Effects of field plot configurations on the uncertainties of ALS-assisted forest resource estimates

References

• Barrett F, McRoberts RE, Tomppo E, Cienciala E, Waser LT. 2016. A questionnaire-based review of the operational use of remotely sensed data by national forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ. 174:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerikäinen K. 2009. A multivariate linear mixed-effects model for the generalization of sample tree heights and crown ratios in the Finnish National Forest Inventory. For Sci. 55:480–493.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire TG, Valentine HT. 2008. Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Applied environmental statistics. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Haralikck RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. SMC-3:610–621. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell FE. 2001. Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hollaus M, Wagner W, Maier B, Schadauer K. 2007. Airborne laser scanning of forest stem volume in a mountainous environment. Sensors. 7:1559–1577. doi: 10.3390/s7081559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasasenaho J. 1982. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Commun Inst Fenn. 108:1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Loetsch F, Haller KE. 1973. Forest inventory, Vol. I. München: BLV Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Korhonen KT, Packalén P, Mehtätalo L, Suvanto A. 2007. Testing the usability of truncated angle count sample plots as ground truth in airborne laser scanning-based forest inventories. Forestry. 80:73–81. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpl045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo M., Næsset E., Vauhkonen J, editors. 2014. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning – concepts and case studies. Managing forest ecosystems, Vol. 27. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Ørka OM, Bollandsås OM, Gobakken T, Næsset E. 2015. Using pre-classification to improve the acciracy of species-specific forest attribute estimates from airborne laser scanner data and aerial images. Scand J Res. 4:336–345.
   Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Packalén P, Kallio E, Kangas J, Uuttera J, Heikkilä J. 2011. Airborne laser scanning based stand level management inventory in Finland. In: SilviLaser 2011. Hobart, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Packalén P. 2014. Species-specific management inventory in Finland. In: Maltamo, M, Næsset, E, Vauhkonen, J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. Managing forest ecosystems, Vol. 27. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mandallaz D. 2008. Sampling techniques for forest inventories. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Næsset E, Gobakken T. 2013. Inference for Lidar-assisted estimation of forest growing stock volume. Remote Sens Environ. 128:268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Nordkvist K, Jonzén J, Axensten P, Olsson H, Wallerman J, Egbert M, Lindgren N, Larsson S, Nilsson L, Eriksson J. 2015. A nationwide forest attribute map of Sweden derived using airborne laser scanning data and field data from the national forest inventory. In: Proceedings of SilviLaser 2015, September 28–30, 2015. La Grande Motte, France, p. 211–213.
   Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 1997a. Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 52:49–56. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(97)83000-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naesset E. 1997b. Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens Environ. 61:246–253. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ. 80:88–99. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2004. Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand J Res. 19:164–179. doi: 10.1080/02827580310019257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2007. Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia. Scand J Res. 22:433–442. doi: 10.1080/02827580701672147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2014. Area-based inventory in Norway – from Innovation to an operational reality. In: Maltamo, M, Næsset, E, Vauhkonen, J, editors. Forestry application of airborne laser scanning. Managing forest ecosystems, Vol. 27. Heidelberg: Springer; p. 215–240.
   Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T, Bollandsås OM, Gregoire TG, Nelson R, Ståhl G. 2013. Comparison of precision of biomass estimates in regional field sample surveys and airborne LiDAR-assisted surveys in Hedmark County, Norway. Remote Sens Environ. 130:108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T, Holmgren J, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J, Maltamo M, Nilsson M, Olsson H, Persson Å, Söderman U. 2004. Laser scanning of forest resources: the Nordic experience. Scand J Res. 19:482–499. doi: 10.1080/02827580410019553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E, Gobakken T, Solberg S, Gregoire TG, Nelson R, Ståhl G, Weydahl D. 2011. Model-assisted regional forest biomass estimation using LiDAR and InSAR as auxiliary data: a case study from a boreal forest area. Remote Sens Environ. 115:3599–3614. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packalén P, Maltamo M. 2007. The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Remote Sens Environ. 109:328–341. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrinzi G, Clementel F, Floris A. 2015. Angle count sampling reliability as ground truth for area-based LiDAR applications in forest inventories. Can J Res. 45:506–514. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk JL, Reutebuch SE, Andersen H-E, Gould PJ, McGaughey RJ. 2012. Model-assisted forest yield estimation with light detection and ranging. West J Appl. 27:53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 58:267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Gschwantner Th, Lawrence M, McRoberts RE, editors. 2010. National forest inventories – pathways for common reporting. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Haakana M, Katila M, Peräsaari J. 2008. Multi-source national forest inventory – methods and applications. Managing forest ecosystems, Vol. 18. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Halme M. 2004. Using coarse scale forest variables as ancillary information and weighting of variables in k-NN estimation: a genetic algorithm approach. Remote Sens Environ. 92:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Heikkinen J, Henttonen HM, Ihalainen A, Katila M, Mäkelä H, Tuomainen T, Vainikainen N. 2011. Designing and conducting a forest inventory – case: 9th National Forest Inventory of Finland. Springer, Managing Forest Ecosystems, Vol. 22. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Katila M, Mäkisara K, Peräsaari J. 2014. The Multi-source National Forest Inventory of Finland – methods and results 2011. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 319. Available from: http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2014/mwp319.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Vauhkonen J, Maltamo M, McRoberts RE, Næsset E. 2014. Introduction to forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. In: Maltamo, M, Næsset, E, Vauhkonen, J, editors. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. Managing forest ecosystems, Vol. 27. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ware KD, Cunia T. 1962. Continuous forest inventory with partial replacement of samples. Forest Science Monograph, Vol. 3. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters; p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar