235
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of genetic gain and diversity under various genetic thinning scenarios in a breeding seed orchard of Quercus acutissima

, , , &
Pages 377-381 | Received 25 May 2014, Accepted 10 Feb 2015, Published online: 16 Mar 2015

References

  • Adams GW, Morgenstern EK. 1991. Multiple-trait selection in jack pine. Can J For Res. 21:439–445.10.1139/x91-059
  • Barnes RD. 1995. The breeding seedling orchard in the multiple population breeding strategy. Silvae Genet. 44:81–88.
  • Becker WA. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics. Washington (DC): Academic Enterprises Pullman; p. 13–21.
  • Bondesson FL, Lindgren D. 1993. Optimal utilization of clones and genetic thinning of seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 42:157–163.
  • Canavera DS. 1975. Variation among the offspring of selected lower Michigan jack pines. Silvae Genet. 24:12–15.
  • Cockerham C. 1967. Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics. 56:89–104.
  • David A, Pike C, Stine R. 2003. Comparison of selection methods for optimizing genetic gain and gene diversity in a red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) seedling seed orchard. Theor Appl Genet. 107:843–849.10.1007/s00122-003-1330-0
  • El-Kassaby YA, Aakew GR. 1991. The relation between reproductive phenology and reproductive output in determining the potential gametic pool profile in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. For Sci. 37:827–835.
  • El-Kassaby YA, Cook C. 1994. Female reproductive energy and reproductive success in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its impact on genetic diversity. Silvae Genet. 43:243–246.
  • El-Kassaby YA, Rudin D, Yazdani R. 1989. Levels of outcrossing and contamination in two Pinus sylvestris L. seed orchards in northern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 4:41–49.10.1080/02827588909382544
  • Ertekin M. 2010. Clonal fertility variation and genetic diversity in a black pine seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 59:145–150.
  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Malaysia: Longman; p. 48–99.
  • Kamalakannan R, Varghese M, Bilir N, Lindgren D. 2006. Conversion of a progeny trial of Eucalyptus tereticornis to a seedling seed orchard considering gain and fertility. In: IUFRO Joint Conference: ‘Low Input Breeding and Genetic Conservation of Forest Tree Species’; 2006 October 9–13; Antalya; p. 93–99.
  • Kang KS. 2001. Genetic gain and gene diversity of see orchard crops. Acta Univ Agric Suec Silvestria. 187:75.
  • Kang KS, Bila AD, Lindgren D, Choi WY. 2001. Predicted drop in gene diversity over generations in the population where the fertility varies among individuals. Silvae Genet. 50:200–205.
  • Kang KS, Chun BW, Han SU, Kim CS, Choi WY. 2007. Genetic gain and diversity under different selection methods in a breeding seed orchard of Quercus serrata. Silvae Genet. 56:277–281.
  • Kang KS, Lindgren D. 1998. Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus Thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 47:196–201.
  • Kang KS, Lindgren D. 1999. Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis S. et Z.) and its implications on seed orchard management. For Genet. 6:191–200.
  • Kira T, Shidei T. 1967. Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the Western Pacific. J Jap Ecol. 17:70–87.
  • Lee CB. 1987. Dendrology. Seoul: Hyangmoon; p. 141–150. Korean.
  • Lindgren D, Gea LD, Jefferson PA. 1996. Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genet. 45:52–59.
  • Lindgren D, Matheson AC. 1986. An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genet. 35:173–175.
  • Lindgren D, Mullin TJ. 1998. Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can J For Res. 28:276–283.
  • Morris DM, Parker WH, Seabrook R. 1992. Some considerations when selecting young jack pine families using growth and form traits. Can J For Res. 22:429–425.
  • Reynolds S, El-Kassaby YA. 1990. Parental balance in Douglas-fir seed orchards – cone crop vs. seed crop. Silvae Genet. 39:40–42.
  • Roberds JH, Friedman ST, El-Kassaby YA. 1991. Effective number of pollen parents in clonal seed orchards. Theor Appl Genet. 82:3131–3320.10.1007/BF02190617
  • Ryan MG, Phillips N, Bond BJ. 2006. The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revised. Plant Cell Environ. 29:367–381.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x
  • Stoehr M, Webber J, Woods J. 2004. Protocol for rating seed orchard seed lots in British Columbia quantifying genetic gain and diversity. Forestry. 77:297–303.10.1093/forestry/77.4.297
  • Torimaru T, Wang X-R, Fries A, Andersson B, Lindgren D. 2009. Evaluation of pollen contamination in an advanced Scots pine seed orchard in Sweden. Silvae Genet. 58:262–269.
  • Torimaru T, Wennström U, Andersson B, Almqvist C, Wang X-R. 2013. Reduction of pollen contamination in Scots pine seed orchard crop by tent isolation. Scand J For Res. 28:715–723.10.1080/02827581.2013.838298
  • Yim KB. 1991. Silviculture. Seoul: Hyangmoon; p. 307–309. Korean.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.