Litterfall in relation to stand parameters and climatic factors in Pinus brutia forests in Turkey

References

• Aertsen W, Kint V, Van Orshoven J, Özkan K, Muys B. 2010. Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests. Ecol Model. 221:1119–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ågren GI, Hyvönen R. 2003. Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model. For Ecol Manage. 174:25–37. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektson A. 1988. Needle litterfall in stands of Pinus sylvestris L. in Sweden, in relation to site quality, stand age and latitude. Scand J For Res. 3:333–342. doi: 10.1080/02827588809382521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund J, Hustoft E, Nybakken L, Ohlson M, Lie MH. 2017. Litter impair spruce seedling emergence in beech forests: a litter manipulation experiment. Scand J Forest Res. 42:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1388440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baig MN, Tranquillini W. 1980. The effects of wind and temperature on cuticular transpiration of Picea abies and Pinus cembra and their significance in dessication damage at the alpine treeline. Eocologia. 47:252–256.
   Google Scholar
• Becker J, Pabst H, Mnyonga J, Kuzyakov Y. 2015. Annual litterfall dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt. Kilimanjaro. Biogeosciences. 12:5635–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg B, Albrektson A, Berg MP, Cortina J, Johansson MB, Gallardo A, Madeira M, Pausas J, Kratz W, Vallejo R, McClaugherty C. 1999. Amounts of litterfall in some pine forests in a European transect, in particular Scots pine. Ann For Sci. 56:625–639. doi: 10.1051/forest:19990801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg B, Meentemeyer V. 2001. Litter fall in some European coniferous forests as dependent on climate: a synthesis. Can J For Res. 31:292–301. doi: 10.1139/x00-172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili E. 1995. A state-dependent model of forest floor development. Turk J Agr For. 22:323–328.
   Google Scholar
• Brando PM, Nepstad DC, Davidson EA, Trumbore SE, Ray D, Camargo P. 2008. Drought effects on litterfall, wood production and belowground carbon cycling in an Amazon forest: results of a through fall reduction experiment. Phil Trans Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0031 [accessed in January 2017].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepel N, Dundar M, Ozdemir T, Neyisci T. 1988. Kizilcam (Pinus brutia Ten.) ekosistemlerinde igne yaprak dokumu ve bu yolla topraga geri verilen besin maddeleri miktarlari [Needle litterfall and nutrient flow to the forest floor by this way in Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) forests]. Orm Arast Ens Yayinlari. Teknik Bulten Serisi No: 194: 20 s. Ankara. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J, Holland EA. 2001. Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecol App. 11:371–384. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0371:NPPITF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke N, Økland T, Hanssen KH, Nordbakken JF, Wasak K. 2017. Short-term effects of hardened wood ash and nitrogen fertilisation in a Norway spruce forest on soil solution chemistry and humus chemistry studied with different extraction methods. Scand J For Res. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1337921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JLJr, Dickmann DI, Flore JA. 1983. Photosynthesis and transpiration by young Larix kaempferi trees: C3 responses to light and temperature. Physiol Plant, 59:635–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb06292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S, Taskinsu-meydan S, Yilmaz E. 2006. Quantifying carbon budgets of conifer Mediterranean forest ecosystems, Turkey. Env Mon Asses. 119:527–543. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-9041-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agr Sust Dev. 29(1):185–212. doi: 10.1051/agro:2008021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GDF] General Directorate of Forestry (Turkey). 2012. Forest areas in Turkey, General Directorate of Forestry, Forest Management and Planning Department. Publication No: 85. Ankara, 27 p.
   Google Scholar
• [GDF] General Directorate of Forestry (Turkey). 2013. Report for forestry statistics in Turkey, unpublished documents, General Directorate of Forestry, Exploitation and Marketing Department. Ankara, 6 p.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories . In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index [accessed in January 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Irmak A, Cepel N. 1968. Belgrad Ormani’nda secilen birer kayin, mese, karacam mesceresinde yillik yaprak dokumunun miktari ve bu yolla topraga verilen besin maddelerinin tespiti uzerine arastirmalar [Needle litterfall and nutrients flow by this way to the forest floor in beech, oak and black pine forests in Belgrad Forests]. IU Orman Fak Der. Seri A Cilt: XVIII. Sayi: 2. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Kellomäki S, Wang KY. 2000. Modelling and measuring transpiration from Scots pine with increased temperature and carbon dioxide enrichment. Ann Bot 85:263–278. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1999.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler L, Hölscher D, Leuschner C. 2008. High litterfall in old-growth and secondary upper montane forest of Costa Rica. Plant Ecol. 199:163–173. doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9421-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liski J, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R. 2005. Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecol Mod. 189:168–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay SL, Arain MA, Khomik M, Brodeur JJ, Schumacher J, Hartmann H, Peichl M. 2012. The impact of induced drought on transpiration and growth in a temperate pine plantation forest. Hydrol Process. 26(12):1779–1791. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggini R, Lehmann A, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A. 2006. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. J Biogeogr. 33:1729–1749. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matala J, Kellomaki S, Nuutinen T. 2008. Litterfall in relation to volume growth of trees: analysis based on literature. Scand J Forest Res. 23(3):194–202. doi: 10.1080/02827580802036176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjöfors K, Strömgren M, Nohrstedt H-Ö, Johansson M-B, Gärdenäs AI. 2017. Indications that site preparation increases forest ecosystems carbon stocks in the long-term. Scand J Forest Res. 32(8):717–725. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1293152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muukkonen P. 2005. Needle biomass turnover rates of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) derived from the needle-shed dynamics. Trees. 19:273–279. doi: 10.1007/s00468-004-0381-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan K, Berger U. 2014. Predicting the potential distribution of plant diversity in the yukarıgökdere forest district of the Mediterranean region. Pol J Ecol. 62:441–454. doi: 10.3161/104.062.0306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pausas JG. 1997. Litterfall and litter decomposition in Pinus sylvestris forests of the eastern Pyrenees. J Veg Sci. 8:643–650. doi: 10.2307/3237368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J. 1999. A comparison of litterfall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, Sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark. For Ecol Manage. 114:55–70. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00381-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranger J, Gerard F, Lindemann M, Gelhaye D, Gelhaye L. 2003. Dynamics of litterfall in a chronosequence of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) stands in the Beaujolais mounts (France). Ann Forest Sci. 60:475–488. doi: 10.1051/forest:2003041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrod PH. 2003. DTREG manuel. http://www.dtreg.com/DTREG.pdf, http://www.dtreg.com/DTREG.pdf. Retrieved from the World Wide Web.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS v.22.0®. 2015. SPSS 22.0 Guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall; p. 637.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava LM. 2002. Plant growth and development-hormones and environment. London, UK: Academic Press; p. 772.
   Google Scholar
• Starr M, Saarsalmi A, Hokkanen T, Merilä P, Helmisaari H-S. 2005. Models of litterfall production for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Finland using stand, site and climate factors. For Ecol Manage. 205:215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun O, Eren E, Orpak M. 1977. Temel agac turlerimizde tek agac ve birim alandaki odun cesidi oranlarinin saptanmasi [Determination of the production types for individual and stand level of basic tree species]. TUBITAK Tarim ve Ormancilik Arastirma Grubu, Ankara. 120 p. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Sun O, Ugurlu S, Ozer E. 1980. Kizilcam (Pinus brutia Ten.) Turune ait biyolojik kutlenin saptanmasi [Determination of biomass for Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)]. Ormancilik Arast Ens Yay. Teknik Bulten Serisi No: 104, Ankara. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Taskinsu-Meydan S, Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S, Donmez C. 2010. Modeling above-ground litterfall in eastern Mediterranean conifer forests using fractional tree cover, and remotely sensed and ground data. Appl Veg Sci. 13:485–497. 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [TSMS] State Meteorological Service (Turkey). 2015. Meteorological data. http://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=ANTALYA [accessed in January 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Ukonmaanaho L, Merilä P, Nöjd P, Nieminen TM. 2008. Litterfall production and nutrient return to the forest floor in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Boreal Env Res. 13(Suppl):B67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Yuan W, Dong W, Liu S. 2014. Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecol. Complex. 20:240–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Guan L, Wei X, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Yan J, Wen D, Liu J, Liu S, Huang Z, et al. 2007. Litterfall production along successional and altitudinal gradients of subtropical monsoon evergreen broadleaved forests in Guangdong, China. Plant Ecol. 188:77–89. doi: 10.1007/s11258-006-9149-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar