Survival of carabids after windthrow of pine forest depends on the presence of broken tree crowns

References

• Barkley EP, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI. 2016. Does variable stand structure associated with multi-cohort forests support diversity of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities in the central Nearctic boreal forest? J For Res. 27(5):1191–1202. DOI:10.1007/s11676-016-0252-z.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry S, Duchesne LC, Côté B. 1997. Short-term effects of three forestry practices on carabid assemblages in a jack pine forest. Can J Forest Res. 24:2065–2071. doi: 10.1139/x97-171
   Google Scholar
• Bouget C. 2005. Short-term effect of windthrow disturbance on ground beetle communities: gap and gap size effects. European Carabidology 2003. DIAS Report. 114:25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Duelli P. 2004. The effect of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 118:281–299. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burakowski B, Mroczkowski M, Stefańska J. 1973. Chrząszcze – Coleoptera. Biegaczowate – Carabidae, część I. Katalog Fauny Polsk, cz. XXIII, t. 2, nr 20. [Catalogue of beetles – Coleoptera. Ground beetles – Carabidae Part I. Catalogue of Fauna of Poland part XXIII, Vol. 2, No 20]. Warszawa: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Burakowski B, Mroczkowski M, Stefańska J. 1974. Chrząszcze – Coleoptera. Biegaczowate – Carabidae, część II. Katalog Fauny Polski, cz. XXIII, t. 3, nr 22. [Catalogue of beetles – Coleoptera. Ground beetles – Carabidae part II. Catalogue of Fauna of Poland part XXIII, Vol. 3, No 22]. Warszawa: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• du Bus de Warnaffe G, Lebrun P. 2004. Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv. 118:219–234. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duelli P, Obrist M, Wermelinger B. 2002. Windthrow-induced changes in faunistic biodiversity in alpine spruce forests. For Snow Landsc Res. 77:117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dufrene M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 67(3):345–366. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi KJK, Gilmore DW, Katovich SA, Matson WJ, Zasada JC, Seybold S. 2008. Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-borel forest. Forest Ecol Manag. 256:1104–1123. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi KJK, Spence JR, Langor DW, Morgantini LE. 2001. Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles(coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae). Biol Conserv. 102:131–141. DOI:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00099-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gongalsky KB, Midtgaard F, Overgaard HJ. 2006. Effects of prescribed forest burning on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): a case study in south-eastern Norway. Entomol Fennica. 17:325–333. doi: 10.33338/ef.84352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemain M, Loreau M, Daufrense T. 1997. Relationship between the regional distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and the abundance of their potential prey. Acta Oecol. 18(4):465–483. DOI:10.1016/S1146-609X(97)80035-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski J, Kubisz D, Sućko K, Zub K. 2010. The succession of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on windthrow areas in the Scots pine stands of the Piska forest. For Res Pap. 71:279–298. DOI:10.2478/v10111-010-0024-z.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer O, Harperm DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologial Electronica. 4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey JW, Hawes C, Peace AJ, Ferris-Kaan R, Jukes MR. 1999. Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag. 113:11–21. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00413-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hůrka K. 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Zlín: Kabourek.
   Google Scholar
• Jukes MR, Peace AJ, Ferris R. 2001. Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure. For Ecol Manag. 148(1–3):271–286. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00530-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kašák J, Foit J, Hučín M. 2017. Succession of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities after windthrow disturbance in a montane Norway spruce forest in the Hrubý Jeseník Mts. (Czech Republic). Cent Eur For J. 63:180–187. DOI:10.1515/forj-2017-0016.
   Google Scholar
• Koivula M. 2001. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Cara-bidae) inboreal managed forests – meso-scale ecological patterns in relation to modern forestry [PhD thesis]. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Koivula M. 2011. Useful model organisms, indicators, or both? Ground beetles (Coloptera, Carabidae) reflecting environmental conditions. Zookeys. 100:287–317. DOI:10.3897/zookeys.100.1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivula M, Punttila P, Haila Y, Niemalä J. 1999. Leaf litter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography. 22(4):424–435. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00579.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivula M, Venn S, Hakola P, Niemelä J. 2019. Responses of boreal ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) to different logging regimes ten years post harvest. Forest Ecol Manag. 436:27–38. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer MG, Sollins P, Sletten RS. 2004. Soil carbon dynamics across a windthrow disturbance sequence in southeast Alaska. Ecology. 85:2230–2244. doi: 10.1890/02-4098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs C. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. Menlo Park (CA): Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lövei G, Sunderland KD. 1996. The ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann Rev Entomol. 41:241–256. DOI:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.00131 doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura T. 2017. Ignoring functional and phylogenetic features masks the edge influence on ground beetle diversity across forest-grassland gradient. Forest Ecol Manag. 384:371–377. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura T, Bogyó D, Mizser S, Nagy DD, Tóthmérész B. 2015. Recovery of ground-dwelling assemblages during reforestation with native oak depends on the mobility and feeding habits of the species. For Ecol Manag. 339:117–126. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura T, Ködöböcz V, Tóthmérész B. 2001. Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabids in forest patches. J Biogeogr. 28(1):129–138. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00534.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura T, Lövei GL, Tóthmérész B. 2017. Edge responses are different in edges under natural versus anthropogenic influence: a meta-analysis using ground beetles. Ecol Evol. 7(3):1009–1017. DOI:10.1002/ece3.2722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Elek Z. 2005. Impacts of leaf-litter addition on carabids in a Conifer plantation. Biodivers Conserv. 14:475–491. DOI:10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiník A, Dobrovolný L, Hurt H. 2014. Comparison of different forest regeneration methods after windthrow. J For Sci. 60:190–197. DOI:10.17221/66/2013-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy DD, Magura T, Mizser S, Denbár Z, Tóthmérész B. 2016. Recovery of surface-dwelling assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) during clear-cut originated reforestation with native tree species. Period Biol. 118:195–203. DOI:10.18054/pb.2016.118.3.3927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä J, Halme E. 1992. Habitat associations of carabid beetles in fields and forests on the Ĺland Islands, SW Finland. Ecography. 15(1):3–11. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Stjernquist I, Bärring L, Schlyter P, Jöonsson AM, Samuelsson H. 2004. Recorded storm damage in Swedish forests 1901-2000. Forest Ecol Manag. 199:165–173. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittérus K, Åström M, Gunnarsson B. 2010. Commercial harvest of logging residue in clear-cuts affects the diversity and community composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Scand J Forest Res. 22:231–240. DOI:10.1080/02827580701352955.
   Google Scholar
• Otte J. 1989. Ecological investigations on importance of windthrow areas for the insect fauna. Part II. Waldhygiene. 18:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peterken G F. 1996. Natural woodland. Ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, White PS. 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard E. 1968. Hedges. IV. A comparision between Carabdae of a hedge and field site and those of woodland glade. J Appl Ecol. 5:649–657. doi: 10.2307/2401639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. R version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23) “Joy in Playing”; http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Schaetzl RJ, Johnson DL, Burns SF, Small TW. 1989. Tree uprooting: a review of terminology, process, and environmental implications. Can J Forest Res. 19:1–11. DOI:10.1139/x89-001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönenberger W. 2002. Post windthrow stand regeneration in Swiss mountain forests: the first ten years after the 1990 storm Vivian. For Snow Landsc Res. 77:61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Šerić Jelaska L, Dumbović V, Kučinić M. 2011. Carabid beetle diversity and mean individual biomass in beech forests of various ages. ZooKeys. 100:395–405. DOI:10.3897/zookeys.100.1536.
   Google Scholar
• Šerić Jelaska L, Durbešić P. 2009. Comparison of the body size and wing form of carabid speceis (Coleoptera: Caeabidae) between isolated and continuous forest habitats. Ann Soc Entomol Fr (n.s. 45(3):327–338. DOI:10.1080/00379271.2009.10697618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skłodowski J. 2006. Anthropogenic transformation of ground beetles assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland: from primeval forests to management woodlands of various ages. Entomol Fennica. 17:296–314. doi: 10.33338/ef.84349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skłodowski J. 2014. Consequence of the transformation of a primeval forest into a managed forest for carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – a case study from Białowieża (Poland). Eur J Entomol. 111(5):639–648. DOI:10.14411/eje.2014.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skłodowski J. 2017a. Three phases of changes in carabid assemblages during secondary succession in a pine forest disturbed by windthrow – results from the first 10 years of observations. Insect Conserv Diver. 10:449–461. DOI:10.1111/icad.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skłodowski J. 2017b. Manual soil preparation and piles of branches can support ground beetles (Coleoptera, carabidae) better than four different mechanical soil treatments in a clear-cut area of a closed-canopy pine forest in northern Poland. Scand J For Res. 32:123–133. DOI:10.1080/02827581.2016.1195868.
   Google Scholar
• Skłodowski J, Szczeszek J. 2015. Dead wood modifies mobility of ground beetles. Baltic J Coleopterol. 15:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sterzyńska M, Skłodowski J. 2018. Divergence of soil microarthropod (Hexapoda: Collembola) recovery patterns during natural regeneration and regeneration by planting of windthrown pine forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 429:414–424. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šustek Z, Vido J. 2013. Vegetation state and extreme drought as factors determining differentiation and succession of Carabidae coummunities in forests damaged by a windstorm in the high Tatra Mts. Biologia. 68:1198–1210. DOI:10.2478/s11756-013-0268- doi: 10.2478/s11756-013-0268-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szujecki A, Mazur S, Perliński S, Szyszko J. 1983. The process of forest soil macrofauna formation after afforestation of farmland. Warsaw: Warsaw Agricultural University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szyszko J. 1983. State of Carabidae (Col.) fauna in fresh pine forest and tentative valorization of this environment. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGGW-AR.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turin H. 2000. De Nedrelandse loopkevers. Verspreiding en oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Nationaal Natuurhistirisch Museum Naturalis. – KNNV Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Ulanova NG. 2000. The effects of windthrow on forest at different spatial scale: a review. Forest Ecol Manag. 135:155–167. DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venn SJ, Kotze DJ, Lassila T, Niemelä JK. 2013. Urban dry meadows provide valuable habitat for granivorous and xerophilic carabid beetles. Insect Conserv Diver. 17:747–764. DOI:10.1007/s10841-013-9558-8.
   Google Scholar
• Vican V, Svitok M, Michalková E, Lukáćik I, Stašiov S. 2018. Influence of tree species and soil properties on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities. Acta Oecol. 91:120–126. DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2018.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar