References
- Ackzell L, Elfving B, Lindgren D. 1993. Occurrence of naturally regenerated and planted main crop plants in plantations in boreal Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 65(2–3):105–113.
- Ammer S, Weber K, Abs C, Ammer C, Prietzel J. 2006. Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of earthworm communities in pure and converted Scots pine stands. Appl Soil Ecol. 33(1):10–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.09.005.
- Bergquist J, Bergström R, Zakharenka A. 2003. Responses of young Norway spruce (Picea abies) to winter browsing by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): Effects on height growth and stem morphology. Scand J For Res. 18(4):368–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0282758031005431.
- Bergquist J, Fries C, Svensson L. 2017. Skogsstyrelsens återväxtuppföljning Resultat från 1999–2016.
- Bergquist J, Kalén C, Berglund H. 2011. Hjortdjurens inverkan på tillväxt av produktionsträd och rekrytering av betesbegärliga trädslag. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
- Bergquist J, Kullberg Y, Örlander G. 2001. Effects of shelterwood and soil scarification on deer browsing on planted Norway spruce Picea abies L. (Karst) seedlings. Forestry. 74(4):359–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/74.4.359.
- Bergquist J, Örlander G. 1996. Browsing deterrent and phytotoxic effects of roe deer repellents on Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. Scand J For Res. 11:145–152.
- Bergquist J, Örlander G. 1998. Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages: 2. Effect of seedling vigour. For Ecol Manag. 105(1–3):295–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00296-X.
- Bergström R, Bergqvist G. 1997. Frequencies and patterns of browsing by large herbivores on conifer seedlings. Scand J For Res. 12(3):288–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589709355412.
- Bergström R, Hjeljord O. 1987. Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland. Swedish Wildlife Research. 1:213–228.
- Burdet AN. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and their development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can J For Res. 20:415–427.
- Cederlund G. 1983. Home range dynamics and habitat selection by roe deer in a boreal area in central Sweden. Acta Theriol. 28:443–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.4098/at.arch.83-39.
- Cederlund G, Bergström R. 1996. Trends in the moose—forest system in Fennoscandia, with special reference to Sweden. Conservation of Faunal Diversity in Forested Landscapes. 265–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1521-3_10.
- Chauvat M, Titsch D, Zaytsev AS, Wolters V. 2011. Changes in soil faunal assemblages during conversion from pure to mixed forest stands. For Ecol Manag. 262(3):317–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.037.
- Danell K, Danel HK, Bergstrom R. 1985. Interaction between browsing moose and two species of birch in Sweden. Ecology. 66(6):1867–1878. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2937382.
- Day KR, Nordlander G, Kenis M, Halldorson G. 2004. General Biology and Life Cycles of Bark Weevils. In Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2241-8_14.
- Edenius L, Danell K, Nyquist H. 1994. Effects of simulated moose browsing on growth, mortality, and fecundity in Scots pine: relations to plant productivity. Can J For Res. 25(4):529–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x95-060.
- ESRI. 2010. ArcGIS Desktop release 10. Environment System Release Institute.
- Felton A, Lindbladh M, Brunet B, Fritz Ö. 2010. Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: An assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in Northern Europe. Forest Ecology &Management. 260:939–947.
- Felton A, Petersson L, Nilsson O, et al. 2019. The tree species matters: biodiversity and ecosystem service implications of replacing Scots pine production stands with Norway spruce. Ambio. 49(5):1035–1049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01259-x.
- Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309(5734):570–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772.
- Gill RMA. 1992. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests:3. impact on trees and forests. Forestry. 65:363–388.
- Harmer R. 2001. The effect of plant competition and simulated summer browsing by deer on tree regeneration. J Appl Ecol. 38(5):1094–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00664.x.
- Holmström E, Gålnander H, Petersson M. 2018. Within-site variation in seedling survival in Norway spruce plantations. Forests. 10(2):8–10.
- Kabrick J, Dey D, Gwaze D. 2006. Shortleaf Pine Restoration and Ecology in the Ozarks: Proceedings of a Symposium. The Missouri department of conservation, USA.
- Lodin I. 2020. Current versus alternative forest management practices in southern Sweden. PhD dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
- Loftis DL, McGee CE. 1993. Symposium Proceedings, 1992 September 8-10, Knoxville, Tennessee.
- Månsson J, Kalén C, Kjellander P, Andrén H, Smith H. 2007. Quantitative estimates of tree species selectivity by moose (Alces alces) in a forest landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 22(5):407–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701515023.
- Miller GR, Kinnaird JW, Cummins RP. 1982. Liability of saplings to browsing on a red deer range in the Scottish highlands. J Appl Ecol. 19:941–951.
- Mysterud A. 2000. Diet overlap among Fennoscandia. Oecologia. 124(1):130–137.
- Nilsson U, Elfving B, Karlsson K. 2012. Productivity of Norway spruce compared to Scots pine in the interior of Northern Sweden. Silva Fenn. 46(2):197–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.54.
- Nilsson U, Fahlvik N, Johansson U, Lundström A, Rosvall O. 2011. Simulation of the effect of intensive forest management on forest production in Sweden. Forests. 2(1):373–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f2010373.
- Nilsson U, Luoranen J, Kolström T, Örlander G, Puttonen P. 2010. Reforestration with planting in Northern Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 25(4):283–294.
- Nilsson U, Örlander G, Karlsson M. 2006. Establishing mixed forests in Sweden by combining planting and natural regeneration-effects of shelterwoods and scarification. For Ecol Manag. 237(1–3):301–311.
- Örlander G, Nilsson U. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 14(4):341–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589950152665.
- Palmer SCF, Truscott AM. 2003. Browsing by deer on naturally regenerating Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and its effects on sapling growth. For Ecol Manag. 182(1–3):31–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00026-4.
- Persson IL, Kjell D, Roger B. 2005. Different moose densities and accompanied changes in tree morphology and browse production. Ecol Appl. 15(4):1296–1305.
- Petersson L. 2019. Replacing Scots pine with Norway spruce. PhD dissertation. Swedish University of Agricultural Science.
- Shimoda K, Kimura K, Kanzaki M, Yoda K. 1994. The regeneration of pioneer tree species under browsing pressure of sika deer in an evergreen oak forest. Ecol Res. 9(1):85–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347245.
- Swedish National Forest Survey. 2010. http://www.slu.se/en/collaborative-centres-andprojects/swedish-national-forest-inventory/.
- Sydow V. 1997. Abundance of pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) and damage to conifer seedlings in relation to the silvicultural practices. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Researches. 12:157–167.
- Wallgren M, Bergström R, Bergqvist G, Olsson M. 2002. Spatial distribution of browsing and tree damage by moose in young pine forests, with implications for the forest industry. For Ecol Manag. 305:229–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.057.