The impact of road geometry, surface roughness and truck weight on operating speed of logging trucks

References

• Adolini-Minnicino M, Elefteriadou L. 2004. Speed prediction models for trucks on two-lane rural highways. Paper presented at: 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlin K, Granlund J, Lindström F. 2004. Comparing road profiles with vehicle perceived roughness. Int J Veh Des. 36:270–286. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2004.005360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Sessions J. 1991. Factors affecting maximum gradeability of a log truck around a curve. Trans Res Record. 2:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson PT, Pyles MR, Sessions J. 1987. The operation of logging trucks on steep, low-volume roads. Fourth international conference on low volume roads. NY (USA): Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Anund A. 1992. Vägytans inverkan på fordonshastigheter [Road surface effects on vehicle speeds]. Linköping: VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. VTI Meddelande pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett CR, Greenwood ID. 2001. Modelling road user and environmental effects in HDM-4. The highway development and management series, ISOHDM technical secretariat, Birmingham (United Kingdom). Paris: World Roads Association (PIARC); 414 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm H, Bylander G, Larsson G, Viberg L. 1964. Heavy lumber transports on forest roads of various design. Civil and environmental engineering. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 27.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm H, Bylander G, Larsson G, Viberg L. 1965. Vägstandardens inverkan på tunga fordons hastighet [Road standards impact on heavy vehicle speed]. Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten, Stockholm: Teknik; 13: p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Brunberg T. 2016. Skogsbrukets kostnader och intäkter 2015 [Forestry costs and revenues 2015]. Kunskapsbanken. Uppsala: Skogforsk, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne JJ, Nelson RJ, Googins PH. 1960. Logging road handbook: the effect of road design on hauling costs. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Cenek P, Herrington P, Henderson R, Holland B, Walton IMD. 2011. High-stress corners. Wellington: NZ Transport Agency; p 58. NZ Transport agency report 466.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS. 2013. Regression analysis by example. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. p 424.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Jordan P, Young J. 1980. The effect on traffic speeds of resurfacing a road. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Donnell E T, Ni Y, Adolini M, Elefteriadou L. 2001. Speed prediction models for trucks on two-lane rural highways. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 1751:44–55. doi: 10.3141/1751-06
   Google Scholar
• Egghe L, Leydesdorff L. 2009. The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 60:1027–1036. doi: 10.1002/asi.21009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Redlands: Environmental System Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Z-W, Douglas RA. 1993. Logging truck vehicle performance prediction for efficient resource transportation system planning: computer modelling approach. J Forest Eng. 4:7–18. doi: 10.1080/08435243.1993.10702644
   Google Scholar
• Flisberg P, Lidén B, Rönnqvist M, Selander J. 2012. Route selection for best distances in road databases based on drivers’ and customers’ preferences. Can J For Res. 42:1126–1140. doi: 10.1139/x2012-063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogdestam N, Löfroth C. 2015. ETTdemo 2011–2013: Slutrapport, demonstration av ETT- och ST-fordon [ETT-demo, demonstration of ETT- and ST-vehicles]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Arbetsrapport 50 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg M, Löfroth C, Thor M. 2002. Improved efficiency in forest haulage using integrated information technology (TRANSMIT). Stockholm: VINNOVA, Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems; p. 70.
   Google Scholar
• Garber NJ, Gadirau R. 1988. Speed variance and its influence on accidents. Washington (DC): AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; p. 69.
   Google Scholar
• Grigolato S, Pellegrini M, Cavalli R. 2013. Temporal analysis of the traffic loads on forest road networks. iForest-Biogeosci Forestry. 6:255–261. doi: 10.3832/ifor0773-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S-K. 2011. Managing woody biomass transportation for improved biomass economics [Ph.D. thesis.]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University, p. 191.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood DW, Torbic DJ, Richard KR, Glauz WD. 2003. Review of truck characteristics as factors in roadway design. Washington (DC): Transportation Research Board; 194 pp. NCHRP Report 0309087791.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan Y, Sarhan M. 2011. Modeling operating speed: synthesis report. Washington (DC): Transportation Research Board; 136 pp. Transportation Research E-Circular 0097-8515 E-C151.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrand T. 2011. Dispenstransporter - en handbok [Transport exemptions – a manual]. Borlänge: Swedish Road Administration; 057:p. 134.
   Google Scholar
• Holzleitner F, Kanzian C, Höller N. 2013. Monitoring the chipping and transportation of wood fuels with a fleet management system. Silva Fennica. 47:1–11. doi: 10.14214/sf.899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihs A, Velin H. 2002. Vägytans inverkan på fordonshastigheter: data från 1992–1999 [Road surface effects on vehicle speeds: data from 1992–1999]. Linköping: VTI, The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute; p. 32. VTI notat 40–2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RK. 1986. Log truck performance on curves and favorable grades [Masteŕs thesis]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University. Forest department 82 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RK, Sessions J, Board TR. 1987. Logging truck speeds on curves and favorable grades of single-lane roads. Transp Res Rec. 1106:112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Jalinier C, Nader J. 1993. OTTO: Truck performance simulation program, Pointe Claire, Québec: Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada=Institut canadien de recherches en génie forestier.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe I. 2002. Principal component analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; p. 488.
   Google Scholar
• Langvall O, Löfroth C. 1988. TRANSAM - för transportkalkyler och känslighetsanalyser [TRANSAM - for transport calculations and sensitivity analyzes]. Stockholm: Forskningsstiftelsen skogsarbeten, The Forest Operations Institute of Sweden; p. 4. Nytt 4.
   Google Scholar
• Leisch J, Leisch J. 1977. New concepts in design-speed application. Transp Res Rec. 631:4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Löfroth C. 2014. Skogsbilvägar [Forest roads]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden; p. 101. Handledning.
   Google Scholar
• Löfroth C, Svenson G. 2012. ETT-Modulsystem för skogstransporter - En Trave Till (ETT) och Större Travar (ST) [ETT-Modular system for timber transports - One More Stack (ETT) and Bigger Stacks (ST)]. Uppsala: Skogforsk, The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Arbetsrapport 157 pp.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack R. 1990a. TRUCKSIM-a log truck performance simulator. J Forest Eng. 2:31–37. doi: 10.1080/08435243.1990.10702621
   Google Scholar
• McCormack RJ. 1990b. Measuring and evaluating log truck performance in a variety of operating conditions. Blacksburg: Departement of Forestry, Virginia Tech; p. 138.
   Google Scholar
• Moll JE, Copstead RL. 1996. Travel time models for forest roads – a verification of the Forest Service Logging Road Handbook. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service; p. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Morris CM, Donnell ET. 2014. Passenger car and truck operating speed models on multilane highways with combinations of horizontal curves and steep grades. J Transp Eng. 140:1–10. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevečerel H, Pentek T, Pičman D, Stankić I. 2007. Traffic load of forest roads as a criterion for their categorization–GIS analysis. Croatian J Forest Eng. 28: 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Heinonen J. 2007. Characteristics and time consumption of timber trucking in Finland. Silva Fenn. 41:471–487. doi: 10.14214/sf.284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou F-L, Hessel AJ, Collett LW, Nordengren DR. 1983. Effect of road design on timber-hauling speed in the United States. Paper presented at: Third International Conference on Low-Volume Roads. Tempe, AZ, Transportation Research Board: 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Peiyu L, ÓReilly R. 1987. Predicting speed and fuel consumption of the log trucks in New Zealand. Paper presented at: New Zealand Roading Symposium, National Roads Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers MW, Karamihas SM. 1998. The little book of profiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. p. 102.
   Google Scholar
• Schiess P, Shen Z. 1990. UWTRUCK Useŕs Guide. Seattle, WA: Forest Engineering Department, University of Washington; p. 32. AR-10.
   Google Scholar
• Simwanda M. 2010. Modeling biomass transport on single lane forest roads and monitoring GPS accuracy for vehicle tracking under different forest canopy conditions. Corvallis (OR): Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University; 153 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Simwanda M, Sessions J, Boston K, Wing MG. 2015. Modeling biomass transport on single-lane forest roads. For Sci. 61:763–773.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2016. Skogsråvara index T08SÅ17 [Index forest raw material]. Index för lastbilstransporter. http://akeri.se/. The Swedish Association of Road Transport Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg U, Silversides C. 1988. Operational efficiency in forestry: Volume 1: analysis. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 219 p.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 2008. NVDB Contents – overview. Swedish Road Administration, Borlänge (Sweden). NVDB Contents 14 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson G, Fjeld D. 2016. The impact of road geometry and surface roughness on fuel consumption of logging trucks. Scand J For Res. 31:526–536. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1092574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenson G, Flisberg P, Rönnqvist M. 2016. Using analytics in the implementation of vertical and horizontal curvature in route calculation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 17:1772–1785. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2503424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torset T. 2011. The speed prediction model for heavy vehicles. European Transport Conference. Glasgow: Association for European Transport. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Zaniewski J P, Moser B, De Morais PJ, Kaeschagen RL. 1979a. Fuel consumption related to vehicle type and road conditions. Paper presented at: Low Volume Roads: Second International Conference. Washington: TRB, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Zaniewski JP, Moser BK, Swait JD Jr. 1979b. Predicting travel time and fuel consumption for vehicles on low-volume roads. Low-volume roads: second international conference; August 20–23. Washington (DC): Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar