418
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Exploring the use of a dialogue process to tackle a complex and controversial issue in forest management

, , , , &
Pages 749-756 | Received 25 Jun 2014, Accepted 18 Jun 2015, Published online: 14 Aug 2015

References

  • Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S. 2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl. 1:95–111. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x
  • Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 18:543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
  • Appell D. 2009. Can “Assisted Migration” save species from global warming? Scientific American, March. Available from: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/assited-migration-global-warming/
  • Biddle JC, Koontz TM. 2014. Goal specificity: a proxy measure for improvements in environmental outcomes in collaborative governance. J Environ Manage. 145:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.029
  • Blackmore C, editor. 2010. Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer.
  • Blackmore C, Ison R, Jiggins J. 2007. Social learning: an alternative policy instrument for managing in the context of Europe's water. Environ Sci Policy. 10:493–498. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.003
  • Bos JJ, Brown RR, Farrelly MA. 2013. A design framework for creating social learning situations. Global Environ Change. 23:398–412. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.003
  • Bradshaw HW, Holmqvist BH, Cowling SA, Sykes MT. 2000. The effect of climate change on the distribution and management of Picea abies in southern Scandinavia. Can J For Res. 30:1992–1998. doi: 10.1139/x00-130
  • Bull R, Petts J, Evans J. 2008. Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? J Env Plan Mgt. 51:701–716. doi: 10.1080/09640560802208140
  • Craig RA, Gunderson LH. 2011. Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. J Env Mgt. 92:1379–1384. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.063
  • Daniels SE, Walker GB. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Diduck A, Dinclair JS, Hostetler G, Fitzpatrick P. 2012. Transformative learning theory, public involvement, and natural resource and environmental management. J Env Mgt. 55:1311–1330.
  • Dryzek JS. 2002. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Felton A, Boberg J, Björkman C, Widenfalk O. 2013. Identifying and managing the ecological risks of using introduced tree species in Sweden's production forestry. For Ecol Mgt. 307:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.059
  • Fisher F. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sci. 26:165–187. doi: 10.1007/BF00999715
  • Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Naubuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE. 2003. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat Cli Change. 3:203–207. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1687
  • Hemström K, Mahapatra K, Gustavsson L. 2013. Swedish private forest owners’ perceptions and intentions with respect to adopting exotic tree species. Eur J For Res. 132:433–444. doi: 10.1007/s10342-013-0682-5
  • Hewitt N, Klenk N, Smith AL, Bazely DR, Yan N, Wood S, Henriques I. 2011. Taking stock of the assisted migration debate. Biol Cons. 144:2560–2572. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.031
  • Kates RW. 2011. What kind of a science is sustainability science? Pro Nat Acad Sci. 108:19449–19450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116097108
  • Kellomäki S, Kai-Yun W, Lemettinen M. 2012. Controlled environment chambers for investigating tree response to elevated CO2 and temperature under boreal conditions. Photosynthetica. 38:69–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1026795924459
  • Kjær Dahl E, Lobo A, Myking T. 2014. The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scan J For Res. 29:323–332. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926098
  • Lindbladh M, Axelsson AL, Hultberg T, Brunet J, Felton A. 2014. From broadleaves to spruce – the borealization of southern Sweden. Scan J For Res. 29:686–696. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.960893
  • Maiello A, Viegas C, Frey M, Rbeiro J-L. 2013. Public managers as catalysts of knowledge co-production? Investigating knowledge dynamics in local environmental policy. Env Sc Pol. 27:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.007
  • Marris E. 2011. Rambunctious garden: saving nature in a post-wild world. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Mascaro J, Hughes RF, Schnitzer S. 2012. Novel forests maintain ecosystem processes after the decline of native tree species. Ecol Mgt. 82:221–228.
  • Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bharwani S, Ziervogel G, Walker B, Birkmann J, Van der Leeuw S, Rockström J, et al. 2010. Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc. 15:11. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/
  • Mostert E, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y, Searle B, Tabara D, Tippett J. 2007. Social earning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecol Soc. 12. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/
  • Muro M, Jeffery P. 2008. A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. J Env Plan Mgt. 51:325–344. doi: 10.1080/09640560801977190
  • Norton BG. 2005. Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Pahl-Wostl C. 2002. Towards sustainability in the water sector: the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aq Sc. 64:394–411. doi:10.1007/PL00012594
  • Parks CG, Bernier P, Bytnerowicz A, Hånell B. 2010. Adaptation of forests and forest management to changing climate with emphasis on forest health: A review of science, policies and practices. Special issue. For Ecol Mgt. 259:657–659. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(09)00903-7
  • Pettersson M, Keskitalo C. 2012. Forest invasive species and climate change – EU and Swedish regulatory frameworks. Env Pol Law. 42:63–73.
  • Richardson DM, Rejmanek M. 2011. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Divers Distrib. 17:788–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x
  • Rist S, Chiddambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesemann U. 2006. “It was hard to come to mutual understanding … ”—the multidimensionality of social learning processes concerned with natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. Sys Prac Act Res. 19:219–237. doi:10.1007/s11213–006-9014-8
  • Rodela R. 2013. The social learning discourse: trends, themes and interdisciplinary influences in current research. Env Sc Pol. 25:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.002
  • Rogers E, Weber EP. 2010. Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. Am R Pub Adm. 40:546–567. doi: 10.1177/0275074009359024
  • Rotherham I, Lambert R, editors. 2011. Invasive & introduced plants & animals: human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. London & Washington, DC: Earthscan.
  • Simberloff D. 2013. Invasive species: what everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Simberloff D, Rejmánek M, editors. 2011. Encyclopedia of biological invasions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Sol J, Beers P, Wals A. 2013. Social learning in regional innovation networks: trust, commitment and reframing as emergent properties of interaction. J Cl Prod. 49:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.041
  • Thorpe J, Henderson N, Vandall J. 2006. Ecological and policy implications of introducing exotic trees for adaption to climate change in Western boreal forest (Saskatchewan research council publication 11776–1E06). Available from: http://www.adaption.nrcan.gc.ca/pdf/29a4a56f96a347039fb43792635d8f44_e-pdf
  • Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger R. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Env Mgt. 27:435–450. doi:10.1007/s002670010160
  • Wilner K, Wiber M, Charles A, Kearney J, Landry M, Wilson L. 2012. Transformative learning for better resource management: the role of critical reflection. J Env Pl Mgt. 55:1331–1347. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.646679

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.