Stand, stem and log segregation based on wood properties: a review

References

• Acuna MA, Murphy GE. 2006. Use of near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis to predict wood density of Douglas-fir from chain saw chips. For Prod J. 56:67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acuna MA, Murphy GE. 2007. Estimating relative log prices of Douglas-fir through a financial analysis of the effects of wood density on lumber recovery and pulp yield. For Prod J. 57:60–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams TH, Goulding CJ. 2011. Harvester-mounted laser scanning to improve log making. N Z Logger. Nov:33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Albert DJ, Clarke TA, Dickson RL, Walker JCF. 2002. Using acoustics to sort radiata pine pulp according to fibre characteristics and paper properties. Int For Rev. 4:12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzamora RM, Apiolaza LA. 2010. A hedonic approach to value Pinus radiata log traits for appearance-grade lumber production. For Sci. 56:281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Amishev D, Murphy GE. 2008. In-forest assessment of veneer grade Douglas-fir logs based on acoustic measurement of wood stiffness. For Prod J. 58:42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amishev D, Murphy GE. 2009. Estimating breakeven prices for Douglas-fir veneer quality logs from stiffness graded stands using acoustic tools. For Prod J. 59:45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An Y, Schajer GS. 2014. Geometry-based CT scanner for measuring logs in sawmills. Comput Electron Agric. 105:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas A, Prieto F, Brancheriau L, Lasaygues P. 2014. Literature review of acoustic and ultrasonic tomography in standing trees. Trees. 28:1559–1567. doi: 10.1007/s00468-014-1062-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya RC, Loerkemeier CF, Sarma S. 2010. Low-cost, ubiquitous RFID-tag-antenna-based sensing. Inst Electric Electron Eng. 98:1593–1600. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2051790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilek EM. 2009. LSY: documentation for a spreadsheet tool to evaluate log-sort yard economics. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-184. Madison (WI): USDA Forest Service; 38 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bill J, Daly A, Johnsen T, Dalen KS. 2012. DendroCT – dendrochronology without damage. Dendrochronologia. 30:223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley C. 1994. Adapting to global supply constraints: timber famine and six reasons why it won't occur. In: Sinclair SA, editor. The globalization of wood: supply, processes, products and markets. Madison, WI: Forest Products Society; p. 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Blinn CR, Sinclair SA. 1986. Profitability of various timber harvesting systems as affected by product sorting and timber stand parameters. North J App For. 3:167–172.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley G, Erickson A, Robbins A, Smith G, Malone L, Rogers L, Connor M. 2007. The future of Washington's forests and forest industries. Study 4. Forest land conversion in Washington State. Seattle (WA): College of Forest Resources, University of Washington; p. 239–302.
   Google Scholar
• Brdicko J. 2009. Feasibility of optimizing log sorting and lumber manufacturing processes by using X-ray scanning to characterize check severity in mountain pine beetle-affected logs. Mountain Pine Beetle Working Paper. Victoria (BC): Natural Resources Canada; 61 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs D. 1989. Tree value system – description and assumptions. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-239. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 24 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs D, Thienel G, Turnblom E, Lowell E, Dykstra D, Ross RJ, Wang X, Carter P. 2008. Estimating wood stiffness along the trees to product chain: tools, relationships and silviculture influences. In: Current research and developments in wood stiffness and other key properties. Vancouver (WA): Western Forestry and Conservation Association; p. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bucur V. 1983. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic constants of wood increment cores bored from living trees. Ultrasonics. 21:116–126. doi: 10.1016/0041-624X(83)90031-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucur V. 2005. Ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive testing of standing trees. Ultrasonics. 43:237–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren C-G, Carlsson D, Ronnqvist M. 2006. Log sorting in forest harvest areas integrated with transportation planning using backhauling. Scand J For Res. 21:260–271. doi: 10.1080/02827580600739021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter P, Briggs D, Ross RJ, Wang X. 2005. Acoustic testing to enhance western forest values and meet customer wood quality needs. In: Harrington CA, Schoenholtz SH, editors. Productivity of western forests – a forest products focus. General Technical Report GTR-PNW-642. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service; p. 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Carter P, Chauhan S, Walker J. 2006. Sorting logs and lumber for stiffness using director HM200. Wood Fib Sci. 38:49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass RD, Baker SA, Dale GW. 2009. Cost and productivity impacts of product sorting on conventional ground-based timber harvesting operations. For Prod J. 35(11/12):108–114.
   Google Scholar
• Chiorescu S, Grönlund A. 2003. The visual grading system for Scots pine logs in relation to the quality of sideboards produced. For Prod J. 53:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorescu S, Grönlund A. 2004. The fingerprint approach: using data generated by a 3D log scanner on debarked logs to accomplish traceability in the sawmill's logyard. For Prod J. 54:269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung W, Venn TJ, Loeffler D, Jones G, Han H-S, Calkin DE. 2012. Assessing the potential for log sort yards to improve financial viability of forest restoration treatments. For Sci. 58:641–651.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ. 1992. Corewood (juvenile wood) in Pinus radiata – should we be concerned? N Z J For Sci. 22:87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ. 2006. Wood quality in standing timber – evolution of assessment methods in plantations. In: Kurjatko S, Kúdela J, Lagaňa R, editors. Wood structure and properties ‘06. Zvolen, Slovakia: Arbora Publishers; p. 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ, Ball RD. 2001. Wood densitometry of 10 Pinus radiata families at seven contrasting sites: influence of tree age, site, and genotype. N Z J For Sci. 31:88–100.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ, Donaldson LA, Downes GM. 2010. A review of resin features in radiata pine. N Z J For Sci. 41:41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ, Hebert J, Ball R. 1999. Modelling Pinus radiata lumber characteristics. Part 1: mechanical properties of small clears. NZ J For Sci. 29:203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Cown DJ, McConchie DL, Young GD. 1991. Radiata pine: wood properties survey. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 50. Revised ed. Rotorua: Forest Research Institute, Ministry of Forestry; 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dale R, Papps S, Daniell WHM. 2006. Economics of stem and log segregation based on internal wood quality characteristics (confidential). Report No. INT 9. Rotorua: WQI Ltd; 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Deadman MW, Goulding CJ. 1979. A method for the assessment of recoverable volume by log types. N Z J For Sci. 9:225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick A. 2010. Log value recovery optimisation as a catalyst for supply chain efficiencies. In: Wood supply chain optimisation 2010 conference, Rotorua. [cited 2014 Oct 21]. Available from: wwwlogjiztixconz/media/Log_value_recovery_case_studiespdf
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson LA. 2008. Microfibril angle: measurement, variation and relationships – a review. IAWA J. 29:345–386. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donavan V. 1988. Logging operations on restricted landings (USA). LIRA Report. N Z Logging Industry Research Association, Volume 13; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dramm JR, Govett R, Bilek E, Jackson GL. 2004. Log sort yard economic, planning and feasibility. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-146. Madison (WI): USDA Forest Service, For Products Laboratory; 31 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra DP, Kuru G, Nussbaum RN. 2003. Technologies for log tracking. Int For Rev. 5:262–267.
   Google Scholar
• dy Olale K, Yenesew A, Jamnadass R, Sila A, Aynekulu E, Kuyah S, Shepherd JF. 2013. Limitations to use of infrared spectroscopy for rapid determination of carbon–nitrogen and wood density for tropical species. Adv Anal Chem. 3:21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Evans R. 2000. SilviScan and its future in wood quality assessment. In: Proceedings of 54th APPITA Annual General Conference; 2000 April 3–6, Melbourne (Australia); p. 271–274.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agricultural Organization. 2012. Global forest products facts and figures. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 17 pp. [cited 2014 Oct 8]. Available from: www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80938/en/
   Google Scholar
• Fight R, Zhang X, Hartsough B. 2003. User's guide for STHARVEST: software to estimate the cost of harvesting small timber. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-582. Portland (OR): USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 18 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Galleguillos-Hart C, Fernández MP, Andrés G. 2010. A portable method to estimate wood basic density from increment cores using spectroscopic techniques. J Near Infr Spectrosc. 18:465–472. doi: 10.1255/jnirs.899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar MJ, Louzada JL, Silva ME, Aguiar A, Almeida MH. 2008. Age trends in genetic parameters of wood density components in 46 half-sibling families of Pinus pinaster. Can J For Res. 38:1470–1477. doi: 10.1139/X08-013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt D. 2012. A revolution in structural timber grading. In: World Conference on Timber Engineering; 2012 Jul 16–19, Auckland; 8 pp. [cited 2015 May 16]. Available from: http://www.timberdesign.org.nz/files/00711%20Douglas%20Gaunt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gingras J-F. 1996. The cost of sorting product during harvesting. Technical Note TN-245. Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada; 12 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras J-F, Favreau J. 2002. The impact of sorting on the productivity of a cut-to-length system. Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada. Advantage. 3(21):4.
   Google Scholar
• Giudiceandrea F, Ursella E, Vicario E. 2011. A high speed CT scanner for the sawmill industry. In: 17th International nondestructive testing and evaluation of wood symposium; 2011 Sept 14–16; Sopron, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum P. 2009. RFID tags applied for tracing timber in the forest products chain. In: Bergstedt A, editor. Proceedings of the 5th meeting of the Nordic-Baltic Network in Wood Material Science and Engineering (WSE): Forest and Landscape, Copenhagen (Denmark); p. 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Häkli J, Sirkka A, Jaakkola K, Puntanen V, Nummila K. 2013. Challenges and possibilities of RFID in the forest industry. In: Reaz MBI, editor. Radio frequency identification from system to applications. [Internet]: In Tech. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/radio-frequency-identification-from-system-to-applications. doi:10.5772/54205
   Google Scholar
• Hall P. 1994. Waste wood at logging landings. Logging Industry Research Organisation, Rotorua. LIRO Report, Volume 19; p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Han H-S, Bilek EM, Dramm R, Loeffler D, Calkin D. 2011. Financial feasibility of a log sort yard handling small diameter logs: a preliminary study. West J App For. 26:174–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JM. 1984. Non-destructive assessment of spiral rain in standing trees. N Z J For Sci. 14:395–399.
   Google Scholar
• Hilker T, Frazer GW, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Newnham GJ, Stewart JD, van Leeuwen M, Culvenor DS. 2013. Prediction of wood fiber attributes from LiDAR-derived forest canopy indicators. For Sci. 59:231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes WS, Cown DJ. 2011. Microwave density measurement of standing trees. In: Funk D, editor. Proceedings 9th conference on electromagnetic wave interaction with water and moist substances; 2011 May 31–June 3; Kansas City (MO); p. 39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Johansson D, Skog J, Fredriksson M. 2013. Automated knot detection for high speed computed tomography on Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. using ellipse fitting in concentric surfaces. Comput Electron Agric. 96:238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliger R, Johansson M. 2004. Pre-sorting of logs prior to conversion improves straightness of sawn timber. Goteburg: Chalmers University of Technology. Report 04–09; 43 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Korpunen S, Mochan S, Uusitalo J. 2010. An activity-based costing method for sawmilling. For Prod J. 60:420–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachenbruch B, Moore JR, Evans R. 2011. Radial variation in wood structure and function in woody plants, and hypotheses for its occurrence. In: Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B, Dawson TE, editors. Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Tree Physiology 4. London: Springer; p. 121–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lähtinen K. 2007. Linking resource-based view with business economics of woodworking industry: earlier findings and future insights. Silva Fennica. 41:149–165. doi: 10.14214/sf.312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark AI, Isebrands JG. 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: a synopsis. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-129. USDA Forest Service, South Forest Experiment Station; 42 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz P, Bernier-Cardou M, Mac J, Beaulieu J. 2012. Can wood properties be predicted from the morphological traits of a tree? A canonical correlation study of plantation-grown white spruce. Can J For Res. 42:1518–1529. doi: 10.1139/x2012-087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell EC, Maguire DA, Briggs DG, Turnblom EC, Jayawickrama KJS, Bryce J. 2014. Effects of silviculture and genetics on branch/knot attributes of coastal Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir and implications for wood quality-a synthesis. Forest. 5:1717–1736. doi: 10.3390/f5071717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren C. 2000. Predicting log type and knot size category using external log shape data from a 3D log scanner. Scand J For Res. 15:119–126. doi: 10.1080/02827580050160556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley B. 2002. Fitness for purpose, wood quality and the value chain. N Z J For. 47:2.
   Google Scholar
• Manley B. 2014. Deforestation survey 2013 final report. MPI Technical Paper 2014/07. Wellington: N Z Ministry of Primary Industries; 15 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield SD, Parish R, Goudie JW, Kang KY, Ott P. 2007. The effects of crown ratio on the transition from juvenile to mature wood production in lodgepole pine in western Canada. Can J For Res. 37:1450–1459. doi: 10.1139/X06-299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson AC, Dickson RL, Spencer DJ, Joe B, Ilic J. 2002. Acoustic segregation of Pinus radiata logs according to stiffness. Ann For Sci. 59:471–477. doi: 10.1051/forest:2002031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Murata K, Ikami Y, Ohmori M, Matsumura J. 2013. Application of the wood properties of large-diameter Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) logs to sorting logs and sawing patterns. J Wood Sci (Japan). 59:271–281. doi: 10.1007/s10086-013-1332-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConchie DL. 2003. Field guide to assist recognition and classification of resinous defects on the bark of radiata pine. Rotorua: WQI Ltd, Report App 12; 35 pp.
   Google Scholar
• McConchie DL, Ridoutt BG. 1997. Resin pockets: strategies for clearwood production in regions. N Z Tree Grower. 18(2):37–39.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald T, Rummer B, Valenzuala J. 2001. Potential for shared log transport services. In: Wang J, Wolford M, McNeel J, editors. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Council on Forest Engineering meeting Council on Forest Engineering, Corvallis (OR); p. 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• McLean PL, Jin Q, Brennan M, Nieuwoudt MK, Harris PJ. 2014. Using NIR and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to rapidly detect compression wood in Pinus radiata. Can J For Res. 44:820–830. dx.doi.org/810.1139/cjfr-2013-0329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JR, Cown DJ, McKinley RB. 2014. Modelling microfibril angle variation in New Zealand-grown radiata pine. N Z J For Sci. 44, Article no.25. doi:10.1186/s40490-40014-40025-40494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JR, Lyon AJ, Searles GJ, Lehneke SA, Ridley-Ellis DJ. 2013. Within- and between-stand variation in selected properties of Sitka spruce sawn timber in the UK: implications for segregation and grade recovery. Ann For Sci. 70:403–415. doi 10.1007/s13595-013-0275-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MPI. 2014. Indicative New Zealand radiata pine log prices. Ministry of Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand. [cited 2014 Oct 18]. Available from: wwwmpigovtnz/news-resources/statistics-forecasting/forestry/indicative-new-zealand-radiata-pine-log-pricesaspx
   Google Scholar
• Murphy GE, Barnett J, Summers B. 2011. Designing value chain improvements for an eastern Oregon poplar plantation using terrestrial laser scanning technology. In: Proceedings of 34th Council on Forest Engineering Conference, Quebec, Canada; 11 pp. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from: https://www.cirrelt.ca/cofe2011/proceedings/28-Murphy%20Barnett%20Summers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murphy GE, Clark JA, Pilkerton S. 2012. Current and potential tagging and tracking systems for logs harvested from Pacific Northwest Forests. West J App For. 27:84–91. doi: 10.5849/wjaf.11-027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy GE, Marshall H, Conradie I. 2003. Market complexity and its effect on variables that gauge the economics of harvesting production. N Z J For Sci. 33:281–292.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy GE, Olsen ED, Sessions J. 1989. Economic comparison of alternative sites for final log manufacturing in steep-country plantations. App Eng Agric. 4:319–323. doi: 10.13031/2013.26626
   Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J. 2009. Applying the activity-based costing to cut-to-length timber harvesting and trucking. Silva Fennica. 43:847–870. doi: 10.14214/sf.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrom J, Grundberg S. 2007. Industrial measurement of spiral grain on debarked sawlogs and prediction of twist on centre planks after drying. In: Van Acker J, Usenius A, editors. Modelling the wood chain: forestry – wood industry – wood products markets. Ghent: Ghent University; p. 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Oja JLW, Grundberg S, Hägerdal E, Grönlund A. 2003. Automatic grading of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sawlogs using an industrial X-ray log scanner. Comput Electron Agric. 41:63–75. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00042-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterburg P. 2009. Wood quality and geometry measurements based on cross section images. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology; 193 pp. Publication 807.
   Google Scholar
• Pont D, Kimberley M, Brownlie R, Morgenroth J, Watt MS. 2015. Tree counts from airborne LIDAR. NZ J For 60(1):38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pont D, Watt MS, Adams T, Marshall H, Lee J, Crawley D, Watt P. 2012. Modelling variation in Pinus radiata stem velocity from area- and crown-based LiDAR metrics. In: SilviLaser 2012; 2012 Sept 16–19; Vancouver, Canada; 8 pp. [cited 2015 Jul 26]. Available from: http://silvilaser2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Silvilaser2012_Full_Proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prestemon JP, Buongiorno J. 2000. Determinants of tree quality and lumber value in natural unevenaged southern pine stands. Can J For Res. 30:211–219. doi: 10.1139/x99-191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond K. 1988. Multiple log sorting with a hydraulic knuckleboom loader. LIRA Report. Rotorua: Logging Industry Research Association . Volume 13; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Riddell M, Cown D, Harrington J, Lee J, Moore J. 2012. Assessing spiral grain angle by light transmission – proof of concept. IAWA J. 33:1–14. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridoutt BG, McConchie DL, Ball RD. 1999. Predicting resin pockets in radiata pine logs from blemishes on log ends. Wood Fib Sci. 31:434–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Lethbridge J, Carreau H. 2004. Changes in the global forest products industry. BC forum on forest economics and policy synthesis paper. SP 04-01. [cited 2014 Oct 15]. Available from: http://conservation-economics.com/pdf_pubs/synth_paper/SP0401_ChangesGlobalForestProd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sall H. 2002. Spiral grain in Norway spruce [dissertation]. Acta Wexionensia No. 22/220 Sweden: Vaxjo University; 171 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schimleck LR, Evans R, Jones PD, Daniels RF, Peter GF, Clark Iii A. 2005. Estimation of microfibril angle and stiffness by near infrared spectroscopy using sample sets having limited wood density variation. IAWA J. 26:175–187. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimleck LR, Mora CR, Peter GF, Evans R. 2010. Alternative methods for nondestructively determining modulus of elasticity in young trees. IAWA J. 31:161–167. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidla A, Uusijarvi R. 2004. Development of code-marking equipment for logs – sensitivity of fluorescent code-mark for log marking environment. In: Papstel J, Katalinic B, editors. Industrial engineering – innovation a competitive edge for SME. 4th International DAAAM Conference, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia; p. 70–73.
   Google Scholar
• Sessions J, Boston K, Hill R, Stewart R. 2005. Log sorting location decisions under uncertainty. For Prod J. 55(12):53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelter H, Alderman M. 2005. Profile 2005: softwood sawmills in the United States and Canada. Research Paper FPL-RP-630. Madison (WI): USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; 85 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Owende PM, Ward SM. 2002. Productivity and cost of CTL harvesting of Eucalyptus globulus stands using excavator-based harvesters. For Prod J. 52(1):67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterlinwood. 2002. Dry-land and water-based log sorts. Report prepared for Economic Development Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Sterling Wood Group, Victoria (British Columbia); 15 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton WRJ. 2014. Save the forests: use more wood. In: Fenning T, editor. Challenges and opportunities for the world's forests in the 21st century. For Sci. 81:213–227. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7076-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg C. 2011. RFID tracks wooden utility poles at the factory and in the field. RFID J. [cited 2015 May 16]. Available from: www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/8291/4
   Google Scholar
• Tian X, Cown DJ. 1995. Modelling wood properties. New Zealand Forest Service, Rotorua, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 201; 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Tian X, Cown DJ, McConchie DL. 1996. Modelling of radiata pine wood properties. Part 2: wood density. N Z J For Sci. 25:214–230.
   Google Scholar
• Timpe D. 2006. RFID in forestry: prospects of an RFID-based log tracking system as an alternative to stamping. Fibre Science and Communication Network, Report 6; 50 pp. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from: www.miun.se/fscn
   Google Scholar
• Tolan AC. 2014. The effect of the number of log sorts on mechanised log processing productivity and value recovery in landing-based cable yarder harvesting operations [dissertation]. Christchurch: University of Canterbury; 75 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tseheye A, Buchanan AH, Walker JCF. 2000. Sorting of logs using acoustics. Wood Sci Techn. 34:337–344. doi: 10.1007/s002260000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE/FAO. 2013. Forest products annual market review, 2012–2013. UNECE/FAO Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2012–2013. Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper 33; 155 pp. [cited 2015 May 15]. Available from: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/FPAMR2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 1965. Southern wood density survey: 1965 status report. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service Research Paper FPL 26, Forest Products Laboratory; 38 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen M, Hilker T, Coops NC, Frazer G, Wulder MA, Newnham GJ, Culvenor DS. 2011. Assessment of standing wood and fiber quality using ground and airborne laser scanning: a review. For Ecol Man. 261:1467–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser R. 2013. Update to the benchmarking database. Harvesting Technical Note No 5. Rotorua: Future Forests Research ; 4 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Visser R, Spinelli R, Maganotti N. 2010. Landing size and landing layout in whole-tree harvesting operations in New Zealand. In: FORMEC 2010 Conference Proceedings, Padova, Italy; 2010 Jul 11–14. [cited 2014 Oct 22]. Available from: http://ircanterburyacnz/bitstream/10092/4397/1/12626356_Landing size NZ FORMEC Paperpdf
   Google Scholar
• Walker J. 2000. Dream merchants: why forestry practices will change. N Z J For. 45:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh D, Strandgard M, Carter P. 2014. Evaluation of the Hitman PH330 acoustic assessment system for harvesters. Scand J For Res. 29:593–602. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.953198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Carter P, Ross RJ, Brashaw BK. 2007. Acoustic assessment of wood quality of raw forest materials – a path to increased profitability. For Prod J. 57:6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ross RJ, Carter P. 2007. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Wood Fib Sci. 39:28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Verrill S, Lowell E, Ross RJ, Herian VL. 2013. Acoustic sorting models for improved log segregation. Wood Fib Sci. 45:343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel R. 2005. University in Munich develops RFID-enabled log harvesting. RFID J. [cited 2014 Oct 24]. Available from: www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/2861/
   Google Scholar
• Wessels C. 2014. The variation and prediction of structural timber properties of standing Pinus patula trees using non-destructive methods [dissertation]. Stellenbosh, South Africa: University of Stellenbosh; 113 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels CB, Malan FS, Nel DG, Rypstra T. 2014. Variation in strength, stiffness and related wood properties in young South African-grown Pinus patula. South For. 76:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels C, Malan F, Rypstra T. 2011. A review of measurement methods used on standing trees for the prediction of some mechanical properties of timber. Euro J For Res. 130:881–893. doi: 10.1007/s10342-011-0484-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall JA. 2013. Prediction of standing tree defect proportion using logistic regression and ordered decision thresholds. Can J For Res. 43:1085–1091. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielinga B, Raymond CA, James R, Matheson AC. 2009. Effect of green density values on Pinus radiata stiffness estimation using a stress-wave technique. N Z J For Sci. 39:71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Woodweek. 2014. Call for less log sorts. Woodweek 26 June 2014. [cited 2014 Oct 18]. Available from: www.woodweek.com/indexcfm?id=290#4
   Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Xu JM, Li GY, Risto V, Lu ZH, Li BQ, Wang W. 2010. Use of the pilodyn for assessing wood properties in standing trees of Eucalyptus clones. J For Res. 21:68–72. doi: 10.1007/s11676-010-0011-5
   Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Qin M, Ni Y, Defo M, Dalpke B, Sherson G. 2011. Predictions of wood density and module of elasticity of balsam fir (Abies balsamea) and black spruce (Picea mariana) from near infrared spectral analyses. Can J For Res. 41:352–358. doi: 10.1139/X10-215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar