Damage by pathogens and insects to Scots pine and lodgepole pine 25 years after reciprocal plantings in Canada and Sweden

References

• Aukema BH, Carroll AL, Zhu J, Raffa KF, Sickley TA, Taylor SW. 2006. Landscape level analysis of mountain pine beetle in British Columbia, Canada: spatiotemporal development and spatial synchrony within the present outbreak. Ecography. 29:427–441. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bella IE, Navratil S. 1988. Western gall rust dynamics and impact in young lodgepole pine stands in west-central Alberta. Can J For Res. 18:1437–1442. doi: 10.1139/x88-222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund N, Lindgren S. 2009. Diameter of lodgepole pine and mortality caused by the mountain pine beetle: factors that influence their relationship and applicability for susceptibility rating. Can J For Res. 39:908–916. doi: 10.1139/X09-020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blenis PV, Duncan I. 1997. Management implications of western gall rust in precommercially thinned lodgepole pine stands. Can J For Res. 27:603–608. doi: 10.1139/x97-034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blenis PV, Li W. 2005. Incidence of main stem infections of lodgepole pine by western gall rust decreases with increasing age. Can J For Res. 35:1314–1318. doi: 10.1139/x05-059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdon RD. 2010. Conservation and management of potentially resistant tree germplasm: a key but easily neglected part of a robust biosecurity strategy. New Zeal J For Sci. 40:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H. 2014. A spatiotemporal pattern analysis of historical mountain pine beetle outbreaks in British Columbia, Canada. Ecography. 37:344–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christersson L, Von Fircks H, Sihe Y. 1987. Damage to conifer seedlings by summer frost and winter drought. In: Sakai A, Larcher W, editors. Conf. proceedings, ‘Plant cold hardiness’. York: New Alan R. Liss. Inc; p. 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Cubbage F, Mac Donagh P, Balmelli G, Olmos VM, Bussoni A, Rubilar R, de la Torre R, Lord R, Huang J, Hoeflich VA, et al. 2014. Global timber investments and trends, 2005– 2011. In: Falshaw R, editor. Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Planted Forests ‘Planted forests on the globe - renewable resources for the future’. Bordeaux, France; Dublin, Ireland; and Porto and Estoril, Portugal, 16– 21 May 2013. New Zeal J For Sci. 44:suppl. 1, 12 pp.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel of Plant Health (PLH). 2014. Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Atropellis spp. EFSA J. 12:3926, 33 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3926
   Google Scholar
• Elfving B, Ericsson T, Rosvall O. 2001. The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden – a review. For Ecol Manage. 141:15–29. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00485-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfving B, Norgren O. 1993. Volume yield superiority of lodgepole pine compared to Scots pine in Sweden. In: Lindgren D, editor. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium; 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Report 11:69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrenberg S, Kane JM, Mitton JB. 2014. Resin duct characteristics associated with tree resistance to bark beetles across lodgepole and limber pines. Oecologia. 174:1283–1292. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2841-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrenberg S, Mitton JB. 2014. Smooth bark surfaces can defend trees against insect attack: resurrecting a “slippery” hypothesis. Functional Ecol. 28:837–845. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist. 167:353–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries A, Elfving B, Ukrainetz NK. 2016. Growth and survival of lodgepole pine and Scots pine after 25 years in a reciprocal transplant experiment in Canada and Sweden. Scand J For Res. Accepted 4 Aug 2016. doi.10.1080/02827581.2016.1221990.
   Google Scholar
• Fries A, Ericsson T, Gref R. 2000. High heritability of wood extractives in Pinus sylvestris progeny tests. Can J For Res. 30:1707–1713. doi: 10.1139/x00-100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries C. 1993. Development of planted Pinus sylvestris and P. contorta after soil preparation in a northern climate. Scand J For Res. 8:73–80. doi: 10.1080/02827589309382756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furniss RL, Carolin VM. 1977. Western forest insects. U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. No. 1339. 702 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R. 2002. ASReml users guide release 1.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson P, Karlman M. 1997. Survival, height and health status of 20-year-old Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta after different scarification treatments in a harsh boreal climate. Scand J For Res. 12:340–350. doi: 10.1080/02827589709355421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart JH. 1981. Role of phytostilbenes in decay and disease resistance. Ann Rev Phytopathol. 19:437–458. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.19.090181.002253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff RJ. 1991. Resistance to western gall rust in artificially inoculated ponderosa pine. Can J For Res. 21:1316–1320. doi: 10.1139/x91-185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Joint Swedish – Canadian. 1987. A Joint Swedish–Canadian Forest Industry–University Project. A species–genotype–environment–interaction study. The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, The Faculty of Forestry, Umeå, Sweden; 2 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Karlman M. 1981. The introduction of exotic tree species with special reference to Pinus contorta in northern Sweden. Stud For Suec. 158:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Karlman M. 2001. Risks associated with the introduction of Pinus contorta in northern Sweden with respect to pathogens. For Ecol Manage. 141:97–105. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00492-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlman M, Hansson P, Witzell J. 1994. Scleroderris canker on lodgepole pine introduced in northern Sweden. Can J For Res. 24:1948–1959. doi: 10.1139/x94-250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlman M, Van der Kamp B, Witzell J. 1997. Susceptibility of Pinus sylvestris to stem rusts of Pinus contorta in Western Canada. Scand J For Res. 12:168–178. doi: 10.1080/02827589709355398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayihan GC, Nelson CD, Huber DA, Amerson HV, White TL, Davis JM. 2010. Clonal evaluation for fusiform rust disease resistance: effects of pathogen virulence and disease escape. Can J For Res. 40:1042–1050. doi: 10.1139/X10-045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojwang HO. 1994. Variation and heritability of resistance of lodgepole pine to Western gall rust. For Path. 24:137–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1994.tb00979.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren D, Lindgren K. 1990. A Canadian-Swedish species-genotype environment interaction study. In: Douglas-fir, Contorta Pine, Sitka Spruce and Abies Breeding and Genetic Resources. Proceedings of a joint meeting with IUFRO WP S2.02-05, 06, 12 and 14. 1990. Aug 20–24; Western Forest Genetics Association, Olympia, Washington; 10 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren K, Nilsson JE. 1992. Cold acclimation of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta provenances as measured by freezing tolerance of detached needles. Scand J For Res. 7:309–315. doi: 10.1080/02827589209382723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, Maron JL, Morris WF, Parker IM, Power AG, et al. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett. 9:726–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00908.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell CE, Power AG. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature. 421:625–627. doi: 10.1038/nature01317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund BÅ. 1986. Simulation of damage and mortality in young stands and associated stand development effects. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Silviculture. Rapporter, No. 18. Swedish with summary in English. 147 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nevill RJ, Lam E, Merler H, Borden JH. 1990. Effects of atropellis canker and stalactiform blister rust on the bending strength and stiffness of lodgepole pine lumber. Wood Sci Technol. 24:225–232. doi: 10.1007/BF01153556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä P, Danell K. 1988. Comparison of moose browsing on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and lodgepole pine (P. contorta). J Appl Ecol. 25:761–775. doi: 10.2307/2403744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgren O. 1996. Growth analysis of Scots pine and lodgepole pine seedlings. For Ecol Manage. 86:15–26. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03800-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott DS, Yanchuk AD, Huber DPW, Wallin K. 2011. Genetic variation of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia, chemical and physical defenses that affect mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, attack and tree mortality. J Chem Ecol. 37:1002–1012. doi: 10.1007/s10886-011-0003-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce RB. 1996. Antimicrobial defences in the wood of living trees. New Phytologist. 132:203–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piirto DD, Valkonen S. 2005. Structure and development of pitch cancer infected Monterey pine stands at Año Nuevo, California. For Ecol Manage. 213:160–174. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle A, Bever JD, Gardes M, Parrent JL, Rillig MC, Klironomos JN. 2009. Mycorrhizal symbioses and plant invasions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:699–715. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebele F. 1994. Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett. 4:173–187. doi: 10.2307/2997649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson C, Nelson TA, Jelinski DE, Wulder MA, Boots B. 2009. Spatial–temporal analysis of species range expansion: the case of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae. J Biogeogr. 36:1446–1458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchini LA, Lewis KJ, Lindgren S, Bennett RG. 1999. Association of pitch moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae and Pyralidae) with rust diseases in a lodgepole pine provenance trial. Can J For Res. 29:1610–1614. doi: 10.1139/x99-136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner S, Hannrup B. 2004. Resin canal traits relevant for constitutive resistance of Norway spruce against bark beetles: environmental and genetic variability. For Ecol Manage. 200:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosvall O. 2010. Lecture at the NordGen and Skogsstyrelsen conference [Foreign tree species – possibilities or threat?] Främmande trädslag – möjligheter eller hot? Uppsala 6–7 October 2010. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Skogsstyrelsen. 2014. Skogsstatistisk årsbok. [Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry] Skogsstyrelsen: Jönköping, Sweden: 1–369. Swedish with English summary.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek W, Hopkins JC, Simmons CS. 1986. Effect of spacing in lodgepole pine stands on incidence of Atropellis canker. For Chron. 62:91–95. doi: 10.5558/tfc62091-2
   Google Scholar
• Tigerstedt PMA. 1993. Why do exotic trees often exceed the yield of endemic trees. In: Lindgren D, editor. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium; 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Report 11:60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Kamp BJ. 1989. The relative susceptibility of scots and lodgepole pine to western gall rust. Eur J For Path. 19:274–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1989.tb00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kamp BJ. 1994. Lodgepole pine stem diseases and management of stand density in the British Columbia interior. For Chron. 70:773–779. doi: 10.5558/tfc70773-6
   Google Scholar
• Van der Kamp BJ, Karlman M, Witzell J. 1995. Relative frequency of bole and branch infection of lodgepole pine by western gall rust. Can J For Res. 25:1962–1968. doi: 10.1139/x95-211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaegen D, Randrianjafy H, Andriatsitohaina HR, Rakotonirina M-CT, Andriamampianina N, Montagne P, Rasamindisa A, Chaix G, Bouillet J-P, Bouvet J-M. 2014. Eucalyptus robusta pour une production durable de bois énergie à Madagascar: bilan des connaissances et perspectives. Bois et Forêts de Tropiques 320, 15–30. French with English summary.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis CM, Reich RW, Lewis KJ, Huber DPW. 2010. Lodgepole pine provenances differ in chemical defense capacities against foliage and stem diseases. Can J For Res. 40:2333–2344. doi: 10.1139/X10-178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, D’Eon S, Dong J. 2006. Introduction of Canadian tree species to the Northeast of China. For Chron. 82:219–225. doi: 10.5558/tfc82219-2
   Google Scholar
• Woods AJ, Nussbaum A, Golding B. 2000. Predicted impacts of hard pine stem rusts on lodgepole pine dominated stands in central British Columbia. Can J For Res. 30:476–481. doi: 10.1139/x99-236
   Google Scholar
• Wu HX, Ying CC. 1997. Genetic parameters and selection efficiencies in resistance to western gall rust, stalactiform blister rust, needle cast, and sequoia pitch moth in lodgepole pine. For Sci. 43:571–581.
   Google Scholar
• Yanchuk AD, Murphy JC, Wallin KF. 2008. Evaluation of genetic variation of attack and resistance in lodgepole pine in the early stages of a mountain pine beetle outbreak. TGG. 4:171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagory D. 1979. Effect of western gall rust [Endocronartium harknessii (Moore, J.P.) Hiratsuka Y] on height growth of radiata pine. Phytopathology. 69:1049–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziller WG. 1974. The tree rusts of western Canada. Publ Can For Serv PAC For Res Cent Publ. 1329, 272 pp.
   Google Scholar