References
- Akyüz K, Yildirim C, Balaban I, Gedik Y, Korkut S. 2010. Examination of forest products trade between Turkey and European union countries with gravity model approach. Afr J Biotechnol. 9:2375–2380. doi:10.5897/AJB2010.000-3046.
- Anderson JE. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev. 69:106–116. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1802501.
- Anderson JE. 2010. The gravity model. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper no. 16576.
- Anderson JE, van Wincoop E. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev. 93:170–192. doi:10.1257/000282803321455214.
- Buongiorno J. 2015. Monetary union and forest products trade – the case of the euro. J For Econ. 21:238–249. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2015.09.005.
- Buongiorno J. 2016. Gravity model of forest products trade: application to forecasting and policy analysis. Forestry. 89:117–126. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpw005.
- Colombo SJ, Ogden A. 2015. Canadian forest products: contributing to climate change solutions. Ottawa: Canadian Climate Forum. Issue paper #4.
- Dai M, Shen W. 2010. Trade flow and potentiality of China’s timber forest products: a gravity model. Resour Sci. 32:2115–2122.
- European Commission. 2016. Distance calculator. [accessed 2017 Feb 20]. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/tools/distance_en.htm.
- FAO. 2013. 2012 global forest products facts and figures. Rome: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
- FAO. 2017. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. [accessed 2017 Jan 21]. http://www.fao.org/forestry/energy/en/.
- Feenstra RC, Markusen JR, Rose AK. 2001. Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can J Econ. 34:430–447. doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00082.
- Frankel JA, Wei SJ. 1993. Trade blocs and currency blocs. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working paper series 4335.
- IMF. 2017. International Monetary Fund. [accessed 2017 Feb10]. http://data.imf.org/.
- Jonsson R, Egnell G, Baudin A. 2011. Swedish forest sector outlook. Umeå: Future Forests. Future Forests Working Report.
- Kangas K, Niskanen A. 2003. Trade in forest products between European Union and the central and eastern European access candidates. For Policy Econ. 5:297–304. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00063-1.
- McCallum J. 1995. National borders matters: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev. 85:615–623. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118191.
- Phillips PC, Perron P. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75:335–346. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2336182. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
- Rose AK. 2000. One money, one market: estimating the effect of common currencies on trade. Econ Policy. 15:7–45. doi:10.1111/1468-0327.00056.
- Silva JM, Tenreyro S. 2006. The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat. 88:641–658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
- Stay K, Kulkarni KG. 2016. The gravity model of international trade, a case study: the United Kingdom and her trading partners. Amity Global Busin Rev. 11:28–39.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor of Statistics. 2016. Bureau of Labor Statistics. [Access 2017 Feb 22]. https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet.