Container effects on growth and biomass allocation in Quercus robur and Juglans regia seedlings

References

• Aldhous JR, Mason WL, editors. 1994. Forest nursery practice. For Comm Bull. 111:268.
   Google Scholar
• Amorini E, Fabbio G. 1984. Studio di un contenitore per l’allevamento di piante forestali (Study of a container for forest seedlings). Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura [Annals of Silvicultural Research]. XV:43–73.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso G, Frangi P, Piatti R, Ferrini F, Fimi A, Faoro M. 2010. Effect of container design on plant growth and root deformation of Littleleaf Linden and Field Elm. Hort Sci. 45:1824–1829.
   Google Scholar
• Annapurna D, Rathore DS, Joshi G. 2004. Effect of container type and size on the growth and quality of seedlings of Indian sandalwood (Santalum album L.). Austral For. 67:82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Aphalo P, Rikkala R. 2003. Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume. New Forests. 25:93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton BL, Withcomb CE. 1983. Effects of container size and transplanting date on the growth of tree seedlings. J Environ Hort. 1:89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Armand G. 1992. Techniques de plantation de feuillus précieux: caractéristiques de plants de merisier, de frêne, et érable sycomore [Planting high-value broadleaved species: characteristics of wild cherry, ash and sycamore maple]. Revue forestière française. Numéro special: 67–70. French.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge DA. 2012. Using tree shelters as deep containers. Tree Plant Notes. 55:49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy D, Caraglio Y. 2007. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot. 99:375–407. 10.1093/aob/mcl260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becquey J. 1997. Les noyers à bois (Walnut for wood production). Paris: Institut pour le Développement Forestier (IDF). French.
   Google Scholar
• Bolte A, Löf M. 2010. Root spatial distribution and biomass partitioning in Quercus robur L. seedlings: the effects of mounding site preparation in oak plantations. Eur J For Res. 129:603–612. 10.1007/s10342-010-0360-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcher R. 1975. Endogenous shoot growth rhythms and indeterminate shoot growth in oak. Physiol Plantarum. 35:152–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brønnum P. 2004. Does autumn climate affect the applicability of shoot frost hardiness as an operational test parameter for storability of Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) seedlings. In: Ciccarese L, Lucci S, Mattsson A, editors. Proceedings of the conference “Nursery production and stand establishment of broadleaves to promote sustainable forest management” Rome, Italy May 7–10, 2001. APAT, Atti 5/2003.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Sorling GH, Bell AD. 2000. Crown architecture in Quercus petraea and Q. robur: the fate of buds and shoots in relation to age, position and environmental perturbation. Forestry. 73:331–349. 10.1093/forestry/73.4.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett AN. 1979. New methods of measuring root growth capacity: their value in assessing lodgepole stock quality. Can J For Res. 9:63–67. 10.1139/x79-011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett AN. 1983. Quality control in the production of forest planting stock. For Chron. 59:132–138. 10.5558/tfc59132-3
   Google Scholar
• Buresti E. 1984. Il restauro forestale delle discariche ENEL di Santa Barbara nel Valdarno [Forest restoration of Santa Barbara brown coal opencast mine dumps in the Arno Valley]. Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura. XV:157–169. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo E, D’Ambrosi E. 1995. Proposte di standard di idoneità colturale per il postime vivaistico di alcune latifoglie nobili [Proposal of cultural fitness standard for nursery planting stock of some nobles hardwoods]. Monti e Boschi. 4:22–24. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Canham CD, Berkowitz AR, Kelly VR, Lovett GM, Ollinger SV, Schnurr J. 1996. Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Can J For Res. 26:1521–1530. 10.1139/x26-171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson LW, Endean F. 1976. The effect of rooting volume and container configuration on the early growth of white spruce seedlings. Can J For Res. 6:221–224. 10.1139/x76-027
   Google Scholar
• Castro L, Jiménez P, Díaz-Fernández PM, Aranda I, Iglesias S, Gil L. 2003. Review of the activities related to Mediterranean Oaks conservation in Spain. In 2003. Mediterranean Oaks Network, Report of the second meeting, 2–4 May 2002 Gozo, Malta. In: Bozzano M, Turok J, editors. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Hernandez EI, Matos A, Vallejo VR. 2008. Effects of a deep container on morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. For Ecol Manag. 256:779–785. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccarese L. 1998. Performance in campo di noce comune (Juglans regia) da legno. Confronto dopo 4 anni dall'impianto tra semina diretta – semenzali a radice nuda e in contenitore [Establishment of Juglans regia: 4 years comparison of direct seeding, containerized and bare-root nursery stock]. Monti e Boschi. 49:51–58. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Collet C, Frochot H. 1996. Effects of interspecific competition on periodic shoot elongation in oak seedlings. Can J For Res. 26:1934–1942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deans JD, Lundberg C, Cannell MGR, Murray MB, Sheppard LJ. 1990. Root system fibrosity of Sitka spruce transplants: relationship with root growth potential. Forestry. 63:1–7. 10.1093/forestry/63.1.1-a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Campo AD, Navarro RM, Ceacero CJ. 2010. Seedling quality and field performance of commercial stocklots of containerized holm oak (Quercus ilex) in Mediterranean Spain: an approach for establishing a quality standard. New For. 39:19–37. 10.1007/s11056-009-9152-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey DC, Parker WC. 1997. Morphological indicators of stock quality and field performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood. New For. 14:145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreesen DR, Fenchel GA. 2010. Deep-planting techniques to establish riparian vegetation in arid and semiarid regions. Native Plants J. 11:15–22. 10.2979/NPJ.2010.11.1.15
   Google Scholar
• Drenou C. 2000. Pruning trees: the problem of forks. J Arboricult. 26:264–269.
   Google Scholar
• Ducousso A, Bordacs S. 2004. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for pedunculate and sessile oaks (Quercus robur and Q. petraea). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 6 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dumeroese RK, Davis AS, Jacobs DF. 2011. Nursery response of Acacia koa seedlings to container size, irrigation method, and fertilization rate. J Plant Nutr. 34:877–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duryea ML. 1985. Evaluating seedling quality: importance to reforestation. In: Duryea ML, editor. Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive abilities of major tests. Corvallis (OR): Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Endean F, Carlson L. 1975 The effect of rooting volume on the early growth of lodgepole pine seedlings. Can J For Res. 5:55–60. 10.1139/x75-007
   Google Scholar
• Fennessy J, MacLennan L, editors. 2003. Managing our broadleaf resource to produce quality hardwood timber. Proceedings of the COFORD seminar, 10–11 October 2002, Carrick-on-Shannon. COFORD, Dublin; p. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Funk DT, Roth PL, Celmer CK. 1980. The influence of container type and potting medium on growth of black walnut seedlings. Research Note NC-253. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Gazal RM, Blanche CA, Carandang WM. 2004. Root growth potential and seedling morphological attributes of narra (Pterocarpus indicus Willd.) transplants. For Ecol Manag. 195:259–266. 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman EF, Anderson PJ, Harchick C. 2006. Pruning lower branches of live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) cultivars and seedlings during nursery production: balancing growth and efficiency. J Environ Hort. 24:201–206.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman EF, Harchick C, Paz M. 2010. Effect of container type on root form and growth of red maple. J Environ Hort. 28: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2012. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New For. 43:711–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson PJ, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG, Crow TR, Dixon RK. 1986. A morphological index of Quercus seedling ontogeny for use in studies of physiology and growth. Tree Physiol. 2:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmer R. 1989. The effect on mineral nutrients on growth, flushing, apical dominance and branching in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl For. 62:383–395. 10.1093/forestry/62.4.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmer R. 2000. Differences in growth and branch production by young plants of two provenances of Quercus robur L. Forestry. 73:271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathaway RD, Whitcomb CE. 1977. Propagation of Quercus seedlings in bottomless containers with Osmocote. J Arboricult. 3:208–212.
   Google Scholar
• Hess L, De Kroon H. 2007. Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination. J Ecol. 95:241–251. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt HA, Tinus RW. 1974. Container shape controls root system configuration of ponderosa pine. In: Tinus RW, Stein WI, Balmer WE, editors. Proceedings North American Containerized Forest Tree Seedling Symposium. Denver, CO: Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication; p. 68.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs DF, Goodman RC, Gardiner ES, Salifu KF, Overton RP, Hernandez G. 2012. Nursery stock quality as an indicator of bottomland hardwood forest restoration success in the Lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Scand J For Res. 27:255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Seifert JR. 2005. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New For. 30:235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobidon R, Roy V, Cyr G. 2003. Net effect of competing vegetation on selected environmental conditions and performance of four spruce seedling stock sizes after eight years in Quebec (Canada). Ann For Sci. 60:691–699.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson PS. 1981. Early results of planting English oak in an ozark clearcut. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station Research Paper NC 204, U.S. Government Printing Office. 767-105/220 Region No. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Kormanik PP. 1986. Lateral root morphology as an expression of sweetgum seedling quality. For Sci. 32:595–604.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert BB, Harper SJ, Robinson SD. 2010. Effect of container size at time of planting on tree growth rates for baldcypress (Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich), Red Maple (Acer rubrum L.), and Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris Mill.). Arboricult Urban For. 36:93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lamhamedi MS, Bernier PY, Hébert C, Jobidon R. 1998. Physiological and growth responses of three sizes of containerized Picea mariana seedlings outplanted with and without vegetation control. For Ecol Manag. 110:13–23. 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00267-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis TD. 2011. The target plant concept. A history and brief overview. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations – 2010. Proc. RMRS-P-65. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; p. 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP. 1990. Containers and growing media, vol. 2. The container Tree Nursery Manual. Agriculture Handbook, 674. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC; p. 88.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen HS, South DB, Boyer JM. 1986. Root growth potential, seedling morphology and bud dormancy correlate with survival of loblolly pine seedlings planted in December in Alabama. Tree Physiol. 1:253–263. 10.1093/treephys/1.3.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dizes S, Cruiziat P, Lacointe A, Sinoquet H, Le Roux X, Balandier P, Jacquet P. 1997. A model for simulating structure-function relationships in walnut tree growth processes. Silva Fenn. 31:313–328. 10.14214/sf.a8530
   Google Scholar
• Leiva MJ. Fernández-Alés R. 1998. Variability in seedling water status during drought within a Quercus ilex subsp. ballota population, and its relation to seedling morphology. For Ecol Manag. 111:147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloret F, Casanovas C, Peñuelas J. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Funct Ecol. 13:210–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltoni A, Mariotti B, Tani A, Jacobs DF. 2010. Relation of Fraxinus excelsior seedling morphology to growth and root proliferation during field establishment. Scand J For Res. 25:60–67. 10.1080/02827581.2010.485805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler TE, Willis D. 1996. Chemical or air root pruning containers improve carambola, longan, and mango seedling root morphology and initial root growth after planting. J Environ Hort. 14:47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes-Sears U, Larson DW. 1999. Limitations to seedling growth and survival by the quantity and quality of rooting space: implications for the establishment of Thuja occidentalis on cliff faces. Int J Plant Sci. 160:122–128. 10.1086/314105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson A. 1997. Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New For. 13:227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnaughay KDM, Berntson G, Bazzaz F. 1993. Limitations to CO2-induced growth enhancement in pot studies. Oecologia. 94:550–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohni C, Pelleri F, Hemery GE. 2009. The modern silviculture of Juglans regia L.: a literature review. Die Bodenkultur. 60:21–34.
   Google Scholar
• NeSmith DS, Duval JR. 1998. The effect of container size. Hort Technol. 8:495–498.
   Google Scholar
• Oliet J, Plenenelles R, Artero F, Jacobs DF. 2005. Nursery fertilization and tree shelters affect long-term field response of Acacia salicina Lindl. planted in Mediterranean semiarid conditions. For Ecol Manag. 215:339–351. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliet JA, Artero F, Cuadros S, Puertolas Simon J, Luna L, Grau JM. 2012. Deep planting with shelters improves performance of different stocktype sizes under arid Mediterranean conditions. New For. 43:925–939. 10.1007/s11056-012-9345-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliet JA, Jacobs DF. 2012. Restoring forests: advances in techniques and theory. New For. 3:535–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliet JA, Planelles R, Artero F, Valverde R, Jacobs DF, Segura ML. 2009. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition. New For. 37:313–331. 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omari MA. 2010. Impact of pot size on seedlings growth for some forest trees propagated in forest nursery. Jordan J Agricult Sci. 6:534–547. 10.1007/s11056-004-7364-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega U, Majada J, Mena-Petite A, Sanchez-Zabala J, Rodriguez-Iturrizar N, Txarterina K, Azpitarte J, Duñabeitia M. 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New For. 31:97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto JR. 2011. Morphology targets: what do seedling morphological attributes tell us?. In: Riley LE, Haase DL, Pinto JR, editors. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations- 2010. Proc. RMRS-P-65. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; p. 74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto JR, Dumroese KR, Davis AS, Landis DL. 2011a. Conducting seedling stocktype trials: a new approach to an old question. J For. 109:293–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto JR, Marshall JD, Dumroese KR, Davis AS, Cobosc DR. 2011b. Establishment and growth of container seedlings for reforestation: a function of stocktype and edaphic conditions. For Ecol Manag. 261:1876–1884. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA. 2012a. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct Plant Biol. 39:839–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Fiorani F, Stitt M, Schurr U, Finck A, Gibon Y, Usadel B, Munns R, Atkin OK, Tardieu F, Pons TL. 2012b. The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. Funct Plant Biol. 39:821–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Nagel O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol. 27:595–607. 10.1071/PP99173_CO
   Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L. 2011. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193:30–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privett DW, Hummel RL. 1992. Root and shoot growth of ‘Coral Beauty’ cotoneaster and Leyland cypress produced in porous and nonporous containers. J Environ Hort. 10:133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Reader RJ, Jalili A, Grime JP, Spencer RE, Matthews N. 1992. A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. J Ecol. 81:543–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie GA, Landis TD. 2010. Assessing plant quality (Chapter 2). In The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Vol. 7. USDA. Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 674.
   Google Scholar
• Robin R, Carlson WC, Morgan P. 1990. The target seedling concept. In: Rose R, Campbell, SJ, Landis, TD, editors. Proceedings, Western Forest Nursery Association; 1990 August 13–17; Roseburg, OR. General Technical Report RM-200. Fort Collins, CO: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Romero AE, Ryder J, Fisher JT, Mexal JG. 1986. Root system modification of container stock for arid land plantings. For Ecol Manag. 16:281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose R, Carlson WC, Morgan P. 1990. The target seedling concept. In: Rose R, Campbell SJ, Landis TD, editors. Target seedling symposium: proceedings, combined meeting of the western forest nursery associations; 1990 August 13–17; Roseburg, Oregon. Fort Collins (CO): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report RM-200; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Roth V, Dekanić S, Dubravac T. 2011. Effect of acorn size on morphological development of one-year-old seedlings of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) in differing light conditions. Šumarski list – Posebni broj. 135:159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruehle JL, Kormanik PP. 1986. Lateral root morphology: a potential indicator of seedling quality in northern red oak. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Research Note, 6 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rune G. 2003. Slits in container wall improve root structure and stem straightness of outplanted Scots pine seedlings. Silva Fenn. 37:333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier SA, Barthelemy D. 2001. Annual shoot morphology and architecture in Persian walnut, Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae). Acta Hort. 544:255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Salifu KF, Jacobs DF. 2006. Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings. Ann For Sci. 63:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scagel R, Bowden R, Madill M, Kooistra C. 1998. Provincial seedling stock type selection and ordering guidelines. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C; p. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Schmal JL, Jacobs DF, O’Reilly C. 2011. Nitrogen budgeting and quality of exponentially fertilized Quercus robur seedlings in Ireland. Eur J For Res. 130:557–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solar A, Štampar F. 2003. Genotypic differences in branching pattern and fruiting habit in common walnut (Juglans regia L.). Ann Bot. 92:317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer JW, Clatterbuck W, Seifert J. 2009. Site preparation and competition control guidelines for hardwood tree plantings. Extension PB1783, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Struve DK, Ferrini F, Fini A, Pennati L. 2009. Relative growth and water use of seedlings from three Italian Quercus species. Arboricult Urban For. 35:113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Sympson C, Jacyna S. 2007. Pruning to improve timber quality. Technical Note TN 594. The Scottish Agricultural College. West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG.
   Google Scholar
• Tamási J. 1986. Root location of fruit-trees and its agrotechnical consequences. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest; p. 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tani A, Adduci M, Barbarotti S, Maltoni A, Mariotti B. 2007b. Caratterizzazione morfologica di differenti tipi di postime di Juglans regia L. destinati a piantagioni di arboricoltura da legno (Morphological attributes of different Juglans regia L. stocktype to be used in wood productive plantations). ATTI del V Convegno SISEF Foreste e Società: cambiamenti conflitti sinergie. Grugliasco (TO) 27–30 settembre 2005. Forest@. 4:227–234. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Tani A, Maltoni A, Mariotti B. 2007a. Field performance: risultati su semenzali di farnia (Field performance: results of Q. robur bareroot seedlings). Sherwood. 135:10–13. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Tinus RW. 1978. Production of container-grown hardwoods. Tree Plant Notes. 29:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A. 2008. Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance in Quercus suber L. J Arid Environ. 74:491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakaldimi M, Tsitsoni T, Ganatsas P, Zagas T. 2009. A comparison of root architecture and shoot morphology between naturally regenerated and container-grown seedlings of Quercus ilex. Plant Soil. 324:103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valmerali T, Mosca G, editors. 2000. Obiettivo radice. Metodi di studio e risultati ottenuti in ambiente mediterraneo. (Focus on root system. Methods and results in Mediterranean environment) Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Agronomia Ambientale e Produzioni Vegetali. C.L.E.U.P. Cooperativa Libraria Università di Padova, Padova; p. 203. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Villar-Salvador P, Planelles R, Enríquez E, Peñuelas Rubira J. 2004. Nursery cultivation regimes, plant functional attributes, and field performance relationships in the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex L. For Ecol Manag. 196:257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar-Salvador P, Puertolas J, Cuesta B, Peñuelas JL, Uscola M, Heredia-Guerrero N, Rey Benaya JM. 2012. Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New For. 43:755–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Peñuelas JL. 2010. Assessing morphological and physiological plant quality for Mediterranean woodland restoration projects. In: Susana B, James A, Ramón V, editors. Land restoration to combat desertification: innovative approaches, quality control and project evaluation. Valencia: Fundación CEAM; p. 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• von Felten S, Schmid B. 2008. Complementarity among species in horizontal versus vertical rooting space. J Plant Ecol. 1:33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wann SR, Rakestraw JL. 1998. Maximizing hardwood plantation productivity in the southeastern United States—lessons learned from loblolly pine. Conference proceedings, December 1–3. In: Ek, AR, ZumBahlen B, Compilers and editors, Improving forest productivity for timber, a key to sustainability, University of Minnesota, Duluth, St Paul, MN, USA (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Williams E, Whitcomb CE. 1979. Effects of growing media and container design on growth of tree seedlings. Okla. Agri Exp Sta Res Rpt. 791:40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Williams HM, South DB, Webb A. 1988. Effects of fall irrigation on morphology and root growth potential of Loblolly pine seedlings growing in sand. S Afr For J. 147:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BC, Jacobs DF. 2006. Quality assessment of temperate zone deciduous hardwood seedlings. New For. 31:417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ER, Vitols KC, Park A. 2007. Root characteristics and growth potential of container and bare-root seedlings of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Ontario, Canada. New For. 31:163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar