Modeling and predicting aboveground biomass change in young forest using multi-temporal airborne laser scanner data

References

• Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control. 19:716–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollandsås OM, Gregoire T, Næsset E, Øyen B-H. 2013. Detection of biomass change in a Norwegian mountain forest area using small footprint airborne laser scanner data. Stat Methods Appl. 22:113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollandsås OM, Rekstad I, Næsset E, Rosberg I. 2009. Models for predicting above-ground biomass of Betula pubescens spp. czerepanovii in mountain areas of southern Norway. Scand J For Res. 24:318–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbidge JB, Magee L, Robb AL. 1988. Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. J Am Stat Assoc. 83:123–127. 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadell JG, Kirschbaum MUF, Kurz WA, Sanz M-J, Schlamadinger B, Yamagata Y. 2007. Factoring out natural and indirect human effects on terrestrial carbon sources and sinks. Environ Sci Policy. 10:370–384. 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers JM, Hastie T. 1992. Statistical models in S. Pacific Grove (CA): Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report. FAO forestry paper, vol. 163. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. 1921. Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on “The quantitative analysis of plant growth”. Ann Appl Biol. 7:367–372. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1921.tb05524.x
   Google Scholar
• Gobakken T, Næsset E. 2004. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand J For Res. 19:529–542. 10.1080/02827580410019454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOFC/GOLD. 2014. A sourcebook of methods and procedures for monitoring and reporting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and removals associated with deforestation, gains and losses of carbon stocks in forests remaining forests, and forestation (GOFC-GOLD Report version COP20-1. GOFC-GOLD Land Cover Project Office). Wageningen (The Netherlands): Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger AS. 1968. The interpretation and estimation of Cobb–Douglas functions. Econometrica. 36:464–472. 10.2307/1909517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire TG, Lin QF, Boudreau J, Nelson R. 2008. Regression estimation following the square-root transformation of the response. For Sci. 54:597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson C, Chasmer L, Hall RJ. 2008. The uncertainty in conifer plantation growth prediction from multi-temporal lidar datasets. Remote Sens Environ. 112:1168–1180. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marklund LG. 1988. Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige [Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden (Report 45)]. Umeå: Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Swedish with Summary in English.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Bollandsås OM, Næsset E. 2014. Modeling and estimating change. In: Maltamo M, Næsset E, Vauhkonen J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning – concepts and case studies. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; p. 293–313.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Cohen WB, Næsset E, Stehman SV, Tomppo EO. 2010. Using remotely sensed data to construct and assess forest attribute maps and related spatial products. Scand J For Res. 25:340–367. 10.1080/02827581.2010.497496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsdorf F, Kötz B, Meier E, Itten KI, Allgöwer B. 2006. Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sens Environ. 104:50–61. 10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ. 80:88–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2004a. Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand J For Res. 19:164–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2004b. Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass in boreal forest ecosystems. In: Thies M, Koch B, Spiecker H, Weinacker H, edtiors. Proceedings of the ISPRS working group VIII/2 Laser-scanners for forest and landscape assessment; 2004 October 3–6; Freiburg (Germany); International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVI, Part 8/W2; p. 145–148.
   Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2009. Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens Environ. 113:148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2011. Estimating above-ground biomass in young forests with airborne laser scanning. Int J Remote Sens. 32:473–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Bjerknes KO. 2001. Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens Environ. 78:328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Bollandsås OM, Gobakken T, Gregoire TG, Ståhl G. 2013. Model-assisted estimation of change in forest biomass over an 11 year period in a sample survey supported by airborne LiDAR: a case study with post-stratification to provide “activity data”. Remote Sens Environ. 128:299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T. 2005. Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens Environ. 96:453–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T. 2008. Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser. Remote Sens Environ. 112:3079–3090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T, Solberg S, Gregoire TG, Nelson R, Stahl G, Weydahl D. 2011. Model-assisted regional forest biomass estimation using LiDAR and InSAR as auxiliary data: a case study from a boreal forest area. Remote Sens Environ. 115:3599–3614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Nelson R. 2007. Using airborne laser scanning to monitor tree migration in the boreal–alpine transition zone. Remote Sens Environ. 110:357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström M, Holmgren J, Olsson H. 2013. Change detection of mountain birch using multi-temporal ALS point clouds. Remote Sens Lett. 4:190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørka HO, Næsset E, Bollandsås OM. 2010. Effects of different sensors and leaf-on and leaf-off canopy conditions on echo distributions and individual tree properties derived from airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ. 114:1445–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plugge D, Baldauf T, Rakoto Ratsimba H, Rajoelison G, Köhl M. 2010. Combined biomass inventory in the scope of REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). Madag Conserv Dev. 5:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 409 p.
   Google Scholar
• Richards FJ. 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot. 10:290–301. 10.1093/jxb/10.2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon P. 1991. A ratio estimator for bias correction in logarithmic regressions. Can J For Res. 21:720–724. 10.1139/x91-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Onge B, Vepakomma U. 2004. Assessing forest gap dynamics and growth using multi-temporal laser-scanner data. Int Photogram Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XXXVI:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Thieme N, Bollandsås OM, Gobakken T, Næsset E. 2011. Detection of small single trees in the forest–tundra ecotone using height values from airborne laser scanning. Can J Remote Sens. 37:264–274. 10.5589/m11-041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. 2008. Kyoto Protocol reference manual on accounting of emissions and assigned amounts [cited 2015 Mar 15]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/3145.php
   Google Scholar
• Yu X, Hyyppa J, Kaartinen H, Maltamo M, Hyyppa H. 2008. Obtaining plotwise mean height and volume growth in boreal forests using multi-temporal laser surveys and various change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens. 29:1367–1386. 10.1080/01431160701736489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar