Climate risks and forest practices: forest owners' acceptance of advice concerning climate change

References

• Appelstrand M. 2012. Developments in Swedish forest policy and administration: from a “policy of restriction” towards a “policy of cooperation”. Scand J For Res. 27:186–199. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.635069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin A. 2003. The nature of the boreal forest: governmentality and forest-nature. Space Cult. 6:415–428. doi: 10.1177/1206331203253189
   Google Scholar
• Beck U. 2009. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg B. 2001. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Blennow K. 2008. Risk management in Swedish forestry – policy formation and fulfilment of goal. J Risk Res. 11:237–254. doi: 10.1080/13669870801939415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennow K. 2012. Adaptation of forest management to climate change among private individual forest owners in Sweden. For Pol Econ. 24:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennow K, Persson J, Tome M, Hanewinkel M. 2012. Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS ONE. 7(11):e50182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean M. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Death C. 2010. Counter-conducts: a Foucauldian analytics of protest. Soc Mov Stud. 9:235–251. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2010.493655
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson H. 2007. Svenskt skogsbruk möter klimatförändringar [Swedish forestry encounters climate change] [Internet]. Jönköpnig: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 Apr 21]. Available from: http://shop.textalk.se/shop/9098/art39/4646139-c7eee1-1785.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L. 2014. Risk perception and responses among private forest owners in Sweden. Small-scale For. 13:483–500. doi: 10.1007/s11842-014-9266-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton A, Ellingson L, Andersson E, Drössler L, Blennow K. 2010. Adapting production forests in southern Sweden to climate change. Int J Clim Change Strat Manage. 2:84–97. doi: 10.1108/17568691011020274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Pol Sci. 9(2):127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1994. Living in a post-traditional society. In Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (editors). Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press; p. 59–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D. 2012. Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo C. 2008. Vulnerability and adaptive capacity in forestry in northern Europe: a Swedish case study. Clim Change. 87:219–234. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9337-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson M. 2013a. Klimatförändringen – ny utmaning för skogsbruket [Climate change – a new challenge to forestry]. SkogsEko. No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson M. 2013b. Därför behövs blandskogarna [Therefore we need mixed forests]. SkogsEko. No. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. 1997. Trains of thought: piaget, formalism and the fifth dimension. Common Knowl. 6:170–191.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Löfmarck E. 2015. Managing uncertainty. Forest professionals’ claim and epistemic authority in the face of societal and climate change. Risk Man. 17(3):145–164. doi: 10.1057/rm.2015.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Sjödin D. 2014. Why do forest owners fail to heed warnings? Conflicting risk evaluations made by the Swedish Forest Agency and forest owners. Scand J For Res. 29:274–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Soneryd L, Uggla Y. 2005. Knowledge, power and control: studying environmental regulation in late modernity. J Environ Pol Plan. 7:89–106. doi: 10.1080/15239080500338473
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Sundqvist G. 2013. The sociology of risk. In Roeser S, Hillerbrand R, Sandin P, Persson M (editors). Essentials of risk theory. New York: Springer; p. 75–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D. 1999. Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. 2002. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer M. 2010. The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun. 32:118–127. doi: 10.1177/1075547009359797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar C, Stephenson N, Stephens S. 2007. Climate change and forests in the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl. 17:2145–2151. doi: 10.1890/06-1715.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose N. 1999. Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin H, Rubin I. 2005. Qualitative interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2014. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry 2014. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015a. Vår uppgift [Our task] [Internet]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 May 5]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Myndigheten/Om-oss/Vart-uppdrag/
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015b. Our task [Internet]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/en/AUTHORITY/About-us/Our-task/
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015c. Skogsstyrelsen. Årsredovisning 2014 [Swedish Forest Agency: annual report 2014]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015d. Klimatanpassa ditt skogsbruk [Climate-adapt your forestry] [Internet]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 May 8]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Aga-och-bruka/Skogsbruk/Skota-skog-/Klimatanpassning/
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015e. Klimatet ändras [Climate is changing] [Internet]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 May 8]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Myndigheten/Skog-och-miljo/Skog-och-klimat1/Vad-hander-med-klimatet/
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2015f. Skogsbruksplan – stormanpassad [Forestry plan – storm-adapted] [Internet]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency. [cited 2015 May 8]. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Produkter--Tjanster/UTBUD/SKOGLIGA-PLANER/Stormanpassad-plan/
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2009:1393. 2009. Förordning (2009:1393) med instruction för Skogsstyrelsen [Decree (2009:1393) with instruction for the Swedish Forest Agency]. Swedish Code of Statutes.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 2000. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Soneryd L, Uggla Y. 2015. Green governmentality and responsibilization: new forms of governance and responses to ‘consumer responsibility’. Environ Pol. 24:913–931. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1055885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vulturius G, Gerger Swartling Å. 2015. Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: experiences with Swedish stakeholders. Scand J For Res. 30:217–225. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.1002218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar