The impact of road geometry and surface roughness on fuel consumption of logging trucks

References

• Ahlin K, Granlund J, Lindström F. 2004. Comparing road profiles with vehicle perceived roughness. Int J Veh Des. 36:270–286. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2004.005360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André M, Keller M, Sjödin Å, Gadrat M, Crae I, Dilara P. 2009. The Artemis European tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions. Proc. 18th International Emission Inventories Conference, April 14–17, Baltimore (MD).
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T. 2012. Forestry costs and revenues 2011 – major increase in costs. Skogforsk, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala (Sweden). Resultat 6, 4 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T, Enström J, Löfroth C. 2009. Roundwood haulage rigs drink 5.8 litres per 10 km. Skogforsk – The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala (Sweden). Resultat 5, 4 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cenek P, Herrington P, Henderson R, Holland B, Walton IMD. 2011. High-stress corners. Wellington (New Zealand): NZ Transport Agency. NZ Transport Agency Report 466, 58 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS. 2013. Regression analysis by example. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. 424 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ecotraffic. 1999. Inverkan av körsätt på bränsleförbrukning och avgasemissioner [Impact of driving style on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions]. Stockholm (Sweden): Ecotraffic R&D.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2013. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Environment Agency. Technical report, 26 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe L, Leydesdorff L. 2009. The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 60:1027–1036. doi: 10.1002/asi.21009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands (CA): Environmental System Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Flisberg P, Lidén B, Rönnqvist M, Selander J. 2012. Route selection for best distances in road databases based on drivers’ and customers’ preferences. Can J For Res. 42:1126–1140. doi: 10.1139/x2012-063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg M. 2002. Transmitt – Driftstatistik och vägstandardens påverkan på bränsleförbrukningen [Operating statistics and road standard impact on fuel consumption]. Uppsala (Sweden): Skogforsk – The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Arbetsrapport 515, 35 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg M, Löfroth C. 2002. Transmitt – Förarnas påverkan på bränsleförbrukning och utbildning i sparsam körning [The drivers’ impact on fuel consumption and eco-driving training]. Uppsala (Sweden): Skogforsk – The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Arbetsrapport 35 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg M, Löfroth C, Thor M. 2002. Improved efficiency in forest haulage using integrated information technology (TRANSMIT). Stockholm (Sweden): VINNOVA, Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems. 70 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson S, Hallgren P, Christoffersson P. 2011. Anvisningar för projektering och byggande av skogsbilvägar klass 3 och 4 [Instructions for design and construction of forest roads class 3 and 4]. Jönköping (Sweden): Skogsstyrelsen, Swedish Forestry Board. 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hamache V. 2013. Dynamic ground clearance. Linköping (Sweden): Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University. LIU-IEI-TEK-A-13/01643-SE, 81 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström E. 2007. Look-ahead control of heavy trucks utilizing road topography. Linköping (Sweden): Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University. Thesis No. 1319, 100 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Huang W, Bevly DM. 2010. Evaluation of 3D road geometry based heavy truck fuel optimisation. Int J Veh Auton Syst. 8:39–55. doi: 10.1504/IJVAS.2010.034098
   Google Scholar
• Hunt S, Odhams A, Roebuck R, Cebon D. 2011. Parameter measurement for heavy-vehicle fuel consumption modelling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt D J Automobile Eng. 225:567–589. doi: 10.1177/2041299110394512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe I. 2002. Principal component analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag. 488 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson P, Hultqvist B-Å. 2009. Mätning av bränsleförbrukning på asfalt- och betongbeläggning norr om Uppsala [Measurement of fuel consumption on asphalt and concrete pavement north of Uppsala]. Linköping (Sweden): VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTI notat 31-2008, 24 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M, Gårdhagen R, Ekman P, Söderblom D, Löfroth C. 2015. Aerodynamics of timber trucks – a wind tunnel investigation. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191 10.4271/2015-01-1562, 5 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Laurell H. 1985. Körsättets betydelse för bränsleförbrukningen [The impact of driving style on fuel consumption]. Linköping (Sweden): VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTIrapport, 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ljubic DA, Nader J, Provencher Y. 1989. Energy consumption of heavy road vehicles: field parameter measurements and cross-impact analysis. Quebec (Canada): FERIC, Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada. Transport Canada Publication, 44 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Löfroth C. 2014. Skogsbilvägar [Forest roads]. Uppsala (Sweden): Skogforsk – The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Handledning, 101 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson A. 2011. Ekonomisk värdering av användandet av underbett på timmerbilar [An economic evaluation of truck-mounted scrapers for road maintenance]. Umeå (Sweden): Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Arbetsrapport 338, 26 pp.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack RJ. 1990. Measuring and evaluating log truck performance in a variety of operating conditions. Blacksburg (VA): Department of Forestry, Virginia Tech,. 138 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nader J. 1991. Measurement of the impact of driving technique on fuel consumption: preliminary results. Quebec (Canada): FERIC, Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada. Technical Note TN-172, 6 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Oberscheider M, Zazgornik J, Henriksen CB, Gronalt M, Hirsch P. 2013. Minimizing driving times and greenhouse gas emissions in timber transport with a near-exact solution approach. Scand J For Res. 28:493–506. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2012.758309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiyu L, O'Reilly R. 1987a. Improving road pavement – how will it improve truck performance? Rotorua (New Zealand): LIRA. Technical Release 6, 4 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Peiyu L, O’Reilly R. 1987b. Predicting speed and fuel consumption of the log trucks in New Zealand. New Zealand Roading Symposium, Wellington (New Zealand): National Roads Board.
   Google Scholar
• du Plessis HW, Schmermers G. 1989. Fuel savings for commercial vehicles as a result of improvements to road surface conditions. 5th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa, June 5–9 (Swaziland).
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg U. 1990. Road macro- and megatexture influence on fuel consumption. First International Conference on Surface Characteristics, June 8–9, State College (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Sävenhed H. 1987. Samband mellan vägyta och bränsleförbrukning på grusvägar [Relationship between the road surface and the fuel consumption on gravel roads]. Linköping (Sweden): VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTIrapport 235, 28 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers MW, Karamihas SM. 1998. The little book of profiling. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 102 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Segel L, Xiao-Pei L. 1982. Vehicular resistance to motion as influenced by road roughness and high way alignment. Aust Road Res. 12:211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Sjödin Å, Jerksjö M, Sandström C, Erlandsson L, Almén J, Ericsson E, Larsson H, Hammarström U, Mohammed-Reza Y, Johansson H. 2009. Implementering av ARTEMIS road model i Sverige [Implementation of the ARTEMIS road model in Sweden]. Göteborg (Sweden): IVL, Swedish Environmental Research Institute. IVL Rapport B1831, 55 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sumitsawan P, Ardekani SA, Romanoschi SA. 2009. Effect of pavement type on fuel consumption and emissions. Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, August 20–21, Ames (IA): Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Surcel M-D, Michaelsen J. 2010. Evaluation of tractor-trailer rolling resistance reducing measures. Chicago (IL): SAE International. SAE 2010 Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1917, 14 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Greenhouse gas emission inventories 1990–2011 – submitted under the United Nations framework convention on climate change and the Kyoto protocol. Stockholm (Sweden): National Inventory Report, 427 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 2008. NVDB Contents – overview. , Borlänge (Sweden): Swedish Road Administration. NVDB Contents, 14 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P. 1990. The relative fuel efficiency of super-single, low profile and standard tyres on logging trailers. Rotorua (New Zealand): LIRA, New Zealand Logging Industry Research Association, Report 48, 5 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor GW, Farrell P, Woodside A. 2002. Additional analysis of the effect of pavement structure on truck fuel consumption. Woodlawn (Canada): G.W. Taylor Consulting. Final report 39 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wong JY. 2008. Theory of ground vehicles. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. 592 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Zaniewski JP, Moser B, De Morais PJ, Kaeschagen RL. 1979. Fuel consumption related to vehicle type and road conditions. Low Volume Roads: Second International Conference, Washington (DC): TRB, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar