Litter impair spruce seedling emergence in beech forests: a litter manipulation experiment

References

• Ahola V, Leinonen K. 1999. Responses of Betula pendula, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris seeds to red/far-red ratios as affected by moist chilling and germination temperature. Can J For Res. 29:1709–1717. doi: 10.1139/x99-128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammer C, Mosandl R, Kateb HE. 2002. Direct seeding of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) stands – effects of canopy density and fine root biomass on seed germination. For Ecol Manag. 159:59–72. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00710-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augusto L, De Schrijver A, Vesterdal L, Smolander A, Prescott C, Ranger J. 2015. Influences of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species on the functioning of temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev. 90:444–466. doi: 10.1111/brv.12119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier R, Ettl R, Hahn C, Göttlein A. 2006. Early development and nutrition of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings on different seedbeds in the Bavarian limestone Alps – a bioassay. Ann For Sci. 63:339–348. doi: 10.1051/forest:2006014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brang P. 1998. Early seedling establishment of Picea abies in small forest gaps in the Swiss Alps. Can J For Res. 28:626–639. doi: 10.1139/x98-035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner I, Rigling D, Egli S, Blaser P. 1999. Response of Norway spruce seedlings in relation to chemical properties of forest soils. For Ecol Manag. 116:71–81. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00445-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH. 1994. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can J For Res. 24:337–349. doi: 10.1139/x94-046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaci J. 2002. Regeneration dynamics in a Norway spruce plantation on a silver fir-beech forest site in the Slovenian Alps. For Ecol Manag. 161:27–38. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00492-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzwonko Z, Gawroński S. 2002. Influence of litter and weather on seedling recruitment in a mixed oak–pine woodland. Ann Bot. 90:245–251. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingsen VM, Asplund J, Ohlson M. 2017. Spatial and temporal patterns in seed predation as revealed by reciprocal experiments and video surveillance in neighbouring beech and spruce forests. Scand J For Res. 32:105–114. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1215523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facelli JM, Pickett STA. 1991. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot Rev. 57:1–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02858763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facelli JM, Williams R, Fricker S, Ladd B. 1999. Establishment and growth of seedlings of Eucalyptus obliqua: interactive effects of litter, water, and pathogens. Aust J Ecol. 24:484–494. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-169x.1999.00988.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner M, Thompson K. 2005. The ecology of seeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman-Grajales SM, Walker LR. 1991. Differential seedling responses to litter after hurricane Hugo in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto Rico. Biotropica. 23:407–413. doi: 10.2307/2388259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen-Thorn A, Callesen I, Armolaitis K, Nihlgård B. 2004. The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. For Ecol Manag. 195:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon ME, Franklin JF. 1989. Tree seedlings on logs in Picea-Tsuga forests of Oregon and Washington. Ecology. 70:48–59. doi: 10.2307/1938411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen J. 2005. Effect of nitrate and ammonium on growth of transplanted Norway spruce seedlings: a greenhouse study. Ann Bot Fenn. 42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickler T, Vohland K, Feehan J, Miller PA, Smith B, Costa L, Giesecke T, Fronzek S, Carter TR, Cramer W, et al. 2012. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 21:50–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovstad KA, Ohlson M. 2007. Physical and chemical effects of litter on plant establishment in semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol. 196:251–260. doi: 10.1007/s11258-007-9349-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunziker U, Brang P. 2005. Microsite patterns of conifer seedling establishment and growth in a mixed stand in the Southern Alps. For Ecol Manag. 210:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp AK, Smith WK. 1982. Factors influencing understory seedling establishment of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) in southeast Wyoming. Can J Bot. 60:2753–2761. doi: 10.1139/b82-337
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Kalmari R. 2003. Regeneration microsites of Picea abies seedlings in a windthrow area of a boreal old-growth forest in southern Finland. Ann Bot Fenn. 40:401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Barrera F, González-Espinosa M. 2001. Influence of litter on emergence and early growth of Quercus rugosa: a laboratory study. New For. 21:59–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1010623403834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molofsky J, Augspurger CK. 1992. The effect of leaf litter on early seedling establishment in a tropical forest. Ecology. 73:68–77. doi: 10.2307/1938721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta R, Berretti R, Lingua E, Piussi P. 2006. Coarse woody debris, forest structure and regeneration in the Valbona Forest Reserve, Paneveggio, Italian Alps. For Ecol Manag. 235:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordborg F, Nilsson U, Örlander G. 2003. Effects of different soil treatments on growth and net nitrogen uptake of newly planted Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings. For Ecol Manag. 180:571–582. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00650-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlson M, Ellingsen VM, del Olmo MV, Lie MH, Nybakken L, Asplund J. 2017. Late-Holocene fire history as revealed by size, age and composition of the soil charcoal pool in neighbouring beech and spruce forest landscapes in SE Norway. The Holocene. 27:397–403. doi: 10.1177/0959683616660174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostra S, Majdi H, Olsson M. 2006. Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21:364–371. doi: 10.1080/02827580600950172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Schütze G. 2005. Crown allometry and growing space efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed stands. Plant Biol. 7:628–639. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robakowski P, Wyka T, Samardakiewicz S, Kierzkowski D. 2004. Growth, photosynthesis, and needle structure of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) seedlings under different canopies. For Ecol Manag. 201:211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer EJ. 2006. Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter in the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol Rev. 81:1–31. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppi P, Conedera M, Sedivy I, Thimonier A. 2007. Correcting non-linearity and slope effects in the estimation of the leaf area index of forests from hemispherical photographs. Agric For Meteorol. 144:236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon A, Gratzer G, Sieghardt M. 2011. The influence of windthrow microsites on tree regeneration and establishment in an old growth mountain forest. For Ecol Manag. 262:1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancioiu PT, O’Hara KL. 2006. Regeneration growth in different light environments of mixed species, multiaged, mountainous forests of Romania. Eur J Forest Res. 125:151–162. doi: 10.1007/s10342-005-0069-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thimonier A, Sedivy I, Schleppi P. 2010. Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods. Eur J Forest Res. 129:543–562. doi: 10.1007/s10342-009-0353-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Yanes C, Orozco-Segovia A. 1992. Effects of litter from a tropical rainforest on tree seed germination and establishment under controlled conditions. Tree Physiol. 11:391–400. doi: 10.1093/treephys/11.4.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Yanes C, Orozco-Segovia A, Rincón E, Sánchez-Coronado ME, Huante P, Toledo JR, Barradas VL. 1990. Light beneath the litter in a tropical forest: effect on seed germination. Ecology. 71:1952–1958. doi: 10.2307/1937603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters MB, Reich PB. 2000. Seed size, nitrogen supply, and growth rate affect tree seedling survival in deep shade. Ecology. 81:1887–1901. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1887:SSNSAG]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore TC. 1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology. 70:536–538. doi: 10.2307/1940195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong S, Nilsson C. 1999. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J Ecol. 87:984–994. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar