References
- Appelstrand M, Lidestav G. 2015. Women entrepreneurship – a shortcut to a more competitive and equal forestry sector? Scand J For Res. 30:226–234.
- Bernstein S, Cashore B. 2012. Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of influence. Int Affairs. 88:585–604. 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
- Holmgren S, Arora-Jonsson S. 2015. The forest kingdom – with what values for the world? Climate change and gender equality in a contested forest policy. Scand J For Res. 30:235–245.
- Howlett M, Rayner J. 2006. Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: a critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sci 39:1–18. 10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1
- Kooiman J, Jentoft S. 2009. Meta-governance: values, norms and principles and the making of hard choices. Public Admin. 87:818–836. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01780.x
- Lindstad B. 2015. Changes in Norwegian forest policies: what are the effects of the international forest regime complex? Scand J For Res. 30:246–254.
- McEwen A. 2013. Why we need a national forest policy. N Z J For. 58:18–23.
- Mezirow J. 2006. An overview on transformative learning. In: Peter S, Jim C, editors. Lifelong learning: concepts and contexts. Milton Park (UK) and New York (NY): Routledge; p. 24–38.
- Ministry for Rural Affairs. 2011. The forest kingdom – with values for the world. Action plan. Stockholm: Ministry for Rural Affairs.
- Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
- Pülzl H, Hogl K. 2013. Forest governance in Europe. In: Pülzl H, Hogl K, Kleinschmit D, Wydra D, Arts B, Mayer P, Palahi M, Winkel G, Wolfslehner B, editors. European forest governance – issues at stake and the way forward. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute – What Science Can Tell Us 2; p. 11–17.
- Sabatier P Jenkins-Smith H. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: Sabatier P, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; p. 117–166.
- Underdal A. 2008. Determining the causal significance of institutions: accomplishments and challenges. In: Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H. editors. Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge(MA): MIT Press; p. 48–77.
- Vulturius G, Gerger Swartling Å. 2015. Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: experiences with Swedish forestry stakeholders. Scand J For Res. 30:217–225.
- Wilkes-Alleman J, Pütz M, Hirschi C, Fischer C. 2015. Conflict situations and response strategies in urban forests in Switzerland. Scand J For Res. 30:204–216.