Implementation of forest certification in Sweden: an issue of organisation and communication

References

• Burström von Malmborg F. 2002. Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Bus Strat Environ. 11:312–232.
   Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Auld G. and Newsom D. 2004. Governing Through Markets - Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elg M, and Witell L. 2007. Ständiga förbättringar – grunden i ett lyckat förbättringsarbete [Continuous improvement – the foundation for successful improvements]. In Elg M, Gauthereau V, Witell L, editors. Att lyckas med förbättringsarbete – förbättra, förändra, förnya [To succeed with continuous improvement – improve, change, renew]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; p. 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• [FSC] Forest Stewardship Council. 2009. Svenska FSC:s skogsbruksstandard V2-0 240210 [The Swedish FSC Standard]. Stockholm: Forest Stewardship Council Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Högvall Nordin M. 2006. “Dom brukar jämföra det med en stridspilot”. Föreställningar om arbetsmiljö och risker i skogsmaskinarbetet. En studie i organisationskommunikation. [They compare it with being a fighter pilot. Understandings of work environment and risks in forestry machine work. A study in organizational communication] [doctoral thesis]. Umeå: Department of Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Hokajärvi R, Hujala T, Tikkanen J. 2011. Change in forest planner's advisory role. Scand J For Res. 26:466–476. 10.1080/02827581.2011.579996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmen. 2011 Certifierad skog enligt FSC och PEFC [Certified forest in accordance with FSC and PEFC]. Örnsköldsvik: Holmen Skog.
   Google Scholar
• Hugosson M. 1999. Constructing cultural patterns from actor's views on industrial forestry in Sweden: an interpretative study based on assessments of conceptualizations and definitions in organizational culture theory [doctoral thesis]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Silvestria.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson R. 2004. Total quality management for sustainable development – focus on processes [doctoral thesis 2004: 18]. Luleå: Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson R, Johansson P, Fischer K. 2010. Detecting supply chain innovation potential for sustainable development. J Bus Ethics. 97:425–442. 10.1007/s10551-010-0516-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson J. 2012. Challenges to the legitimacy of private forest governance – the development of forest certification in Sweden. Environ Policy Gov. 22:424–436
   Google Scholar
• Johansson T, Hjältén J, de Jong J, von Stendingk H. 2009. Generell hänsyn och naturvärdesindikationer – funktionella metoder för att bevara och bedöma biologisk mångfald i skogslandskapet. [General consideration and enviromental values – functional methods for preserving and assessing biodiversity in the forest landscape]. Solna: Världsnaturfonden WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson J, Keskitalo ECH. in press. Coordinating and implementing multiple systems for forest management: implications of the regulatory framework for sustainable forestry in Sweden. J Nat Resour Policy Res.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo ECH, Sandström C, Tysiachniouk M, Johansson J. 2009. Local consequences of applying international norms: differences in the application of forest certification in northern Sweden, northern Finland, and northwest Russia. Ecol Soc. 14:1. [online]. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art1/
   Google Scholar
• Kortelainen J. 2012. Boundaries of transnational forest governance in Russia. Scand J For Res. 27:221–228 10.1080/02827581.2011.635077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [PEFC] Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification. 2006. PEFC standards [The Swedish PEFC standard]. (Kombinerat Tekniskt Dokument II Med Tillämpningskrav 1 April 2006–28 February 2011. Tekniskt Dokument II approved by PEFCC on 28 February 2006). Application requirements approved by the Swedish PEFC Board on 28 June 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Persson A, Norstedt G. 2003. Naturvårdsbestånd i gröna skogsbruksplaner. [Environmental protection in green forestry plans]. Arbetsrapport nr 544. Uppsala: Skogforsk.
   Google Scholar
• Petros Sebhatu S, Enquist B. 2007. ISO 14001 as a driving force for sustainable development and value creation. TQM Magazine 19:468–482. 10.1108/09544780710817883
   Google Scholar
• Poksinska B. 2007. På väg mot ständiga förbättringar med ISO 9001 [Towards continuous improvement with ISO 9001]. In: Elg M, Gauthereau V, Witell L, editors. Att lyckas med förbättringsarbete – förbättra, förändra, förnya. [To succeed with improvement work – improve, change, renew]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; pp. 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser T. 2010. The regulatory enterprise. Government, regulation and legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin M. 2013. Credibility at stake. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Sammalisto K, Brorson T. 2008. Training and communication in the implementation of environmental management systems (ISO 14001): a case study at the University of Gävle, Sweden. J Clean Prod. 16:299–309. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhuisen B. 2009. Competing public values: coping strategies in heavily regulated utility industries [PhD Thesis]. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Borg P, Bergsaker E. 2008. A comparison of biodiversity values in boreal forest regeneration areas before and after forest certification. Scand J For Res. 23:236–324. 10.1080/02827580802158228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2008a. Generell hänsyn – en fallstudie [General consideration – a case study]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/episerver4/dokument/mn/Z_Ost/080404_Fallstudie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2008b. Natur-och kulturmiljöhänsyn vid föryngringsavverkning – resultat från Skogsstyrelsens rikspolytaxinventering (R1), 1999–2006 [Environmental and social consideration in logging – results from the Swedish forest agency Polytax inventory 1999–2006]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/episerver4/dokument/sks/aktuellt/press/2008/Generell%20hänsyn/PM%20Polytaxresultat%20miljöhänsyn%202008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2008c. Press release published 07/04/08: Miljöhänsyn i skogsbruket på fortsatt låg nivå [Environmental consideration in forestry at continuously low level]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/episerver4/templates/SNormalPage.aspx?id=38956#
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Stockholm. 2002. Remissvar Levande skogar i Stockholms län [Reply to consultation: sustainable forests in Stockholm county]. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D. 2002. Introduction: the environmental manager's toolbox. In: Thompson D, editor. Tools for environmental management. A practical introduction and guide. Calgary: University of Calgary Press; pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Toivonen R, Valkeapää A, Rämö A-K. 2013. Consumer perceptions of environmental and social sustainability of wood products in the Finnish market. Scand J For Res. 28:775–783. 10.1080/02827581.2013.824021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trishkin M, Lopatin E, Karjalainen T. 2014. Assessment of motivation and attitudes of forest industry companies towards forest certification in North-Western Russia. Scand J For Res. 29:283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsson E. 2006. Forest management planning for private forest owners in Sweden. In: Forest planning in private forests in Finland, Iceland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden. Proceedings of ELAV Seminar, 23–24 March 2006, Koli, Finland. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 38:52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zutshi A, Sohal A. 2002. Environmental management systems auditing: auditors' experiences in Australia. Int J Environ Sustain Dev. 1:73–87. 10.1504/IJESD.2002.000719
   Google Scholar
• Zutshi A, Sohal A. 2004a. A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations – 2. Role of stakeholders. Technovation. 23:371–386. 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00115-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zutshi A, Sohal A. 2004b. Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems: critical success factors. Manage Environ Quality. 15:399–419. 10.1108/14777830410540144
   Google Scholar