Service logics and strategies of Swedish forestry in the structural shifts of forest ownership: challenging the “old” and shaping the “new”

References

• Ager B. 2014. Skogsarbetets humanisering och rationalisering från 1900 och framåt. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar FX, Cai Z, Butler B. 2017. Proximal association of land management preferences: evidence from family forest owners. PLoS ONE. 12(1):1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Keskitalo ECH. 2018. Adaptation to climate change? Why business-as-usual remains the logical choice in Swedish forestry. Glob Environ Change. 48(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Lidestav G. 2016. Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women's networks. Forest Policy Econ. 67(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelstrand M. 2007. Miljömålet i skogsbruket: styrning och frivillighet. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Appelstrand M. 2012. Developments in Swedish forest policy and administration – from a “policy of restriction” toward a “policy of cooperation”. Scand J Forest Res. 27(2):186–199. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.635069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnould EJ. 2013. Rudiments of a value praxeology. Market Theory. 14(1):129–133. doi: 10.1177/1470593113500384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudrillard J. 1981. For a critique of the political economy of the sign. St. Louis (MO): Telos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard J. 1998. The consumer society: myths and structures. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Beland Lindahl K, Sténs A, Sandström C, Johansson J, Lidskog R, Ranius T, Roberge J-M. 2017. The Swedish forestry model: more of everything? Forest Policy Econ. 77(4):44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghäll S. 2018. Service marketing phenomena in the context of private forest owners—a service dominant logic perspective on scholarly literature. Curr Forestry Rep. 4(3):125–137. doi: 10.1007/s40725-018-0081-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C, Lidestav G, Holm S. 2006. Values placed on forest property benefits by Swedish NIPF owners: differences between members in forest owner associations and non-members. Small-Scale Forest Econ Manage Policy. 5(1):83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 1999. The sisneyization of society. Sociol Rev. 47(1):25–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler SM, Butler BJ, Markowski-Lindsay M. 2017. Family forest owner characteristics shaped by life cycle, cohort, and period effects. Small-Scale Forestry. 16(1):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11842-016-9333-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen DH, Kozak RA. 2002. Research and technology: market-driven innovation in the twenty-first century. Forestry Chron. 78(1):108–111. doi: 10.5558/tfc78108-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond J. 1998. Marketing and moral indifference. In: Parker M, editor. Ethics & organizations. London: SAGE; p. 173–196.
   Google Scholar
• DeSouza G. 1992. Designing a customer retention plan. J Bus Strategy. 13(2):24–28. doi: 10.1108/eb039477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erlandsson E. 2013. The impact of industrial context on procurement, management and development of Harvesting services: a comparison of two Swedish forest owners associations. Forests. 4(4):1171–1198. doi: 10.3390/f4041171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E, Fjeld D, Lidestav G. 2017. Measuring quality perception and satisfaction for wood harvesting services with a triad perspective. Int J Forest Eng. 28(1):18–33. doi: 10.1080/14942119.2017.1257304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C. 2009. Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. Forest Sci. 55(6):512–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficko A, Lidestav G, Ní Dhubháin Á, Karppinen H, Zivojinovic I, Westin K. 2019. European private forest owner typologies: a review of methods and use. Forest Policy Econ. 99(2):21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine B. 2013. Consumption matters. Ephemera. 13(2):217–248.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett J, McDonagh P. 2001. Relationship marketing, e-commerce and the emancipation of the consumer. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett JA, McDonagh P. 2000. A citizen's critique of relationship marketing in risk society. J Strategic Market. 8(2):209–222. doi: 10.1080/096525400346268
   Google Scholar
• Flint DJ. 2006. Innovation, symbolic interaction and customer valuing: thoughts stemming from a service-dominant logic of marketing. Market Theory. 6(3):349–362. doi: 10.1177/1470593106066796
   Google Scholar
• Follo G. 2011. Factors influencing Norwegian small-scale private forest owners’ ability to meet the political goals. Scand J Forest Res. 26(4):385–393. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.566574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follo G, Forbord M, Almås R, Blekesaune A, Rye JF. 2006. Den nye skogeieren. Hvordan øke hogsten i Trøndelag. Rapport 1/06. Trondheim: Norsk senter for bygdeforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Follo G, Lidestav G, Ludvig A, Vilkriste L, Hujala T, Karppinen H, Didolot F, Mizaraite D. 2017. Gender in European forest ownership and management: reflections on women as “new forest owners”. Scand J Forest Res. 32(2):174–184. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1195866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos C, Voima P. 2013. Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. J Acad Market Sci. 41(2):133–150. doi: 10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen E, Dibrell C, Down J. 2006. Market orientation, strategy, and performance in the primary forest industry. Forest Sci. 52(3):209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen E, Seppala J, Juslin H. 2002. Marketing strategies of softwood sawmills in western North America. Forest Prod J. 52(10):19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2014. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen K, Karlsson S, Westin K. 2016. New forest owners: change and continuity in the characteristics of Swedish non-industrial private forest owners (NIPF owners) 1990–2010. Small-Scale Forestry. 15(4):533–550. doi: 10.1007/s11842-016-9338-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2015. Forest owners’ socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of customer value: evidence from Finland. Small-Scale Forestry. 14(1):19–37. doi: 10.1007/s11842-014-9271-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietanen J, Andéhn M, Bradshaw A. 2017. Against the implicit politics of service-dominant logic. Market Theory. 18(1):101–119. doi: 10.1177/1470593117692023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G. 2005. What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small-Scale Forest Econ Manage Policy. 4(3):325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Hudgson D. 2001. ‘Empowering customers through education’ or governing without government? Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Kurttila M, Karppinen H. 2013. Customer segments among family forest owners: combining ownership objectives and decision-making styles. Small-Scale Forestry. 12(3):335–351. doi: 10.1007/s11842-012-9215-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingemarson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L. 2006. A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 21(3):249–259. doi: 10.1080/02827580600662256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isacson M, Morell M. 2002. Industrialismens tid: ekonomisk-historiska perspektiv på svensk industriell omvandling under 200 år. Stockholm: SNS förl.
   Google Scholar
• Jobber D, Lancaster G. 2012. Selling and sales management. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn. 32(1):43–59. doi: 10.14214/sf.699
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo ECH. 2017. Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use: natural resource management in transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo ECH, Liljenfeldt J. 2014. Implementation of forest certification in Sweden: an issue of organisation and communication. Scand J Forest Res. 29(5):473–484. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.919355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights D, Sturdy A. 1997. Marketing the Soul: from the ideology of consumption to consumer subjectivity. In: Knights D, Tinker T, editors. Financial institutions and social transformations: international studies of a sector. Basingstoke: Macmillan; p. 158–188.
   Google Scholar
• Knights D, Sturdy A, Morgan G. 1994. The consumer rules? Eur J Mark. 28(3):42–54. doi: 10.1108/03090569410057281
   Google Scholar
• Korczynski M. 2005. The point of selling: capitalism, consumption and contradictions. Organization. 12(1):69–88. doi: 10.1177/1350508405048577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler P. 1996. Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Leidner R. 1993. Fast food, fast talk: service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt T. 1981. Marketing intangible products and product intangibles. Cornell Hotel Restaur Administration Q. 22(2):37–44. doi: 10.1177/001088048102200209
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Arvidsson A-M. 2012. Member, owner, customer, supplier? The question of perspective on membership and ownership in a private forest owner cooperative. In: Global perspectives on sustainable forest management. Rijeka: INTECH Open Access Publisher; p. 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Nordfjell T. 2005. A conceptual model for understanding social practices in family forestry. Small-Scale Forestry. 4(4):391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Sjödin D. 2014. Why do forest owners fail to heed warnings? Conflicting risk evaluations made by the Swedish forest agency and forest owners. Scand J Forest Res. 29(3):275–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidskog R, Sjödin D. 2015. Risk governance through professional expertise. Forestry consultants’ handling of uncertainties after a storm disaster. J Risk Res. 19(10):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindroos O, Lidestav G, Nordfjell T. 2005. Swedish non-industrial private forest owners: a survey of self-employment and equipment investments. Small-Scale Forest Econ Manage Policy. 4(4):409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, Payne J. 2003. The political economy of skill and the limits of educational policy. J Edu Policy. 18(1):85–107. doi: 10.1080/0268093032000042227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodin I, Brukas V, Wallin I. 2017. Spruce or not? Contextual and attitudinal drivers behind the choice of tree species in southern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ. 83(10):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt L. 2014. Swedish forest owners’ associations: establishment and development after the 1970s. Small-Scale Forestry. 13(2):219–235. doi: 10.1007/s11842-013-9250-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse H. 1966. One dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston (MA): Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx K. 1976. Capital: a critique of political economy. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Matthies BD, D'Amato D, Berghäll S, Ekholm T, Hoen HF, Holopainen J, Korhonen JE, Lähtinen K, Mattila O, Toppinen A, et al. 2016. An ecosystem service-dominant logic? Integrating the ecosystem service approach and the service-dominant logic. J Cleaner Prod. 124:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila O, Roos A. 2014. Service logics of providers in the forestry services sector: evidence from Finland and Sweden. Forest Policy Econ. 43(6):10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila O, Toppinen A, Tervo M, Berghäll S. 2013. Non-industrial private forestry service markets in a flux: results from a qualitative analysis on Finland. Small-Scale Forestry. 12(4):559–578. doi: 10.1007/s11842-012-9231-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan G. 1992. Marketing discourse and practice: towards a critical analysis. In: Alvesson M, Willmott H, editors. Critical management studies. London: Sage; p. 136–158.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Sturdy A. 2000. Beyond organizational change: structure, discourse, and power in UK financial services. New York (NY): St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund A, Westin K. 2011. Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests. 2(1):30–50. doi: 10.3390/f2010030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Kallenberg R. 2003. Managing the transition from products to services. Int J Serv Ind Manage. 14(2):160–172. doi: 10.1108/09564230310474138
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley L, Tynan C. 1999. The utility of the relationship metaphor in consumer markets: a critical evaluation. J Market Manage. 15(7):587–602. doi: 10.1362/026725799785037067
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley L, Tynan C. 2000. Relationship marketing in consumer markets – rhetoric or reality? Eur J Mark. 34(7):797–815. doi: 10.1108/03090560010331225
