Functions for estimating belowground and whole tree biomass of birch in Norway

References

• Antón-Fernández C, Astrup R. 2012. Empirical harvest models and their use in regional business-as-usual scenarios of timber supply and carbon stock development. Scand J Res. 27:379–392. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.644576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson MD. 1992. Betula pendula Roth (B. verrucosa Ehrh.) and B. pubescens Ehrh. J Ecol. 80:837–870. doi: 10.2307/2260870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson MD, Jervis AP, Sangha RS. 1997. Discrimination between Betula pendula, Betula pubescens, and their hybrids using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Can J For Res. 27:1896–1900. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-27-11-1896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijak S, Zasada M, Bronisz A, Bronisz K, Czajkowski M, Ludwisiak L, Tomusiak R, Wojtan R. 2013. Estimating coarse roots biomass in young silver birch stands on post-agricultural lands in central Poland. Silva Fennica. 47:1–14. doi: 10.14214/sf.963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown S. 2002. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut. 116:363–372. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00212-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia. 111:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s004420050201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexhage M, Colin F. 2001. Estimating root system biomass from breast-height diameters. Forestry. 74:491–497. doi: 10.1093/forestry/74.5.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan N. 1983. Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc. 78:605–610. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finér L. 1989. Biomass and nutrient cycle in fertilized and unfertilized pine, mixed birch and pine spruce stands on a drained mire. Acta Forestalia Fennica. 208:1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Flewelling JW, Pienaar LV. 1981. Multiplicative regression with lognormal errors. For Sci. 27:281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Helmisaari H-S, Makkonen K, Kellomäki S, Valtonen E, Mälkönen E. 2002. Below- and above-ground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manag. 165:317–326. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00648-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, and Tanabe K. Published: IGES.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci. 49:12–35.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson T. 2007. Biomass production and allometric above- and below-ground relations for young birch stands planted at four spacings on abandoned farmland. Forestry. 80:41–52. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpl049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelvik S. 1974. Primærproduksjonen i en subalpin bjørkeskog på Maurset i Øvre-Eidfjord, Hordaland [Primary production in a subalpine birch forest in Maurset in Øvre-Eidfjord municipality, Hordaland county] [dissertation]. Ås: Norwegian Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz WA, Beukema SJ, Apps MJ. 1996. Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector. Can J For Res. 26:1973–1979. doi: 10.1139/x26-223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Kurz WA, Apps MJ, Beukema SJ. 2003. Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP. Can J For Res. 33:126–136. doi: 10.1139/x02-165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melson SL, Harmon ME, Fried JS, Domingo JB. 2011. Estimates of live-tree carbon stores in the Pacific Northwest are sensitive to model selection. Carbon Balance Manag. 6:1–16. doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-6-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS. 2006. Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biol. 12:84–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parresol BR. 1999. Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons. For Sci. 45:573–593.
   Google Scholar
• Parresol BR. 2001. Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations. Can J For Res. 31:865–878. doi: 10.1139/x00-202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peichl M, Arain MA. 2007. Allometry and partitioning of above – and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For Ecol Manag. 253:68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson H, Holm S, Ståhl G, Alger D, Fridman J, Lehtonen A, Lundström A, Mäkipää R. 2012. Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass – A comparative study. For Ecol Manag. 270:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson H, Ståhl G. 2006. Functions for below-ground biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21:84–93. doi: 10.1080/14004080500486864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. 2012. NLME: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3. 1–104. The R Development Core Team.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Uhl E, Biber P, Schütze G, Coates KD. 2012. Change of allometry between coarse root and shoot of Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta DOUGL. ex. LOUD) along a stress gradient in the sub-boreal forest zone of British Columbia. Scand J For Res. 27:532–544. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2012.672583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Repola J. 2008. Biomass equations for birch in Finland. Silva Fennica. 42:605–624. doi: 10.14214/sf.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson AP, Hamann JD. 2010. Forest analytics with R: an introduction. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. 2004. Scaling the depths: below-ground allocation in plants, forests and biomes. Funct Ecol. 18:290–295. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00849.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santantonio D, Hermann RK, Overton WS. 1977. Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. Pedobiologia. 17:1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sit V, Poulin-Costello M. 1994. Catalog of curves for curve fitting: biometrics information handbook series. W Bergerud, Sit V. Victoria, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Smith A, Granhus A, Astrup R, Bollandsås OM, Petersson H. 2014. Functions for estimating aboveground biomass of birch in Norway. Scand J For Res. 29:565–578. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.951389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand L, Braastad H. 1967. Høydekurver for bjørk [Height curves for birch]. Meddelelser fra det Norske Skogforsøksvesen. 22:291–302. [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JMG. 1986. The retransformed mean after a fitted power transformation. J Am Stat Assoc. 81:114–118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uri V, Lõhmus K, Ostonen I, Tullus H, Lastik R, Vildo M. 2007. Biomass production, foliar and root characteristics and nutrient accumulation in young silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) stand growing on abandoned agricultural land. Eur J For Res. 126:495–506. doi: 10.1007/s10342-007-0171-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varik M, Aosaar J, Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Uri V. 2013. Carbon and nitrogen accumulation in belowground tree biomass in a chronosequence of silver birch stands. For Ecol Manag. 302:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Bloomfield J. 1998. Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil. 200:71–89. doi: 10.1023/A:1004313515294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JR, Letchford T, Comeau P, Kimmins JP. 2000. Above- and below-ground biomass and nutrient distribution of a paper birch and subalpine fir mixed-species stand in the Sub-Boreal Spruce zone of British Columbia. For Ecol Manag. 130:17–26. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00193-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth C, Schumacher J, Schulze E-D. 2004. Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiol. 24:121–139. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wutzler T, Wirth C, Schumacher J. 2008. Generic biomass functions for Common beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Central Europe: predictions and components of uncertainty. Can J Res. 38:1661–1675. doi: 10.1139/X07-194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar