Integrating bilberry yields into regional long-term forest scenario analyses

References

• Äijälä O, Koistinen A, Sved J, Vanhatalo K, Väisänen P, editors. 2014. Metsänhoidon suositukset [Forest management recommendations]. Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapion julkaisuja. http://tapio.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Metsanhoidon_suositukset_ver3_netti_1709141.pdf. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Andersson J, Dynesius M, Hjältén J. 2017. Short-term response to stump harvesting by the ground flora in boreal clearcuts. Scand J Forest Res. 32(3):239–245. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1269943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlegrim O, Sjöberg K. 1996. Effects of clear-cutting and single tree selection harvests on herbivorous insect larvae feeding on bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in uneven-aged boreal Picea abies forests. For Ecol Manage. 87:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03830-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederlund G, Ljungqvist H, Markgren G, Stålfelt F. 1980. Foods of moose and roe-deer at Grimsö in central Sweden. Results of rumen content analysis. Swed Wildlife Res. 11:169–247.
   Google Scholar
• de-Miguel S, Bonet JA, Pukkala T, Martínez de Aragón J. 2014. Impact of forest management intensity on landscape-level mushroom productivity: a regional model-based scenario analysis. For Ecol Manage. 330:218–227. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C. 2009. Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. For Sci. 55:512–523.
   Google Scholar
• Hedwall P-O, Brunet J, Nordin A, Bergh J, Halvorsen R. 2013. Changes in the abundance of keystone forest floor species in response to changes of forest structure. J Veg Sci. 24:296–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel A, Steyaert SMJG, Zedrosser A, Mysterud A, Lodberg-Holm HK, Gelink HW, Kindberg J, Swenson JE. 2016. Bears and berries: species-specific foraging on a patchily distributed food resource in a human-altered landscape. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 70:831–842. doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2106-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Ojansuu R, Hökkä H, Salminen H, Siipilehto J, Haapala P. 2002. Models for predicting stand development in MELA System. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 835.
   Google Scholar
• Juutinen A, Kosenius A-K, Ovaskainen V, Tolvanen A, Tyrväinen L. 2017. Heterogeneous preferences for recreation-oriented management in commercial forests: the role of citizens’ socioeconomic characteristics and recreational profiles. J Environ Plann Man. 60:399–418. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1159546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas K. 2001. Wild berry utilisation and markets in Finland. D.Sc. (Agr. and For.) thesis. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Research Notes 126.
   Google Scholar
• Koistinen A, Luiro J-P, Vanhatalo K, editors. 2016. Metsänhoidon suositukset energiapuun korjuuseen, työopas. Tapion julkaisuja. http://tapio.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/MHSEnergiapuun-korjuun-suositukset_verkkojulkaisu2.pdf. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen KT, Ihalainen A, Ahola A, Heikkinen J, Henttonen, HM, Hotanen J-P, Nevalainen S, Pitkänen J, Strandström M, Viiri H. 2017. Suomen metsät 2009–2013 ja niiden kehitys 1921–2013. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus (Natural Resources and Bioeconomy Studies) 59/2017. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-326-467-0. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Küçüker DM, Başkent EZ. 2017. Sustaining the joint production of timber and Lactarius mushroom: A case study of a forest management planning unit in Northwestern Turkey. Sustainability. 9(1):92. doi:10.3390/su9010092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurttila M, Tahvanainen V, editors. 2016. Description of new decision support tools for optimization of MPT and NWFP management. Deliverable 2.4. FP7 Project no 311919 KBBE.2012.1.2-06, European Commission. https://star-tree.eu/images/deliverables/WP2/D%202.4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lakka J, Kouki J. 2009. Patterns of field layer invertebrates in successional stages of managed boreal forest: implications for the declining Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus L. population. Forest Ecol Manag. 257:600–607. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappi J. 1992. JLP: A linear programming package for management planning. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 414.
   Google Scholar
• Marsi 2016. Luonnonmarjojen ja –sienten kauppaantulomäärät vuonna 2015. Maaseutuviraston julkaisusarja: Raportteja ja selvityksiä (web publication). http://www.mavi.fi/fi/tuet-ja-palvelut/viljelija/Documents/Marsi-2015-raportti.pdf (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Miina J, Hotanen J-P, Salo K. 2009. Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finnish mineral soil forests. Silva Fenn. 43:577–593. doi: 10.14214/sf.181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miina J, Pukkala T, Kurttila M. 2016. Optimal multi-product management of stands producing timber and wild berries. Eur J Forest Res. 135:781–794. doi: 10.1007/s10342-016-0972-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Forest Strategy 2025. 2015. Government Resolution of 12 February 2015. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 6b/2015, 56 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland. 2017a. Forest resources by region (web publication). [accessed 2017 Sep 15]. http://stat.luke.fi/en/forest-resources-region_en
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland. 2017b. Volumes and prices in industrial roundwood trade (web publication). [accessed 2017 Sep 15]. http://stat.luke.fi/en/volumes-and-prices-roundwood-trade
   Google Scholar
• Økland T, Nordbakken J-F, Lange H, Røsberg I, Clarke N. 2016. Short-term effects of whole-tree harvesting on understory plant species diversity and cover in two Norway spruce sites in southern Norway. Scand J Forest Res. 31(8):766–776. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1164889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Calama R, Cañellas I, Sánchez-González M. 2016. Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered. Eur J Forest Res. 135:607–619. doi: 10.1007/s10342-016-0958-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peura M, Triviño M, Mazziotta A, Podkopaev D, Juutinen A, Mönkkönen M. 2016. Managing boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues. Silva Fenn. 50(5): article id 1672. doi: 10.14214/sf.1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Kellomaki S, Mustonen E. 1988. Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scand J Forest Res. 3:533–544. doi: 10.1080/02827588809382538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O, Salo K, Hotanen J-P. 2011. A multifunctional comparison of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in a boreal region. Can J Forest Res. 41:851–862. doi: 10.1139/x11-009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raatikainen M, Rossi E, Huovinen J, Koskela M-L, Niemelä M, Raatikainen T. 1984. The yields of the edible wild berries in central Finland. Silva Fenn. 18:199–219. (In Finnish with English summary) doi: 10.14214/sf.a15393
   Google Scholar
• Redsven V, Hirvelä H, Härkönen K, Salminen O, Siitonen M. 2013. MELA2012 reference manual. 2nd ed.The Finnish Forest Research Institute. http://mela2.metla.fi/mela/julkaisut/oppaat/mela2012_2nd_ed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ristioja A. 2015. Luonnontuoteala. Ministry of Employment and the Economy, Toimialaraportit 1/2015. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79847/Luonnontuoteala_1_2015.pdf. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Salemaa M. 2000. Vaccinium myrtillus. Mustikka. [Bilberry]. In: Reinikainen A, Mäkipää R, Vanha-Majamaa I, Hotanen J.-P, editors. Kasvit muuttuvassa metsäluonnossa [Changes in the frequency and abundance of forest and mire plants in Finland since 1950]. Tammi, Helsinki; p. 128–130. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Siitonen M, Härkönen K, Hirvelä H, Jämsä J, Kilpeläinen H, Salminen O, Teuri M. 1996. MELA Handbook – 1996 Edition. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 622.
   Google Scholar
• Silvennoinen H, Alho J, Kolehmainen O, Pukkala T. 2001. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level. Landscape Urban Plan. 56:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00163-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver EJ, Leahy JE, Weiskittel AR, Noblet CL, Kittredge DB. 2015. An evidence-based review of timber harvesting behavior among private woodland owners. J Forest. 113:490–499. doi: 10.5849/jof.14-089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šišák L. 2006. Importance of non-wood forest product collection and use for inhabitants in the Czech Republic. J For Sci. 52:417–426. doi: 10.17221/4522-JFS
   Google Scholar
• Storch I. 1993. Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: Is bilberry important? Oecologia. 95:257–265. doi: 10.1007/BF00323498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtiainen M, Salo K, Saastamoinen O. 2005. Model-based estimates of regional and national bilberry and lingonberry yields on mineral soils in Finland. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. Research Notes 167. http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_952-458-764-5/urn_isbn_952-458-764-5.pdf. (In Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Turtiainen M, Salo K, Saastamoinen O. 2007. National and regional estimates of blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and lingonberry (V. vitis-idaea L.) yields on peatlands in Finland. Suo. 58:87–98. http://www.suoseura.fi/Alkuperainen/suo/pdf/Suo58_Turtiainen.pdf. (In Finnish with English summary)
   Google Scholar