   Google Scholar
• Pelli P, Haapala A, Pykäläinen J. 2017. Services in the forest-based bioeconomy – analysis of European strategies. Scand J Forest Res. 32(7):559–567. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1288826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñaloza L, Venkatesh A. 2006. Further evolving the new dominant logic of marketing: from services to the social construction of markets. Market Theory. 6(3):299–316. doi: 10.1177/1470593106066789
   Google Scholar
• Pülzl H, Kleinschmit D, Arts B. 2014. Bioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses? Scand J Forest Res. 29(4):386–393. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.920044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räty T, Toppinen A, Roos A, Riala M, Nyrud Anders Q. 2016. Environmental policy in the nordic wood product industry: insights into firms’ strategies and communication. Bus Strategy Environ. 25(1):10–27. doi: 10.1002/bse.1853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer G. 2010. Enchanting a disenchanted world: continuity and change in the cathedrals of consumption. Los Angeles (CA): Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer M, Stillman T. 2001. From person- to system-oriented service. In: Sturdy A, Grugulis I, Willmott H, editors. Customer service: empowerment and entrapment. Basingstoke: Palgrave; p. 102–116.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon O, Brunson M, Kuhns M. 2006. Benefit-based audience segmentation: a tool for identifying nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owner education needs. J Forestry. 104(8):419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster CP, Danes JE. 1986. Asking questions: some characteristics of successful sales encounters. J Pers Sell Sales Manage. 6(1):17–27.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2014. Skogsstatistisk årsbok [Statistical yearbook of forestry]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• SFIF. 2017. Swedish Forest Industries Federation: Ekonomi [Economy]; [accessed 2017-01-08]. http://www.skogsindustrierna.org/branschen_1/fakta/ekonomi
   Google Scholar
• Smith WR. 1956. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Mark. 21(1):3–8. doi: 10.1177/002224295602100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley KG, Marsden TK, Milbourne P. 2005. Governance, rurality, and nature: exploring emerging discourses of state forestry in Britain. Environ Plann C Government Policy. 23(5):679–695. doi: 10.1068/c43m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy A, Grugulis I, Willmott H. 2001. Customer service: empowerment and entrapment. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sturdy A, Knights D. 1996. The subjectivity of segmentation and the segmentation of subjectivity. In: Palmer G, Clegg S, editors. Constituting management: markets, meaning, and identities. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co; p. 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sturdy A, Korczynski M. 2005. In the name of the customer: service work and participation. In: Harley B, Hyman JD, Thompson P, editors. Participation and democracy at work: essays in honour of Harvie Ramsay. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 94–112.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen R, Hansen E. 2003. Quality dimensions of wood products — perceptions of German organisational customers. In: Helles F, Strange N, Wichmann L, editors. Recent accomplishments in applied forest economics research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen R, Järvinen E, Lindroos K, Rämö A-K, Ripatti P. 2005. The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: the Estonia and Finland cases. Small-Scale Forest Econ Manage Policy. 4(4):451–469.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Lähtinen K, Leskinen LA, Österman N. 2011. Network co-operation as a source of competitiveness in medium-sized finnish sawmills. Silva Fenn. 45(4):743–759. doi: 10.14214/sf.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Wan M, Lähtinen K. 2014. Strategic orientations in the global forest sector. In: Hansen E, Panwar R, Vlosky RP, editors. The global forest sector: changes, practices, and prospects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 405–428.
   Google Scholar
• Törnqvist T. 1995. Skogsrikets arvingar: en sociologisk studie av skogsägarskapet inom privat, enskilt skogsbruk [Inheritors of the woodlands: a sociological study of private, non-industrial forest ownership]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Turban E. 2000. Electronic commerce: a managerial perspective. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Warhurst C, Thompson P. 1998. Hands, hearts and minds: changing work and workers at the end of the century. In: Thompson P, Warhurst C, editors. Workplaces of the future. London: Macmillan; p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss G, Lawrence A, Hujala T, Lidestav G, Nichiforel L, Nybakk E, Quiroga S, Sarvašová Z, Suarez C, Živojinović I. 2019. Forest ownership changes in Europe: state of knowledge and conceptual foundations. Forest Policy Econ. 99(2):9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin K, Eriksson L, Lidestav G, Karppinen H, Haugen K, Nordlund A. 2017. Individual forest owners in context. In: Keskitalo ECH, editor. Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use: natural resource management in transition. London: Palgrave Macmillan; p. 57–95.
   Google Scholar