Spatially explicit assessment of roundwood and logging residues availability and costs for the EU28

References

• Ackerman P, Belbo H, Eliasson L, de Jong A, Lazdins A, Lyons J. 2014. The COST model for calculation of forest operations costs, Int J For Eng. 25:75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. 2012. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working Paper no. 12-03. FAO: Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen A, Liiri H, Peltola S, Karjalainen T, Laitila J. 2008. Forest energy potential in Europe (EU 27). Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 69. 33 p.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrami H. 2001. On the relationship between ground temperature histories and meteorological records: a report on the Pomquet station. Glob Planet Change. 29:327–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley C, Dykstra D. 1987. Timber supply. In: Binkley CS, Dykstra DP, Kallio MJ, editors. The global forest sector: an analytical perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; p. 508–533.
   Google Scholar
• Borz SA, Ignea G, Popa B. 2014. Assessing timber skidding efficiency in a group shelterwood system applied to a fir-beech stand. Afr J Agric Res. 9:160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher H, Verkerk PJ, Gusti M, HavlÍk P, Grassi G. 2012. Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models. GCB Bioenergy. 4:773–783. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01152.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinker RW, Kinard J, Rummer B, Landford B. 2002. Machine rates for selected forest harvesting machines. Circular 296, September 2002. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T. 1995. Underlag för producktionsnorm för stora engreppskördare i slutavverkning. Basic data for productivity norms for heavy-duty single-grip harvesters in final felling. Redogörelse nr. 7, Skogforsk, The Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T. 2004. Underlag till produktionsnormer för skotare. (Productivity-norm data for forwarders). Redogörelse från Skogforsk nr 3, Skogforsk The Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T. 2007. Underlag för produktionsnormer för extra stora engreppskördare i slutavverkning. (Basic data for productivity norms for extra large single-grip harvesters in final felling). Redogörelse från Skogforsk nr 2, Skogforsk, The Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Brungberg T. 2014. Skogsbrukets kostnader 2014 [Internet]. Skogforsk: [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.skogforsk.se/kunskap/kunskapsbanken/2015/skogsbrukets-kostnader-2014
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T, Eliasson L. 2013. Productivity standards for forwarding of logging residues. In Efficient forest fuel supply systems. ESS R&D programme 2007-2010 Skogforsk. ISBN 978-91-977649-4-0 116 p.
   Google Scholar
• Buongiorno J, Zhu S, Zhang D, Turner J, Tomberlin D. 2003. The global forest products model. Chichester: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chien Y, Arias AM. 2015. Lagging long-term wage growth [Internet]. Economic Synopses, Issue 14, 2015. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract = 2646127
   Google Scholar
• Daioglou V, Stehfest E, Wicke B, Faaij A, Mantau U, Saal U, Prins K, Steierer F, Lindner M, Van Vuuren PD. 2015. Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry. GCB Bioenergy. ISSN: 1757-1693. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fulvio F, Bergström D. 2013. Analyses of a single-machine system for harvesting pulpwood and/or energy-wood in early thinnings. Int J For Eng. 24:2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dimou V, Malivisti Z. 2014. Strategic decision model for the evaluation of timber harvesting systems. Int J For Eng. 26:146–157.
   Google Scholar
• EFSOS. 2011. The European Forest Sector Outlook Study II. UNECE/FAO United Nations Publications Geneva September 2011, ISSN 1020-2269, 107 p.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Lindroos O. 2014. Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets. Int J For Eng. 25:179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Erni V, Lemm R, Frutig F, Breitenstein M, Riechsteiner D, Oswald K, Thees O. 2003. HeProMo – Produktivitätsmodelle für Holzerntearbeiten. Windows-Software, Version 1.01; Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. European Soil Database (v. 2.0), raster version 1 km × 1 km. European Commission – DG Joint Research Centre, Ispra. [Internet] [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/european-soil-database-v20-vector-and-attribute-data
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. EU energy, transport and GHG emissions trends to 2050, Reference scenario 2013. Directorate-General for Energy, Directorate-General for Climate Action and Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. ISBN 978-92-79-33728-4: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2833/17897
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. EU transport in figures. Statistical Pocketbook 2014. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2014. State of the World's Forests 2014. Rome. E-ISBN 978-92-5-108270-6.
   Google Scholar
• FE. 2011. FOREST EUROPE, UNECE and FAO 2011: State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 2011. ISBN 978-82-92980-05-7. Oslo Grøset Trykk AS. 337 pp.
   Google Scholar
• ForeStat. 2013. [Internet]. Production Quantity Roundwood 2013. [cited 2016 Aug 1] Available from: http://faostat.fao.org
   Google Scholar
• Frank S, Böttcher H, Gusti M, Havlík P, Klaassen G, Kindermann G, Obersteiner M. 2016. Dynamics of the land use, land use change, and forestry sink in the European Union: the impacts of energy and climate targets for 2030. Climatic Change. 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1729-7
   Google Scholar
• Galik CS, Abt R, Wu Y. 2009. Forest biomass supply in the Southeastern United States — implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. J For. 107:69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffariyan MR, Spinelli R, Brown M. 2013. A model to predict productivity of different chipping operations. South Forests. 75:129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffariyan MR, Stampfer K, Session J. 2009. Production equations for tower yarders in Austria. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 20:17–21.
   Google Scholar
• GIZ. 2013. Deutche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (Fuel Prices 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Granhus A, Fjeld D. 2008. Time consumption of planting after partial harvests. Silva Fenn. 42:49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusti M. 2010. An algorithm for simulation of forest management decisions in the global forest model. Artif Intell. 4:45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gusti M, Kindermann G. 2011. An approach to modeling landuse change and forest management on a global scale. In: SIMULTECH-2011. Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications--Kacprzyk J, Pina N, Filipe J, eds. (2011) Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands July 29–31 2011: SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications, Portugal. p. 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 342:850–853. doi:10.1126/science.1244693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsough BR, Zhang X, Fight RD. 2001. Harvesting cost model for small trees in natural stands in the interior Northwest. For Prod J. 51:54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík P, Schneider U, Schmid E, Böttcher H, Fritz S, Skalský R, Aoki K, Cara SD, Kindermann G, Kraxner F, et al. 2011. Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuels targets. Energy Policy. 39:5690–5702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock BK, Blomqvist L, Hall P, Jack M, Möller B, Wakelin SJ. 2012. Understanding forest-derived biomass supply with GIS modelling, J Spat Sci. 57:213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzleitner F, Stampfer K, Visser R. 2011. Utilization rates and cost factors in timber harvesting based on Long-term Machine Data. Cro J For Res. 32:501–508.
   Google Scholar
• International Country Risk Guide, ICRG, 5 year composite risk forecast [Internet]. Copyright, The PRS Group, Inc. 1984 Present, [cited 2016 Aug 1] Available from: https://www.prsgroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Johansson J, Liss JE. 2006. Utvärdering av nytt ekipage för vidaretransport av bränsleflis. Högskolan Dalarna, Institutionen för matematik, naturvetenskap och teknink. Arbetsdokument nr 3. Grapenberg, 25 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kindermann GE, McCallum I, Fritz S, Obersteiner M. 2008. A global forest growing stock, biomass and carbon map based on FAO statistics. Silva Fenn. 42:387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindermann GE, Schörghuber S, Linkosalo T, Sanchez A, Rammer W, Seidl R, Lexer MJ. 2013. Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios. Carbon Balance Manag. 8:2. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-8-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kluender R, Lortz D, Mc Coy W, Stokes B, Klepac J. 1997. Productivity of rubber-tired skidders in Southern pine forests. For Prod J. 47:53–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühmaier M, Stampfer K. 2010. Development of a multi-attribute spatial decision support system in selecting timber harvesting systems. Croat J For Eng. 31:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühmaier, M. 2013. OEKOCHIP, Multi-criteria analysis of energy-wood supply chains. Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Windows Software. June 2013. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Laitila J, Asikainen A, Nuutinen Y. 2007. Forwarding of whole trees after manual and mechanized felling bunching in pre-commercial thinnings. Int J For Eng. 18:29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lauri P, Havlik P, Kindermann G, Forsell N, Böttcher H, Obersteiner M. 2014. Woody biomass energy potential in 2050. Energy Policy. 66:19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J. 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For Ecol Manag. 188:211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligné D, Eliasson L & Nordfjell T. 2005. Time consumption and damage to the remaining stock in mechanised and motor manual pre-commercial thinning. Silva Fennica. 39:455–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz D, Kluender R, McCoy W, Stokes B, Klepac J. 1997. Manual felling time and productivity in southern pine forests. For Prod J. 47:59–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark R, Atthanassiadis D, Wetterlund E. 2015. Supply assessment of forest biomass – a bottom-up approach for Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy. 75:213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantau U, Saal U, Prins K, Steierer F, Lindner M, Verkerk H, Eggers J, Leek N, Oldenburger J, Asikainen A, Anttila P. 2010. EUwood – real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final report. Call for tenders No. TREN/D2/491-2008. EUwood. Hamburg/Germany, June 2010. 160 p.
   Google Scholar
• Miyata ES. 1980. Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. General Technical Report GTR-NC-55. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. St. Paul, MN. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad A, Seale J, Meade B, Regmi A. 2011. International evidence on food consumption patterns: an update using 2005 International Comparison Program Data. Technical Bulletin (1929) USDA-ERS. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Nordfjell T, Bacher M, Eriksson L, Kadlec J, Stampfer K, Suadicani K, Suwala M, Talbot B. 2004. Operational factors influencing the efficiency in conversion. In: Spiecker H, Hansen J, Klimo E, Skovsgaard JP, Sterba H, Von Teuffel K, editors. Norway spruce conversion-options and consequences. European Forest Institute Research Report 18: Leiden-Boston: Brill; p. 197–223.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi J. 2007. Recovery of logging residues for energy from spruce (Pices abies) dominated stands. Biomass Bioenergy. 31:375–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Heinonen J. 2007. Characteristics and time consumption of timber trucking in Finland. Silva Fenn. 41:471–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J. 2006. Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fenn. 40:335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen ED, Gibbons DJ. 1983. Predicting skidder productivity: a mobility model. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Research Bulletin 43, 19 p.
   Google Scholar
• Open street map. [Internet] [cited 2016 Aug 1] Available from: http://www.openstreetmap.org
   Google Scholar
• Platts. 2013. World electric power plants database, 2013 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.platts.com/products/world-electric-power-plants-database
   Google Scholar
• Repo A, Böttcher H, Kindermann G, Liski J. (2015). Sustainability of forest bioenergy in Europe: land-use-related carbon dioxide emissions of forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy. 7:877–887. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RISI, Pulp and Paper mill Asset Database. [Internet] [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.risiinfo.com/service/mill-data-costs/asset-database
   Google Scholar
• Routa J, Asikainen A, Björheden R, Laitila J, Röser D. 2013. Forest energy procurement: state of the art in Finland and Sweden. WIREs Energy Environ. 2:602–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkema R, Faaij APC, Ranta T, Heinimo J, Gerasimov YY, Karjalainen T, Nabuurs GJ. 2014. Mobilization of biomass for energy from boreal forests in Finland & Russia under present sustainable forest management certification and new sustainability requirements for solid biofuels. Biomass Bioenergy. 71:23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siry JP, Greene WD, Harris TG, Izlar RL, Hamsley A, Eason KE, Tye T, Baldwin SS, Hydahl C. 2006. Wood supply chain efficiency and fiber cost: what can we do better? For Prod J. 56:4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalsky R, Tarasovicova Z, Balkovic J, Schmid E, Fuchs M, Moltchanova E, Kindermann G, Scholtz P. 2008. Geo-bene global database for bio-physical modeling v. 1.0. Concepts, methodologies and data. Technical Report, IIASA, Laxenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Hartsough BR, Magagnott N. 2010. Productivity standards for harvesters and processors in Italy. For Prod J. 60:226–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Pari L, De Francesco F. 2015. A comparison of tractor-trailer units and high-speed forwarders used in Alpine forestry. Scand J For Res. 30:470–477. doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1012113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stampfer K. 2002. Optimierung von Holzerntesystemen im Gebirge. Habilitationsschrift eingereicht an der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, 96 p.
   Google Scholar
• Stampfer K, Limbeck-Lilienau B, Kanzian C, Viertler K. 2003. Baumverfahren im Seilgelände Verfahrensbeispiele. – Wien: Eigenverlag des FPP Kooperationsabkommens Forst-Platte-Papier, 27 p.
   Google Scholar
• Teobaldelli M, Somogyi Z, Migliavacca M, Usoltsev VA. 2009. Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. For Ecol Manag. 257:1004–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank Group. 2014. Economy Snapshots, paying-taxes. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2014a. PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $). [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1] Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator /
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2014b. Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market exchange rate. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1] Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator /
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2014c. Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%). [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator /
   Google Scholar
• Verkerk PJ, Anttila P, Eggers J, Lindner M, Asikainen A. 2011. The realizable potential supply of woody biomass from forests in the European Union. For Ecol Manag. 261:2007–2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkerk PJ, Levers C, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Valbuena R, Verburg PH, Zudin S. 2015. Mapping wood production in European forests. For Ecol Manag. 357:228–238. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser R, Berkett H. 2015. Effect of terrain steepness on machine slope when harvesting. Int J For Eng. 26:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Visser R, Stampfer K. 2015. Expanding ground-based harvesting onto steep terrain: a review. Croat J For Eng. 36:321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WDPA Consortium. 2004. World Database on Protected Areas. [Internet] Copyright World Conservation Union (IUCN) and UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.protectedplanet.net
   Google Scholar
• Wihersaari M. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy. 28:435–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit M, Faaij A. 2010. European biomass resource potential and costs. Biomass Bioenergy. 34:188–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfsmayr UJ, Rauch P. 2014. The primary forest fuel supply chain: a literature review. Biomass Bioenergy. 60:203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WorldClim- Global Climate Data Free climate data for ecological modeling and GIS. [Internet] Mean temperature map 30 arc-seconds. [cited 2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.worldclim.org/version1
   Google Scholar
• Yemshanov D, McKenney DW, Fraleigh S, McConkey B, Huffman T, Smith S. 2014. Cost estimates of post harvest forest biomass supply for Canada. Biomass Bioenergy. 69:80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar