Variability in height growth, survival and nursery carryover effect of Betula papyrifera provenances

References

• Balliet N. 2009. Genecology of 20 paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) provenances from British Columbia and Northern Idaho [MSc thesis]. Prince George: Natural Resources and Environmental Studies (Forestry), University of Northern BC.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden-Green R., Rooke H. 1980. Projected recovery of plantable tree per bed foot. BC Forest service, silvicultural branch, Unpublished Report. Victoria, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Callaham RZ. 1962. Geographic variability in growth of forest trees. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Tree growth. New York: Ronald Press Company; p. 311–325.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell KA, Hawkins CDB. 2004. Effect of seed source and nursery culture on paper birch (Betula papyrifera) uprooting resistance and field performance. For Ecol Manage. 196:425–433. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell RK, Sorensen FC. 1984. Genetic implications of nursery practices. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD, editor. Forest nursery manual: production of bare root seedlings. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk; p. 183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson MR, Berger VG, Hawkins CDB. 2000. Seed source testing of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) in the interior of British Columbia. J Sustain For. 10:25–34. 10.1300/J091v10n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Chmura DJ, Rozkowski R. 2002. Variability of beech provenances in spring and autumn phenology. Silvae Gene. 51:123–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole EC, Newton M, Youngblood A. 1999. Regenerating white spruce, paper birch, and willow in south-central in Alaska. Can J For Res. 29:993–1001. 10.1139/x99-030
   Google Scholar
• Domisch T, Finer L, Lehto T. 2001. Effects of soil temperature on biomass and carbohydrate allocation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings at the beginning of the growing season. Tree Physiol. 21:465–472. 10.1093/treephys/21.7.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Jonsson A. 1986. A review of the genetics of Betula. Scand J For Res. 1:421–434. 10.1080/02827588609382434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2000. Ecophysiology of northern spruce species – the performance of planted seedlings. Ottawa: NRC Research Press; p. 407
   Google Scholar
• Hamann A, Wang T. 2006. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87:2773–2786. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2773:PEOCCO]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks S. 1969. Birch nursery practice. In: Birch Symposium, Proceedings, August 19–21, Durham, NH: USDA Forest Service, Northeast Exp. Sta., Upper Darby, PA; p. 83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins CDB. 1998. Interactions of forest seedling nurseries and seed orchards. In: Puri S, editor. Tree improvement: applied research and technology transfer. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; p. 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins CDB, Dhar A. 2012. Spring bud phenology of 18 Betula papyrifera populations in British Columbia. Scand J For Res. 27:507–519 10.1080/02827581.2012.671356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Lange J. 2013. Vegetation management with Glyphosate has little impact on understory species diversity or tree growth in a sub boreal spruce plantation – a case study. Plant Biosyst. 147:105–114. 10.1080/11263504.2012.736421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgerson OT, Tesch SD, McNabb DH. 1992. Effects of stocktype, shading, and species on reforestation of a droughty site in southwest Oregon. North West Sci. 66:57–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang HP. 1989. Risks arising from the reduction of the genetic variability of some Alpine Norway spruce provenances by size grading. Forestry. 62:49–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer A. 1982. Growth studies on silver birch (Betula verrucosa Ehrh.) in Norway. Meld Norg Landbr Hpgsk. 61:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Vihera-Aarnio A, Puhakainen T, Junttila O, Heino P, Palva ET. 2003. Ecotype-dependent control of growth, dormancy and freezing tolerance under seasonal changes in Betula pendula Roth. Trees. 17:127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehle C. 1998. Height growth tradeoffs determine northern and southern range limits for trees. J Biogeo. 25:735–742. 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern EK. 1996. Geographic variation in forest trees genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern EK, Mullin TJ. 1990. Growth and survival of black spruce in the range – wide provenances study. Can J For Res. 20:130–143. 10.1139/x90-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland TL, Mohammed GH, Wagner RG. 2001. Morphological characteristics associated with tolerance to competition from herbaceous vegetation for seedlings of jack pine, black spruce, and white pine. New Forest. 21:199–215. 10.1023/A:1012091917395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson E, Peterson N, Simard S, Wang J. 1997. Paper birch manager's handbook for British Columbia. BC Ministry of Forests, FRDA Report 271; Victoria, BC; p. 134. Available from: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/frr/frr271.htm
   Google Scholar
• Raulo J, Koski V. 1975. Height growth of different progenies of Betula verrucosa Ehrh. in South and Middle Finland. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. 84:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeldt GE, Tchebakova NM, Barnhardt LK. 1999. Efficacy of climate transfer functions: introduction of Eurasian populations of Larix into Alberta. Can J For Res. 29:1660–1668. 10.1139/x99-143
   Google Scholar
• Rousi M, Tahvanainen J, Henttonen H, Herms DA, Uotila I. 1997. Clonal variation in susceptibility of white birches (Betula spp.) to mammalian and insect herbivores. For Sci. 43:396–402.
   Google Scholar
• Vaartaja O. 1954. Photoperiodic ecotypes of trees. Can J Bot. 32:392–399. 10.1139/b54-036
   Google Scholar
• Veen B. 1954. General remarks on provenance research in forestry. Euphytica. 3:89–96. 10.1007/BF00029955
   Google Scholar
• Viherä-Aarnio A, Häkkinen R, Junttila O. 2006. Critical night length for bud set and its variation in two photoperiodic ecotypes of Betula pendula. Tree Physiol. 26:1013–1018. 10.1093/treephys/26.8.1013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viherä-Aarnio A, Häkkinen R, Partanen J, Luomajoki A, Koski V. 2005. Effects of seed origin and sowing time on timing of height growth cessation of Betula pendula seedlings. Tree Physiol. 25:101–108. 10.1093/treephys/25.1.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viherä-Aarnio A, Velling P. 2008. Seed transfers of silver birch (Betula pendula) from the Baltic to Finland – effect on growth and stem quality. Silva Fenn. 42:735–751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyse A, Simard SW. 2009. Broadleaves in the interior of British Columbia: their extent, use, management and prospects for investment in genetic conservation and improvement. Forest Chron. 85:528–537.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeley PC. 1963. Reducing the effects of nursery influences upon provenance tests. In: Proceedings of a Forest Genetics Workshop. Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee. Publication No. 22. Macon, GA; p. 28–32 [2013 September 30]. Available from: https://nurserycoop.auburn.edu/PDF%20files/reducing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang T, Hamann A, Yanchuk A, O'Neill GA, Aitken SN. 2006. Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Glob Change Biol. 12:2404–2416. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrell R, Cundall EP, Malcolm DC, Ennos RA. 2000. Variation among seed sources of silver birch in Scotland. Forestry. 73:419–435. 10.1093/forestry/73.5.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar