Crookedness of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) growing under a canopy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)

References

• Alméras T, Thibaut A, Gril J. 2005. Effect of circumferential heterogeneity of wood maturation strain, modulus of elasticity and radial growth on the regulation of stem orientation in trees. Trees. 19:457–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolte A, Ammer C, Löf M, Madsen P, Nabuurs GJ, Schall P, Spathelf P, Rock J. 2009. Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scand J Forest Res. 24:473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Oviedo A, Pretzsch H, Ammer C, Andenmatten E, Barbati A, Barreiro S, Brang P, Bravo F, Coll L, Corona P, et al. 2014. European mixed forests: definition and research perspectives. Forest Syst. 23:518–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown CL. 1971. Secondary growth. In: Zimmerman MH, Brown, CL, editors. Trees: structure and function. New York: Springer-Verlag; p. 94–157.
   Google Scholar
• Frost I, Rydin H. 2000. Spatial pattern and size distribution of the animal-dispersed tree Quercus robur in two spruce-dominated forests. Ecoscience. 7:38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzin S, Wiegand K. 2007. Asymmetric tree growth at the stand level: random crown patterns and the response to slope. For Ecol Manag. 242:165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goris R, Kint V, Haneca K, Geudens G, Beeckman H, Verheyen K. 2007. Long-term dynamics in a planted conifer forest with spontaneous ingrowth of broad-leaved trees. Appl Veg Sci. 10:219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J. 2004. Conversion of coniferous forests – will ecological and economic needs meet? EFI News. 12:3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hegyi F. 1974. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: Fries G, editor. Growth models for tree and stand simulation, Research Note 30. Stockholm: Royal College of Forestry; p. 74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JS. 2000. Provenance variation in phenotypic traits in Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Danish Provenance Trials. Scand J For Res. 15:297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JS, Wellendorf H, Jager K, De Vries SMG, Jensen V. 1997. Analysis of a 17-year old dutch open-pollinated progeny trial with Quercus robur (L.). Forest Genet. 4:139–147.
   Google Scholar
• Kenk G, Guehne S. 2001. Management of transformation in central Europe. For Ecol Manag. 151:107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kint V. 2005. Structural development in ageing temperate Scots pine stands. For Ecol Manag. 214:237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kint V, Lasch P, Lindner M, Muys B. 2009. Multipurpose conversion management of Scots pine towards mixed oak–birch stands – a long-term simulation approach. For Ecol Manag. 257:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kint V, Mohren GMJ, Geudens G, De Wulf R, Lust N. 2004. Pathways of stand development in ageing Pinus sylvestris forests. J Veg Sci. 15:549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Ammer Ch, Stimm B, Mosandl R. 2008. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J For Res. 127:89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krahl-Urban J. 1959. Die Eichen [The Oaks]. Hamburg: Paul Parey.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, Espinel S, Jensen J, Kleinschmit J, Van Dam B, et al. 2002. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann For Sci. 59:777–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzaki J, Masumori M, Tange T. 2006. Stem phototropism of trees: a possible significant factor in determining stem inclination on forest slopes. Ann Bot. 98:573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzaki J, Masumori M, Tange T. 2007. Phototropic bending of non-elongating and radially growing woody stems results from asymmetrical xylem formation. Plant Cell Environ. 30:646–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirschel F, Zerbe S, Jansen F. 2011. Driving factors for natural tree rejuvenation in anthropogenic pine Pinus sylvestris L. forests of NE Germany. For Ecol Manag. 261:683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosandl R, Kleinert A. 1998. Development of oaks Quercus petraea Matt./Liebl. emerged from bird-dispersed seeds under old-growth pine Pinus silvestris L. stands. For Ecol Manag. 106:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosandl R, Küssner R. 1999. Conversion of pure pine and spruce forests into mixed forests in eastern Germany: some aspects of silvicultural strategy. In: Olsthoorn AFM, Bartelink HH, Gardiner JJ, Pretzsch H, Hekhuis HJ, Franc A, editors. Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN Sci. Contrib. 15; Wageningen (The Netherlands); p. 208–218.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel J. 1992. Program Stanly 2.0. In: Sloboda B, editor. Modelle zu automatisierten Zuwachsmeß- und Auswerttechniken, klimaorientierte Wachstumsmodelle, Inventurmethoden und ihre Anwendungen [Models for the automated techniques of increment determination and evaluation, climate-oriented growth models, forest inventory methods and their applications]. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt. Frankfurt: J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag; p. 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold AJ, Goldsmith FB. 1981. The regeneration of oak and beech: a literature review. Discussion papers in conservation, 33. University College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Noack M. 2011. Growth and nutrition of Quercus petraea underplanted in artificial pine stands under conversion in the northeastern German Lowlands. Forest Sys. 203:423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluch R. 2005. Odnowienie naturalne dębu w Leśnym Kompleksie Promocyjnym „Puszcza Białowieska” – stan, warunki i perspektywy [Natural regeneration of oak in the “Białowieża Primeval Forest” promotional forest complex – state, conditions and prospects]. Sylwan. 1:30–41. ( In Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Paluch R. 2007. Możliwość i celowość wykorzystania ekspansji dębu w drzewostanach sosnowych do realizacji celów hodowlanych [The possibility and desirability of expanding the use of oak in pine stands to achieve silvicultural objectives]. In: Rutkowski P, editor. Hodowla dębów w Polsce. Wybrane zagadnienia [Oak silviculture in Poland. Selected issues]. Idee Ekologiczne; Poznań 16:83–90. ( In Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Petriţan AM, von Lüpke B, Petriţan IC. 2009. Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech Fagus sylvatica L., maple Acer pseudoplatanus L. and ash Fraxinus excelsior L. saplings. Eur J For Res. 128:61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigan I, Pigan M. 1999. Naturalne odnowienie dębu w drzewostanach sosnowych [Natural regeneration of pedunculate oak in pine]. Sylwan. 9:23–29. ( In Polish)
   Google Scholar
• Reif A, Brucker U, Kratzer R, Schmiedinger A, Bauhus J. 2010. Forest management in times of climate change – synergies and potential conflicts between forestry and nature conservation. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung. 42:261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Robards A. 1966. The application of the modified sine rule to tension wood production and eccentric growth on the stem of Crack Willow Salix fragilis L. Ann Bot. 30:513–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhrig E, Bartsch N, von Lüpke B. 2006. Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage [Silviculture on ecological basis]. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnot E. 1952. Reaction wood and the regulation of tree form. Am J Bot. 39:69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrzyszewski J, Skrzyszewska K. 2004. Species conversion of spruce stands in the Wisła Forest District. Dendrobiology. 51(Suppl.):95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Spiecker H, Hansen J, Klimo E, Skovsgaard JP, Sterba H, von Teuffel K, editors. 2004. Norway Spruce Conversion – options and consequences. European Forest Institute Research Report 18. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Stancioiu PT, O’Hara KL. 2006. Morphological plasticity of regeneration subject to different levels of canopy cover in mixed-species, multiaged forests of the Romanian Carpathians. Trees. 20:196–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatSoft, Inc. 2010. STATISTICA data analysis software system. Version 9.1. www.statsoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Trampler T, Kliczkowska A, Dmyterko E. 1994. A system of natural-forest regionalization of Poland as based on ecological and physiographical principles. Fol For Pol Series A – Forestry. 36:63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hees AFM. 1997. Growth and morphology of pedunculate oak Quercus robur L. and beech Fagus sylvatica L. seedlings in relation to shading and drought. Ann For Sci. 54:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyen K, Lust N, Carnol M, Hens L, Bouma JJ. 2006. Feasibility of forest conversion: ecological, social and economic aspects FEFOCON. Scientific support plan for a sustainable development policy. Report for Belgian Science Policy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Wardrop AB. 1964. Reaction anatomy of arborescent angiosperms. In: Zimmermann MH, editor. Formation of wood in forest trees. New York: Academic Press; p. 405–456.
   Google Scholar
• Węgiel A, Jaszczak R, Rączka G, Strzeliński P, Sugiero D, Wierzbicka A. 2009. An economic aspect of conversion of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. stands in the Polish Lowland. J For Sci. 55:293–298.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BF, Archer RR. 1979. Tree design: some biological solutions to mechanical problems. Bioscience. 29:293–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woś A. 1999. Klimat polski [climate of Poland]. Warszawa: PWN. ( In Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Zerbe S. 2002. Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations. For Ecol Manag. 167:27–42
   Google Scholar