Persistent norms and the #MeToo effect in Swedish forestry education

References

• Alvinius A, Holmberg A. 2019. Silence-breaking butterfly effect: resistance towards the military within #metoo. Gender Work Org. 26:1255–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Lidestav G. 2015. Gender equality as a joint forestry sector strategy. Umeå: Department of Forest Resource Management. Swedish university of Agricultural Sciences. Report: 4442015.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Lidestav G. 2016. Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women’s networks. Forest Policy Econ. 67(1):38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelone DJ, Hirschman R, Suniga S, Armey M, Armelie A. 2005. The influence of peer interactions on sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles. 52:187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson S, Ågren M. 2019. Bringing diversity to nature: politicizing gender, race and class in environmental organizations? Environ Plann Nat Space. 2(4):874–898.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaenses S, Vandebosch H, Poels K, Van Cleemput K, DeSmet A, De Bourdeaudhuij I. 2015. ‘Can I afford to help?’ How affordances of communication modalities guide bystanders’ helping intentions towards harassment on social network sites. Behav Inf Technol. 4:425–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baublyte G, Korhonen D, DÁmato D, Toppinen A. 2019. “Being one of the boys”: perspectives from female forest industry leaders on gender diversity and the future of Nodic forest-based bioeconomy. Scand J Forest Res. 34(6):521–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz AD. 2010. Fostering healthy norms to prevent violence and abuse: the social norms approach. In Kaufman, editor, The prevention of sexual violence: a practitioner’s sourcebook. Holyoke: MA;NEARI Press; p. 147–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bird FB. 1996. The muted conscience. Moral silence and the practice of ethics in business. London: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco FJ, Herman T. 2010. Focus groups and collaborative research performances. In: DeLyser D., Herbert S., Aitken S., Crang M., McDowell L, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative geography. Los Angeles: SAGE; p. 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Brandth B, Haugen MS. 2005. Doing rural masculinity – from logging to outfield tourism. J Gend Stud. 14(1):13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho I, Costa C, Lykke N, Torres A. 2019. Beyond the glass ceiling: gendered tourism management. Ann Tour Res. 75:79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakroun R, Soudre-Lécué N. 2014. Identification of sexual harassment and legitimacy of employees to intervene: effects of provided information and hierarchial relationship. Arch Malad Profess Environ. 75:382–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connel R, Pearse R. 2015. Gender norms: are they the enemy of women’s rights? United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD). http://www.unrisd.org/beijing+20-connell-pearse.
   Google Scholar
• De Welde K, Stepnick A. 2015. Introduction: from people to policies. Enduring inequalities and inequities for women academics. In: De Welde K., Stepnick A., Pasque A., Penny A, editors. Disrupting the culture of silence. Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC; p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton RA, Mott HL. 2017. The bystander approach to violence prevention: considerations for implementation in Europe. Psychol Violence. 7(3):450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton RA, Mott HL. 2018. Evaluation of the intervention initiative: a bystander intervention program to prevent violence against women in universities. Violence Vict. 33(4):645–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton RA, Mott HL, McCartan K, Rumney P. 2016. A review of evidence for bystander intervention to prevent sexual and domestic violence in universities. Public Health England. PHE publications gateway number: 2016011.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Hulin CL, Gelfand MJ, Magley VJ. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. J Appl Psychol. 82(4):578–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fnais N, Soobiah C, Chen MH, Lillie E, Perrier L, Tashkhandi M, Straus SE, Mamdani M, Al-Omran M, Tricco AC. 2014. Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 89:817–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follo G. 2002. A hero’s journey: young women among males in forestry education. J Rural Stud. 18:293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• From hashtag to action. 2018. Open letter to SLU and the forest sector (Från hashtag till handling. Öppet brev till SLU och skogsnäringen).
   Google Scholar
• Government offices of Sweden. 2011. Competitiveness requires gender equality/Konkurrenskraft kräver jämställdhet. Gender equality strategy for the forestry sector/Jämställdhetsstrategi för skogsbrukssektorn. Linköping: LTAB.
   Google Scholar
• Government offices of Sweden. 2018. Uppdrag att inom ramen för nationella skogsprogrammet, föreslå åtgärder för en jämställd skogssektor. Jönköping: Regeringsbeslut, Näringsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Hennelly SE, Hussain S, Hale T, Cadle M, Brooke J, Davies E. 2019. University student attitudes to prosocial bystander behaviours. Health Educ. 119(5/6):408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning MA, Zhou C, Adams P, Moir F, Hobson J, Hallett C, Webster CS. 2017. Workplace harassment among staff in higher education: a systematic review. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 18:521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill E, Solomon Y, Dornan T, Stalmeijer R. 2015. ‘You become a man in a man’s world: is there discoursive space for women in surgery? Med Educ. 49:1207–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist. 2017. Analys och efterord. I Jämställdhet ger tillväxt. Exempel från det gröna näringslivet. LRFs Jämställdhetsakademi. https://www.lrf.se/om-lrf/uppdrag-vision-ochvardegrund/jamstalldhet/jamstalldhetsakademin/jamstalldhet-ger-tillvaxt/.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Andersson E, Johansson M, Lidestav G. 2019. The discursive resistance of men to gender equality interventions: Negotiating ‘unjustness’ and ‘unnecessity’ in Swedish forestry. Men Masc. 22(2):177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Johansson K, Andersson E. 2018. #MeToo in the Swedish forest sector: testimonies from harassed women on sexualised forms of male control. Scand J Forest Res. 33(5):419–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G., & Reed, M. (2010) Preface: Gender and forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25(sup9), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Andersson E, Berg Lejon S, Johansson K. 2011. Jämställt arbetsliv i skogssektorn – underlag för åtgärder. Umeå: Department of Forest Resource Management. Swedish university of Agricultural Sciences. Report: 3452011.
   Google Scholar
• LRF. 2018. #metoo I det gröna näringslivet. LRFs Jämställdhetsakademi. https://www.lrf.se/om-lrf/uppdrag-vision-och-vardegrund/jamstalldhet/jamstalldhetsakademin/metoo/.
   Google Scholar
• Mabry A, Turner MM. 2016. Do sexual assault and bystander interventions change men's intentions? Applying the theory of normative social behavior to predicting bystander outcomes. J Health Commun. 21(3):276–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald P. 2012. Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: a review of the literature. Int J Manag Rev. 14(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell L. 1999. Gender, identity and place: understanding feminist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisson EW, Milliken FJ. 2000. Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic word. Acad Manage Rev. 25(4):706–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers CA, Cowie H. 2019. Cyberbulling across the lifespan of education: issues and interventions from school to university. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(7):217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone M. 2018. The powerful and covert role of culture in gender discrimination and inequality. Contemp Psychoanal. 54(4):747–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page T, Pina A, Giner-Sorolla R. 2016. “It was only harmless banter!” The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale. Aggr Behav. 42:254–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paull M, Omari M, D'Cruz P, Güneri Çangarli B. 2019. Bystanders in workplace bullying: working university students’ perspectives on action versus inaction. Asia Pac J Human Resour. 58:313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell S. 2016. Gender equality and meritocracy. Contradictionary discourses in the Academy [PhD Thesis]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL. 2009. Framed before we know it. How gender shapes social relations. Gend Soc. 23:145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2010. Special issue: gender and forestry.
   Google Scholar
• SFA. 2014. Skogsstatistisk årsbok [Statistical yearbook of forestry]. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2019. Åtgärder för en jämställd skogssektor. Rapport 2019/4.
   Google Scholar
• Thomae M, Pina A. 2015. Sexist humour and social identity: the role of sexist humour in men’s ingroup cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity and victim blame. Humour. 28:187–204. https://www.landskogsbruk.se/skog/samarbete-ska-gora-skogsbranschen-mer-jamstalld/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio A, Paloniemi R. 2013. Adapting to gender order: Voluntary conservation by forest owners in Finland. Land Use Policy. 35:247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman K, Dolling A, Lidestav G, Rönnberg J. 2013. Genusintegrering och jämställdhetsarbete vid fakulteten för skogsvetenskap, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. Rapport 21.
   Google Scholar