Ecosystem services in Swedish forests

References

• Akselsson C, Westling O, Sverdrup H, Holmqvist J, Thelin G, Uggla E, Malm G. 2007. Impact of harvest intensity on long-term base cation budgets in Swedish forest soils. WASP. 7(1–3):201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari F, Jacobsen JB, Strange N, Helles F. 2014. Revealing lay people’s perceptions of forest biodiversity value components and their application in valuation method. Global Ecol Conserv. 1:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BelandLindahl K, Westholm E. 2010. Food, paper, wood, or energy? Global trends and future Swedish forest use. Forests. 2(1):51–65. (In Swedish) doi: 10.3390/f2010051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12:1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff A, Marcussen J, Reiten T. 2007. Friluftsliv og helse. En kunskapsoversikt. Høgskolen i Telemark. Institut for idrett og friluftslivsfag, Bø. 66 sidor (In Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Bolin K, Lindgren B. 2006. Fysisk inaktivitet – produktionsbortfall och sjukvårdskosnader. Svenskt Friluftsliv, 44 sidor (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Boman M, Mattsson L, Ericsson G, Kriström B. 2011. Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited. Environ Resour Econ. 50:515–530. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9480-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommarco R, Lundin O, Smith HG, Rundlöf M. 2012. Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc Biol Sci. 279(1727):309–315. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 320:1444–1449. doi: 10.1126/science.1155121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostedt G, Mattsson L. 1995. The value of forests for tourism in Sweden. Ann Turism Res. 22(3):671–680. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(95)00007-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgeland WT, Beier P, Kolb T, Whitham TG. 2010. A conditional trophic cascade: birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants. Ecology. 91(1):73–84. doi: 10.1890/08-1821.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai M, Pettenella D, Vidale E. 2011. Income generation from wild mushrooms in marginal rural areas. For Policy Econ. 13:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciais P, Schelhaas MJ, Zaehle S, Piao SL, Cescatti A, Liski J, Luyssaert S, Le-Maire G, Schulze E-D, Bouriaud O, et al. 2008. Carbon accumulation in European forests. Nat Geosci. 1:425–429. doi: 10.1038/ngeo233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson P. 1994. Miljöjusterade Nationalräkenskaper för den Svenska Skogen Åren 1987 och 1991. Report 108. Umeå: Department of Forest Economics, SLU (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Framstad E, Berglund H, Gundersen V, Heikkila R, Lankinen N, Peltola T, Risbøl O, Weih M. 2009. Increased biomass harvesting for bioenergy: effects on biodiversity, landscape amenities and cultural heritage values. Copenhagen: TemaNord.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman P. 1995. The existence of existence value – a study of the economic benefits of an endangered species. J Forest Econ. 1(3):307–328.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman P, Karlsson S-E, Romild U, Sandell K. 2008a. Vara i naturen – varför eller varför inte? Rapport 2. Friluftsliv i förändring (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Fredman P, Karlsson S-E, Romild U, Sandell K. 2008b. Vilka är ute i naturen? Delresultat från en nationell enkät om friluftsliv och naturturism i Sverige. Rapport nr 1. ISBN 978-91-86073-06-0 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Fredman P, Stenseke M, Sandell K, Mossing A. 2013. Friluftsliv i förändring. Resultat från ett forskningsprogram. Slutrapport. Naturvårdsverket Rapport 6547. ISBN 978-91-620-6547-8 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors U, editor. 2000. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2000. ArtDatabanken, SLU. (In Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen V, Frivold LH. 2008. Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For Urban Gree. 7:241–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Haines LW, Maki TE, Sanderford SG. 1975. The effect of mechanical site preparation treatments on soil productivity and tree (Pinus taeda L. and P. elliottii Engelm. Var. elliottii) growth. In: Bernier B, Winget CH, editors. Forest soils and forest land management. Quebec (Canada): University of Laval Press; p. 379–395.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young R, Potschin M. 2010. Proposal for a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Goods and Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Background Document. Report to the EEA (21 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen KB, Nielsen TS. 2005. Natur og grønne områder forebygger stress. Skov & Landskab. ISBN 87-7903-240-0 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Hartig T. 2003. I naturen sjunker blodtrycket. Skog & Forskning 2003 nr 2 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Hultkrantz L. 1991. Guld och gröna skogar – miljömodifierade nationalräkenskaper för inkomster från skogstillgångarna. I: SOU 1991:38: Räkna med miljön! Förslag till natur och miljöräkenskaper. Allmänna Förlaget (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Hyvönen R, Ågren GI, Linder S, Persson T, Cotrufo F, Ekblad A, Freeman M, Grelle A, Janssens IA, Jarvis PG, et al. 2007. The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol. 173:463–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01967.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaenson TGT, Hjertqvist M, Lundkvist Å. 2012. År 2011 toppar TBE incidensen. Rådjursstammens variation i storlek och vädret är nyckelfaktorer. Läkartidningen. 7:343–346. (In Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Johansson P-O. 1989. Valuing public goods in a risky world: an experiment. In: Folmer H, van Lerland EC, editors. Valuation methods and policy making in environmental economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston JM, Crossley DA, Jr. 2002. Forest ecosystem recovery in the southeast US: soil ecology as an essential component of ecosystem management. For Ecol Manag. 155:187–203. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00558-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong J, Akselsson C, Berglund H, Egnell G, Gerhardt K, Lönnberg L, Olsson B, von Stedingk H. 2012. Konsekvenser av ett ökat uttag av skogsbränsle. En syntes från Energimyndighetens bränsleprogram 2007–2011. ER 2012:08. Energimyndigheten (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson L, Uddstål R. 2002. En beskrivning av den svenska skogsbärsbranschen. SLU, Skog & Trä 2002:1. ISBN 91-973519-5-4 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Kairos Future. 2005. Kund-och intressentanalys. Stockholm: Kairos Future AB. (In Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen E, Sarjala T, Raitio H. 2010. Promoting human health through forests: overview and major challenges. Environ Health Prev Med. 15:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12199-008-0069-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Liski J, Nabuurs G-J, Eggers T, Lapveteläinen T, Kaipainen T. 2003. Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget. Forest Policy Econ. 5(2):141–155. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00021-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen M, Vihervaara P, Kinnunen S, D’Amato D, Badura T, Argimon M, Ten Brink P. 2012. Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: TemaNord.
   Google Scholar
• Knekt P, Kumpulainen J, Järvinen R, Rissanen H, Heliövaara M, Reunanen A, Hakulinen T, Aromaa A. 2002. Flavonoid intake and risk of chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 76:560–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krafft M, Kullgren A, Stigson H, Ydenius A. 2011. Bilkollision med älg – utvärdering av verkliga olyckor och krockprov. Umeå Universitet. [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 21]; 21. Available from: http://media.folksam.se/sv/files/2011/10/Folksam-algrapport-2011.pdf (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Küller R, Küller M. 1994. Stadens grönska, äldres utevistelse och hälsa. Byggforskningsrådet, R24. ISBN 91-540-5656-X (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtze N, Eikemo T, Hem K-G. 2009. Analyse og dokumentasjon av friluftslivets effekt på folkehelse og livskvalitet. SINTEF Teknologi og samfunn rapport A11851, ISBN 9788214047929 (In Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Larsson A, editor. 2011. Tillståndet i skogen – rödlistade arter i ett nordiskt perspektiv. ArtDatabanken Rapporterar 9. ArtDatabanken SLU (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Ljung PE, Riley SJ, Heberlein TA, Ericsson G. 2012. Eat prey and love: game-meat consumption and attitudes toward hunting. Wildl Soc Bull. 36:669–675. doi: 10.1002/wsb.208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson L, Boman M, Eriksson G. 2008. Så mycket är jakten värd. Svensk Jakt (5) (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson L, Boman M, Ericsson G. 2008b. Jakten i Sverige – Ekonomiska värden och attityder jaktåret 2005/06. Adaptiv förvaltning av vilt och fisk Rapport nr: 1 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson L, Li C-Z. 1994. How do different forest management practices affect the non-timber value of forests? – an economic analysis. J Environ Manage. 41:79–88. doi: 10.1006/jema.1994.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson LA, Baron J, Melilo JM, Naiman RJ, O’Malley RI, Orians G, Palmer MA, Pfaff ASP, Running SW, Sala OE. 2005. Aggregate measures of ecosystem services: can we take the pulse of nature? Front Ecol Environ. 3(1):56–59. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0056:AMOESC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moffat AJ. 2003. Indicators of soil quality for UK forestry. Forestry. 76(5):547–568. doi: 10.1093/forestry/76.5.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mononen L, Auvinen A-P, Ahokumpu A-L, Rönkä M, Aarras N, Tolvanen H, Kamppinen M, Viirret E, Kumpula T, Vihervaara P. 2015. National ecosystem service indicators: measures of social–ecological sustainability. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.041.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Housing, Building and Planning. 2007. Bostadsnära natur – inspiration & vägledning. ISBN: 978-91-85751-35-8 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen AB, Olsen SB, Lundhede T. 2007. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landscape Urban Plan. 80:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norling I, Larsson E-L. 2004. Ett gott och friskare liv som äldre: för en aktiv livsstil i natur och trädgård, Göteborgs botaniska trädgård, 2004, ISBN 9187068397 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Norman J, Annerstedt M, Boman M, Mattsson L. 2010. Influence of outdoor recreation on self-rated human health: comparing three categories of Swedish recreationists. Scand J Forest Res. 25(3):234–244. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.485999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaussen JO, Skonhoft A. 2011. A cost-benefit analysis of moose harvesting in Scandinavia. A stage structured modelling approach. Resour Energ Econ. 33:589–611. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson J. 2007. The importance of nature in coping [Doctoral dissertation]. Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, SLU. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sweciae. 2007(15).
   Google Scholar
• Page-Dumroese D, Jurgensen M, Elliot W, Rice T, Nesser J, Collins T, Meurisse R. 2000. Soil quality standards and guidelines for forest sustainability in northwestern North America. Forest Ecol Manag. 138:445–462. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00430-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulmann L, Hannerz M. 2002. Mycket jobb men god utdelning, tycker Sveriges julgransodlare. PlantAktuellt. Nyhetsbrev om skogsplantor. 4:2–3. (In Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• Power JF, Myers RJK. 1989. The maintenance or improvement of farming systems in North America and Australia. In: Stewart JWB, editor. Soil quality in semi-arid agriculture. Proceedings of an International Conference sponsored by the Canadian International Development Agency; 1989 June 11–16. Saskatoon (Canada): Saskatchewan Canada, Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology.
   Google Scholar
• Powers RF, Scott DA, Sanchez FG, Voldseth RA, Page-Dumroese D, Elioff JD, Stone DM. 2005. The North American long-term soil productivity experiment: findings from the first decade of research. Forest Ecol Manag. 220:31–50. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC. 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No. 703. Washington (DC): Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Sami Parliament of Sweden. 2012. Sametingets genomförandestrategi för Landsbygdsprogrammet 2007–2013. Revidering godkänd av Jordbruksveket 2012-03-27 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Samnegård U, Persson AS, Smith HG. 2011. Gardens benefit bees and enhance pollination in intensively managed farmland. Biol Conserv. 144:2602–2606. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F, Skjelhaugen OJ, Asplund D, Nesheim L. 2011. An overview of the biomass resource potential of Norway for bioenergy use. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 15:3388–3398. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Schuck A. 2003. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biol. 9:1620–1633. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenholtz SH, van Miegroet H, Burger JA. 2000. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecol Manag. 138:335–356. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00423-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulp CJE, Thuiller W, Verburg PH. 2014. Wild food in Europe: a synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service. Ecol Econ. 105:292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjörs H. 1989. Blåbär, Vaccinium myrtillus – ett växtporträtt. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 83:412–428. (In Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2007:60. 2007. Sverige inför klimatförändringarna – hot och möjligheter.  [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 21]; 21. Available from: http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2007/10/sou-200760-/ (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2013:68. 2013. Synliggöra värdet av ekosystemtjänster – Åtgärder för välfärd genom biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster. ISBN 978-91-38-24017-5 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2001. Enrivonmental accounts for forest. [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 22]; 22. Available from: http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI1202/2000I02/MIFT0105.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sverdrup H, Rosén K. 1998. Long-term base cation mass balances for Swedish forests and the concept of sustainability. Forest Ecol Manag. 110(1):221–236. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00283-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. 2007. Nationellt program för att förbättra villkoren för produktion och saluföring av honung, 2008–2010. Dnr 22-2722/07, 2007-04-10 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. 2009. Massdöd av bin – samhällsekonomiska konsekvenser och möjliga åtgärder. Rapport 2009:24 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Arbetsrapport LULUCF. Underlag till Naturvårdsverkets redovisning om Färdplan 2050 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. 2005. Stormen Gudrun – Konsekvenser för nätbolag och samhälle. ER 16:2005 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2013. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2013. ISSN 0491-7847, 376 p.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2014. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2014. ISSN 0491-7847, 370 p.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. 2002. Mål för folkhälsan. Regeringens proposition 2002/03:35 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Tabbush P. 2010. Cultural values of trees, woods and forests. The Research Agency of the Forestry Commission. [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 21]; 21. Available from: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/Cultural_value_woods_full_report_March2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2009. TEEB climate issues update. September. [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 21]; 21. Available from: http://www.teebweb.org/
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra P. 2013. Tourism in Sweden. Facts & statistics 2012. Effects of tourism on the economy, exports and employment, and tourism volumes, behaviour and supply & demand. Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth. Stockholm, Info 0521.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn NA, Parrotta JA, Nasi R. 2011. Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. BioScience. 61(12):972–981. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuresson T. 2010. Bioenergi från skog. Uppdaterad bedömning av potentialer och förutsättningar för svenskt skogsbruk att producera främst primära skogsbränslen – vintern 2009/10. Zephyr Skogskonsult, 55 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Turkelboom F, Raquez P, Dufrene M, Raes L, Simoens I, Jacobs S, Stevens M, Vreese R, De Panis J, Hermy M, et al. 2013. CICES going local: ecosystem services classification adapted for a highly populated country. In: Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Keune H, editors. Ecosystem services: global issues, local practices. New York: Elsevier; p. 223–247.
   Google Scholar
• Turtiainen M, Nuutinen T. 2012. Evaluation of information on wild berry and mushroom markets in European countries. Small-scale For. 11:131–145. doi: 10.1007/s11842-011-9173-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtiainen M, Salo K, Saastamoinen O. 2011. Variations of yield and utilisation of bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and cowberries (V. vitis-idaea L.) in Finland. Silva Fennica. 45(2):237–251. doi: 10.14214/sf.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuvendal M. 2012. Ecosystem services – a tool in sustainable landscape management. Doctoral Thesis in Natural Resources Management at Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Sweden. ISBN: 978-91-7447-587-6.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen L, Mäntymaa E, Ovaskainen V. 2014. Demand for enhanced forest amenities in private lands: the case of the Ruka-Kuusamo tourism area, Finland. Forest Policy Econ. 47:4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: synthesis of the key findings [Internet]. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC; [cited 2016 March 21]. Available from: http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/
   Google Scholar
• Vitousek PM, Matson PA. 1984. Mechanisms of nitrogen retention in forest ecosystems: a field experiment. Science. 225:51–52. doi: 10.1126/science.225.4657.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan CJ, Wenny DG, Marquis RJ. 2008. Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1134:25–60. doi: 10.1196/annals.1439.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. 1965. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains. Guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. Agriculture Handbook No. 282. Washington (DC): Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Worrell R, Hampson A. 1997. The influence of some forest operations on the sustainable management of forest soils – a review. Forestry. 70(1):61–85. doi: 10.1093/forestry/70.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandersen M, Tol RSJ. 2009. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. J Forest Econ. 15:109–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar