Biomass, stem basic density and expansion factor functions for five exotic conifers grown in Denmark

References

• Aravanopoulos FA. 2010. Breeding of fast growing forest tree species for biomass production in Greece. Biomass Bioenergy. 34:1531–1537. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bancalari MAE, Perry, DA. 1987. Distribution and increment of biomass in adjacent young Douglas-fir stands with different early growth rates. Can J For Res. 17:722–730. 10.1139/x87-115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay HJ, Pang PC, Pollard DFW. 1986. Aboveground biomass distribution within trees and stands in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Can J For Res. 16:438–442. 10.1139/x86-080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelink HH. 1996. Allometric relationships on biomass and needle area of Douglas-fir. For Ecol Manage. 86:193–203. 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03783-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstedt A, Larsen JB. 1998. Vedkvalitet hos grandis: Hvordan kan den påvirkes gennem skovdyrkningen? [Wood quality in grand fir: how can it be affected through forest management?] In: Rasmussen JN, editor. Copenhagen: Center for Forest, Landscape and Planning; p. 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson P, Gustavsson L. 2000. Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from lifecycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy. 28:575–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson P, Gustavsson L, Christersson L, Linder S. 1997. Future production and utilization of biomass in Sweden: potentials and CO2 mitigation. Biomass Bioenergy. 13:399–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann BT. 1990. Diameter-based biomass regression models ignore large sapwood-related variation in Sitka spruce. Can J For Res. 20:1098–1104. 10.1139/x90-145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier JD. 1970. The effect of spacing on the wood density and wood yields of Sitka spruce. For Suppl. 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JK. 1978. Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountains conifers. Research Paper INT-197. USDA Forest Service; Oregon (OR).
   Google Scholar
• Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with application to forest inventory data. For Sci. 35:881–902.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho JP, Parresol BR. 2003. Additivity in tree biomass components of Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd). For Ecol Manage. 179:269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, et al. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia. 145:87–99. 10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clair JBS. 1993. Family differences in equations for predicting biomass and leaf area in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). For Sci. 39:743–755.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson K, Nilsson LJ. 2006. Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:1–15. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavsson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J. 2007. Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J For Res. 37:671–681. 10.1139/X06-257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the European Commission. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Tech. rep. Luxembourg: European Parliament and the European Commission; p. 483.
   Google Scholar
• Feldpausch TR, Lloyd J, Lewis SL, Brienen RJW, Gloor M, Monteagudo Mendoza A, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Banin L, Abu Salim K, Affum-Baffoe K, et al. 2012. Tree height integrated into pan-tropical forest biomass estimates. Biogeosciences Discuss. 9:2567–2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller MC. 1992. Generalized versus site-specific biomass regression equations for Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii and Thuja plicata in Coastal British Columbia. Bioresour Technol. 39:9–16. 10.1016/0960-8524(92)90050-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Products Laboratory. 1965. Western wood density survey. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper FPL-27, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison (WI).
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner B, Leban J-M, Auty D, Simpson H. 2011. Models for predicting wood density of British-grown Sitka spruce. Forestry. 84:119–132. 10.1093/forestry/cpq050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparini P, Nocetti M, Tabacchi G, Tosi V. 2005. Biomass equations and data for forest stands and shrublands of the Eastern Alps (Trentino, Italy). In: Reynolds KM, editor, IUFRO conference on sustainable forestry in theory and practice. Portland (OR): Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-688, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; p. 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer WA. 2006. Biomass production in the Central Great Plains USA under various coppice regimes. Biomass Bioenergy. 30:778–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholz HL, Grier CC, Campbell AG, Brown AT. 1979. Equations for estimating biomass and leaf area of plants in the Pacific Northwest. Research Paper 41. Forest Research Lab; Corvallis (OR), p. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Gower ST, Grier CC, Vogt DJ, Vogt KA. 1987. Allometric relations of deciduous (Larix occidentalis) and evergreen conifers (Pinus contorta and Pseudotsuga menziesii) of the Cascade Mountains in central Washington. Can J For Res. 17:630–634. 10.1139/x87-103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower ST, Reich PB, Son Y. 1993. Canopy dynamics and aboveground production of five tree species with different leaf longevities. Tree physiol. 12:327–345. 10.1093/treephys/12.4.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC. 1992. Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol Monogr. 62:43–65. 10.2307/2937170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson L, Börjesson P, Johansson B, Svenningsson P. 1995. Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels. Energy. 20:1097–1113. 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00065-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson L, Sathre R. 2006. Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Build Environ. 41:940–951. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon ME, Ferrel WK, Franklin JF. 1990. Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old growth forests to young forests. Science. 247:699–702. 10.1126/science.247.4943.699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hees A. 2001. Biomass development in unmanaged forests. Ned Bosbouwtijdschrift. 73:2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Helgerson OT, Cromack K, Stafford S, Miller RE, Slagle R. 1988. Equations for estimating aboveground components of young Douglas-fir and red alder in a coastal Oregon plantation. Can J For Res. 18:1082–1085. 10.1139/x88-164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry M, Bombelli A, Trotta C, Alessandrini A, Birigazzi L, Sola G, Vieilledent G, Santenoise P, Longuetaud F, Valentini R, et al. 2013. GlobAllomeTree: international platform for tree allometric equations to support volume, biomass and carbon assessment. iForest – Biogeosci For. 6:326–330. 10.3832/ifor0901-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins J, Chojnacky D, Heath L, Birdsey RA. 2004. Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. General Technical Report NE-319. Washington (DC): US Forest Service; p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen VK, Nord-Larsen T, Riis-Nielsen T, Suadicani K, Jørgensen BB. 2013. Skove og plantager 2012 [Forests and plantations]. Frederiksberg: Skov og Landskab.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson T. 2013. Biomass equations for hybrid larch growing on farmland. Biomass Bioenergy 49:152–159. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson E. 2009. Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:165–168. 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio AMI, Salminen O, Sievänen R. 2013. Sequester or substitute – consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland. J For Econom. 19:402–415. 10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker MF. 1980. Tree biomass equations for seven species in southwestern New Brunswick. Report M-X-114. Fredericton: Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Environment; 18 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kirmse RD, Fisher JT. 1989. Species screening and biomass trials of woody plants in the semi-arid southwest United States. Biomass. 18:15–29. 10.1016/0144-4565(89)90078-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak A. 1970. Methods for ensuring additivity of biomass components by regression analysis. For Chron. 46:402–405. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/tfc46402-5
   Google Scholar
• Laing FM. 1985. Species trials for biomass production on abandoned farmland. North J Appl For. 2:43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J. 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For Ecol Manage. 188:211–224. 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoll BC. 2004. Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry. 77:421–430. 10.1093/forestry/77.5.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz K, Lal R. 2010. Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen SF. 1987. Volume equations for some important Danish forest tree species. Det Forstlige Forsøgsvæsen. 40:47–242.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Borghetti M, Berbigier P, Berninger F, Delzon S, Grelle A, Hari P, Jarvis PG, Kolari P, et al. 2007. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature. 447:849–851. 10.1038/nature05847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantau U, Saal U, Prins K, Steierer F, Lindner M, Verkerk H, Eggers J, Leek N, Oldenburger J, Asikainen A, Anttila P. 2010. EUwood – Real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final report. Hamburg: University of Hamburg; p. 160.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall P, Wang Y. 1995. Above ground tree biomass of interior uneven-aged Douglas-fir stands. Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II. Working Paper WPlS-003.University of British Columbia; Vancouver, 23 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Means J, Hansen H, Koerper G, Alaback P, Klopsch M. 1994. Software for computing plant biomass – BIOPAK users guide. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-340. Portland (OR): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Moltesen P. 1988. Skovtrærnes ved og dets anvendelse [Wood of forest trees and it's use]. Technical report. Copenhagen: Skovteknisk Institut; 132 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R. 2006. Biomass equations for European trees: addendum. Silva Fennica. 40:763–773. 10.14214/sf.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell JP, Vos RO. 2012. Accounting for forest carbon pool dynamics in product carbon footprints: challenges and opportunities. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 37:23–36. 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord-Larsen T, Meilby H, Skovsgaard JP. 2009. Site-specific height growth models for six common tree species in Denmark. Scand J For Res. 24:194–204. 10.1080/02827580902795036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, et al. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science. 333:988–993. 10.1126/science.1201609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parresol BR. 2001. Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations. Can J For Res. 31:865–878. 10.1139/x00-202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parresol BR, Thomas CE. 2014. Econometric modeling of sweetgum stem biomass using the IML and SYSLIN procedures; [cited 2014 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www.sascommunity.org/sugi/SUGI91
   Google Scholar
• Petty JA, MacMillan DC, Steward CM. 1990. Variation of density and growth ring width in stems of Sitka and Norway spruce. Forestry. 63:39–49. 10.1093/forestry/63.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman JE, Militz H. 1996. Wood quality of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) franco) from three stands in the Netherlands. Ann For Sci. 53:1127–1136. 10.1051/forest:19960607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Peinado R, del Rio M, Montero G. 2011. New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species. For Syst. 20:176–188. 10.5424/fs/2011201-11643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savill PS, Sandels AJ. 1983. The influence of early respacing on the wood density of Sitka Spruce. Forestry. 56:109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson HL, Denne MP. 1997. Variation of ring width and specific gravity within trees from unthinned Sitka spruce spacing trial in Clocaenog, North Wales. Forestry. 70:31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard JP, Bald C, Nord-Larsen T. 2011. Functions for biomass and basic density of the stem, the crown and the below-ground stump and root system of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Denmark. Scand J For Res. 26:3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard JP, Nord-Larsen T. 2011. Biomass, basic density and biomass expansion factor functions for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. Eur J For Res. 12:1035–1053.
   Google Scholar
• Snell JAK, Brown JK. 1978. Notes: comparison of tree biomass estimators–DBH and sapwood area. For Sci. 24: 455–457.
   Google Scholar
• Standish JT, Manning GH, Demaerschalk JP. 1985. Development of biomass equations for British Columbia tree species. Information report BC-X-264. Victoria (BC): Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre; 48 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tabacchi G, Cosmo LD, Gasparini P. 2011. Aboveground tree volume and phytomass prediction equations for forest species in Italy. Eur J For Res. 130:911–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teobaldelli M, Somogyi Z, Migliavacca M, Usoltsev VA. 2009. Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. For Ecol Manage. 257: 1004–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD. 1997. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manage. 97:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Heath LS. 2008. The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy. 32:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright SP. 2014. Multivariate analysis using the mixed procedure; [cited 2014 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi23/Stats/p229.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zečić Z, Vusić D, Štimac Z, Cvekan M, Šimić A. 2011. Aboveground biomass of silver fir, European larch and black pine. Croat J For Eng. 32:639–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monogr. 4:1–63.
   Google Scholar