA, Steed BC. 2009. Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: An application to forestry. Ecol Econ. 68:2106–2113. [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.006]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Hardin R. Levi M. 2005. Cooperation without trust? New York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dong S, Lassoie J, Shrestha KK, Yan Z, Sharma E, Pariya D. 2009. Institutional development for sustainable rangeland resource and ecosystem management in mountainous areas of northern Nepal. J Environ Manage. 90:994–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass RW. 2000. Forest recreation. Waveland Press; p. 389.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman D. 2005. Doing research: methods of inquiry for conflict analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards P, Kleinschmit D. 2013. Towards a European forest policy – conflicting courses. For Policy Econ. 33:87–93. [10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.002]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL (Hrsg.). 2011. Der multifunktionale Wald – Konflikte und Lösungen [The multifunctional forest – conflicts and solutions]. Birmensdorf: Forum für Wissen; p. 58.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell H, Knight J. 2003. Trust, institutions, and institutional change. Industrial districts and the social capital hypothesis. Polit Soc. 31:537-566. [10.1177/0032329203256954]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielman P, Evans L, Fabinyi M, Foale S, Cinner J, Rosen F. 2012. Governing large-scale marine commons: contextual challenges in the coral triangle. Mar Policy. 36:42–53. [10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOREST EUROPE, UNECE, FAO. 2011. State of Europe's forests 2011. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe; p. 344.
   Google Scholar
• Gritten D, Saastamoinen O, Sajama S. 2009. Ethical analysis: a structured approach to facilitate the resolution of forest conflicts. For Policy Econ. 11:555–560. [10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.003]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy SD, Koontz TM. 2009. Rules for collaboration: institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships. Policy Stud J. 37:393–414. [10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00320.x]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hares M. 2009. Forest conflict in Thailand: northern minorities in focus. Environ Manage. 43:381–395. [10.1007/s00267-008-9239-7]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harshaw HW, Sheppard SRJ, Kozak RA. 2007. Outdoor recreation and forest management: a plea for empirical data. For Chron. 83:231–238. [10.5558/tfc83231-2]
   Google Scholar
• Harwell E, Farah D, Blundell AG. 2011. Forests, fragility and conflict: overview and case studies. Washington, D.C: Program on Forests (PROFOR).
   Google Scholar
• Hellström E. 2001. Conflict cultures – qualitative Comparative Analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. Silva Fennica Monogr. 2:109.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood JL. 1990. Social order in forest recreation settings. USDA forest report service. Columbus (OH): Pacific Southwest Research Services, School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University; p. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Henry AD, Dietz T. 2011. Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance. Int J Commons. 5:188–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubo C, Krott M. 2013. Conflict camouflaging in public administration – a case study in nature conservation policy in Lower Saxony. For Policy Econ. 33:63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunziker M, von Linden E, Bauer N, Frick J. 2012. Das Verhältnis der Schweizer Bevölkerung zum Wald Waldmonitoring soziokulturell: Weiterentwicklung und zweite Erhebung – WaMos 2 [The relationship of the Swiss population to the forest. A socio-cultural forest monitoring: further developments and second survey – WaMos 2]. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL; p. 178.
   Google Scholar
• Jay M, Schraml U. 2012. Managing city forests for or in spite of recreation? Perspectives of forest managers. Eur J For Res. 132:93–105. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0658-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijnendijk CC. 2003. A decade of urban forestry in Europe. For Policy Econ. 5:173–186. [10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00023-6]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman J. 1993. Modern governance: new government-society interactions. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Krott M. 2005. Forest policy analysis. R. von Paschen, Translator; Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mann C, Absher JD. 2008. Recreation conflict potential and management implications in the northern / central Black Forest Nature Park. Journal of Environ Plann Manage. 51:363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May T. 2001. Social research: issues, methods and processes. 3rd ed. Buckingham: OU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Theoretical foundation and basic procedures]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag; p. 144.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis MD. 2011. Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Stud J. 39:51–77. [10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehring M, Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Koch S, Barkmann J, Schwarze S, Stoll-Kleemann S. 2011. Local institutions: regulation and valuation of forest use-Evidence from Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land Use Policy. 28:736–747. [10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.001]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtar MB, Toriman MEH, Hossain MAA, Tan KW. 2011. Institutional challenges for integrated river basin management in Langat River Basin, Malaysia. J Food Agric Environ. 10:866–870.
   Google Scholar
• Mulazzani L, Curtin R, Andrés M, Malorgio G. 2013. Multilevel governance and management of shared stocks with integrated markets: the European anchovy case. Mar Policy. 38:407–416. [10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.020]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemälä J, Young J, Alard D, Askasibar M, Henle K, Johnson R, Kurttila M, Larsson T-B, Matouch S, Nowicki P, et al. 2005. Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe. For Policy Econ. 7:877–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; p. 376.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325: 419–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J. 39: 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala T. Primmer E. 2003. Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland. Environ Sci Policy. 6:205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeland K, Ballesteros N, Berger T. 2005. Economic integration of urban consumers´ demand and rural forestry production. Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica. Special Edition, 695–724.
   Google Scholar
• Sténs A, Sandström C. 2013. Divergent interests and ideas around property rights: the case of berry harvesting in Sweden. For Policy Econ. 33:56–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toriman ME, Mokhtar MB, Hossain Md AA, Abdul Aziz NA, Mohamad S, Md Hashim N, Ahmad S, Ali N, Mohd Fuad MJ, Habibah A, et al. 2012. Social leaning approach in integrated river basin management-lessons from the langat river basin, Malaysia. Adv Nat Appl Sci. 6:42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer U, Brändli, U-B. 2010. “Erholung im Schweizer Wald – Ergebnisse des dritten Landesforstinventars LFI3” [Recreation in the Swiss forest – results from the third Swiss National Forest Inventory assessment]. Wald und Holz. 5:31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Vuletić D, Stojanovska M, Avdibegović M, Nevenić R, Petrović N, Posavec S, Haska H, Peri L, Blagojević D. 2010. Forest-related conflicts in the south-east European region: regional aspects and case studies in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia and Serbia. In: Tuomasjukka T, editor. Forest policy and economics in support of good governance. EFI Proceedings, 58. Joensuu: European Forest Institute; p. 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Walker GB, Daniels SE. 1997. Foundation of natural resource conflict: conflict theory and public policy. In: Solberg B, Miina S, editors. Conflict management and participation in land management. Joensuu: European Forestry Institute Proceeding No. 14; p. 7–36
   Google Scholar
• Wall JA, Callister RR. 1995. Conflicts and its management. J Manage. 21:515–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSL Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft. 2012. Schweizerische Landesforstinventar LFI. Datenbankauszug vom 25.06.2012 [Swiss national forest inventory. Database excerpt 25.06.2012]. Birmensdorf, Zurich: Christoph Fischer. Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft.
   Google Scholar