Price integration for domestic and imported sawlogs and pulpwood in Finland: an update

References

• Abadir KM, Hadri K, Tzavalis E. 1999. The influence of VAR dimensions on estimator biases. Econometrica. 67: 163–181. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SK, Reinsel GC. 1990. Estimation of partially nonstationary multivariate autoregressive models. JASA. 85: 813–823. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkoyunlu S, Siliverstovs B. 2014. Does the law of one price hold in a high-inflation environment? A tale of two cities in Turkey. Appl Econ. 46: 3236–3245. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.925190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann R, Krolzig H-M, Lütkepohl H. 2002. Comparision of model reduction methods for VAR processes. Discussion Papers, SFB, HU Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey D, Fuller W. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time-series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc. 74: 427–431. doi: 10.2307/2286348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen R, Toppinen A, & Toivonen R. 2006. Transmission of price changes in sawnwood and sawlog markets of the old and new EU member countries. Eur J Forest Res. 126:111–120. doi: 10.1007/s10342-006-0135-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetemäki L, Kuuluvainen J, Toppinen A. 2016. Future of forest-based sector – state of the art and research needs. In: S Baardsen, T Eid, HF Hoen, editors. Festschrift in Honor of professors Ole Hofstad and Birger Solberg. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. INA Fagrapport. 36. Ås, Norway: Norwegian University of Life Sciences; p. 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Jaunky VC, Lundmark R. 2015. Dynamics of timber market integration in Sweden. Forests. 6. 4617–4633. doi: 10.3390/f6124391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen S. 1988. Statistical analysis of co-integrating vectors. J Econ Dyn Control. 12: 231–254. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen S. 1995. Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen S, Mosconi R, Nielsen B. 2000. Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. Economet J. 3: 216–249. doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00047
   Google Scholar
• Kallio AMI. 2001. Interdependence of the sawlog, pulpwood and sawmill chip markets: an oligopsony model with an application to Finland. Silva Fenn. 35: 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econometrics. 54: 159–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanne M, Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P. 2002. Comparison of unit root tests for time series with level shifts. J Time Ser Anal. 23: 667–685. doi: 10.1111/1467-9892.00285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luppold W, Prestemon J. 2003. Tests for long-run relationships in hardwood lumber prices. Forest Sci. 49: 918–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl H. 1993. Testing for causation between two variables in higher dimensional VAR models. In: H Schneeweiß, KF Zimmermann, editors. Studies in Applied Econometrics. Contributions to Economics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; p. 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl H. 2005. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl H, Krätzig M, editors. 2004. Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markkinaoikeuden päätös MAO:614/09. 2009. Markkinaoikeus 3.12.2009 Dnro 407/06/KR [Market court decision]. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Morales Olmos V, Siry J. 2015. Global pulpwood markets and the law of one price. MathComput Forest Nat Resour Sci. 7: 16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mutanen A, Kalliovirta L, Leppänen J, Viitanen J. 2015. Ekonometrisia mallinnuksia raakapuun tuonnista ja suomen raakapuumarkkinoista. Raakapuun tuonnin ja kotimaan raakapuumarkkinoiden välistä yhteyttä koskeva taustaselvitys. [Econometric modelling of wood imports and domestic wood markets. Background research report on the relationship between wood imports and domestic markets]. Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute Finland. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Mutanen A, Toppinen A. 2007. Price dynamics in the Russian-Finnish roundwood trade. Scand J Forest Res. 22: 71–80. doi: 10.1080/02827580601138207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki-Hakola M. 2002. Cointegration of the roundwood markets around the Baltic Sea. An empirical analysis of roundwood markets in Finland, Estonia, Germany and Lithuania. Pellervo Economic Research Institute Working Papers, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Nagubadi V, Munn IA, Tahai, A. 2001. Integration of Hardwood stumpage Markets in the South-central United States. J Forest Econ. 7: 61–98.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan PK. 2005. The savings and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ. 37: 1979–1990. doi: 10.1080/00036840500278103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Resource Institute Finland (Luke). 2017. Volumes and prices in roundwood trade. Finland. [cited 2016 Nov 20]. Available from http://stat.luke.fi/en/tilasto/4448/kuvaus/4594.
   Google Scholar
• Park H, Fuller W. 1995. Alternative estimators and unit root tests for the autoregressive process. J Time Ser Anal. 16: 415–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.1995.tb00243.x
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith RJ. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom. 16: 289–326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran P, Pesaran MH. 2007. Time series econometrics using microfit 5.0. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piesse J, Hearn BA. 2012. The law of one price: an examination of price integration between Europe and regional markets in Africa. Appl Econ. 44: 3169–3193. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2011.570722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen P. 1992. Estimation and testing of cointegrated systems by an autoregressive approximation. Economet Theor. 8: 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0266466600010720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen P, Lütkepohl H. 2000. Testing for the cointegrating rank of a VAR process with structural shifts. J Bus Econ Statist. 18: 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen P, Lütkepohl H. 2002. Testing for a unit root in a time series with a level shift at unknown time. Economet Theor. 18: 313–348. doi: 10.1017/S0266466602182053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størdal S, Nyrud AQ. 2003. Testing roundwood market efficiency using multivariate cointegrating estimator. For Pol Econ. 5: 57–68. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen BJ. 1998. Spatial integration in the Nordic timber market: Long-run equilibria and short-run dynamics. Scand J Forest Res. 13: 488–498. doi: 10.1080/02827589809383010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilli T, Toivonen R, Toppinen A. 2001. Modelling birch pulpwood imports to Finland. Scand J Forest Res. 16: 173–179. doi: 10.1080/028275801300088260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Viitanen J, Leskinen P, Toivonen R. 2005. Dynamics of roundwood prices in Estonia, Finland and Lithuania. Balt For. 11: 88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R, Baek J. 2005. Is there a single national lumber market in the United States? Forest Sci. 51: 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhao Q, Kuuluvainen J, Wang C, Li S. 2015. Determinants of China’s lumber import: a bounds test for cointegration with monthly data. J Forest Econ. 21: 269–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar