Forest ownership objectives and their connection with forestry activities: a confirmatory approach to studying gender differences

References

• Ajzen I. 1985. From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior. In: J. Kuhl, J. Beckman, editors. Action control: from cognitions to behaviors. New York, NY: Springer; p. 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Johansson M, Lidestav G, Lindberg M. 2018. Constituting gender and gender equality through policy. The political of gender mainstreaming in the Swedish forest industry. Equal Divers Incl Int J. 37(8):763–779. doi:10.1108/EDI-10-2017-0208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Lidestav G. 2016. Creating alternative spaces and articulating needs: challenging gendered notions of forestry and forest ownership through women’s networks. For Policy Econ. 67:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora-Jonsson S. 2005. Unsettling the order. Gendered subjects and grassroots activism in two forest communities [diss]. Uppsala: Sveriges lantbruksuniv., Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 1652–6880; 2005:70 ISBN 91-576-6969-4.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R, Yi Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 16(1):74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir A, Sjølie HK, Solberg B. 2020. Determinants of nonindustrial private forest owners’ willingness to harvest timber in Norway. Forests. 2020(11):60. doi:10.3390/f11010060.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstén S, Andersson E, Keskitalo ECH. 2020. Same-same but different: gendering forest ownership in Sweden. For Policy Econ. 115:102162. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ. 2004. An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners. Scand J For Res. 19(S4):45–55. doi:10.1080/14004080410034056.
   Google Scholar
• Brandth B, Haugen MS. 2005. Text, body, and tools: changing me diations of rural masculinity. Men Masc. 8(2):148–163. doi:10.1177/1097184X05277716.
   Google Scholar
• Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson BJ, Andrejczyk K, Butler SM, Markowski-Lindsay M. 2016. USDA forest service national woodland owner survey: national, regional, and state statistics for family forest and woodland ownerships with 10+ acres, 2011–2013. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service Res. Bull. NRS-99, Northern Research Station. doi:10.2737/NRS-RB-99.
   Google Scholar
• Butler SM, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Butler BJ, Tyrrell M. 2017. The role of gender in management behaviors on family forest lands in the United States. J Forest. 116(1):32–40. doi:10.5849/jof.2016-076R2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung G, Rensvold R. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 9(2):233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan A, Jones S. 1993. Do landowner practices reflect beliefs?: implications of an extension-research partnership. J For. 91(10):39–45. doi:10.1093/jof/91.10.39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L. 2018. Explaining gender differences in private forest risk management. Scand J For Res. 33(7):716–723. doi:10.1080/02827581.2018.1453944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C. 2009. Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. For Sci. 55(6):512–523. doi:10.1093/forestscience/55.6.512.
   Google Scholar
• Ficko A, Lidestav G, Ní Dhubháin Á, Karppinen H, Živojinović I, Westin K. 2019. European private forest owner typologies: a review of methods and use. For Policy Econ. 99:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follo G, Lidestav G, Ludvig A, Vilkriste L, Hujala T, Karppinen H, Didolot F, Mizaraite D. 2017. Gender in European forest ownership and management: reflections on women as “New forest owners”. Scand J For Res. 32(2):174–184. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1195866.
   Google Scholar
• French B, Finch W. 2008. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: locating the invariant referent sets. Struct Equ Modeling Multidiscip J. 15:96–113. doi:10.1080/10705510701758349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene JL, Blatner KA. 1986. Identifying woodland owner characteristics associated with timber management. For Sci. 32(1):135–146. doi:10.1093/forestscience/32.1.135.
   Google Scholar
• Häggqvist P, Berg Lejon S, Lidestav G. 2014. Look at what they do – a revised approach to communication strategy towards private forest owners. Scand J For Res. 29(7):697–706. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.960894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2014. Changing objectives of non-industrial private forest ownership: a confirmatory approach to measurement model testing. Can J For Res. 44(4):290–300. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2015. Forest owners’ socio-demographic characteristics as predictors of customer value: evidence from Finland. Small-Scale For. 14(1):19–37. doi:10.1007/s11842-014-9271-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyrinen L, Mattila O, Berghäll S, Toppinen A. 2016. Lifestyle of health and sustainability of forest owners as an indicator of multiple use of forests. Forest Policy and Economics. 67:10–19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley P. 2013. Examining farm forest owners’ forest management in Ireland: The role of economic, lifestyle and multifunctional ownership objectives. J Environ Manag. 123C:105–112. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• Huff E. 2017. A national perspective on women owning woodlands (WOW) networks. J Ext. 55(2). doi:10.34068/joe.55.02.08.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hujala T, Karppinen H, Kurttila M. 2013. Customer segments among family forest owners: combining ownership objectives and decision-making styles. Small-Scale For. 12(3):335–351. doi:10.1007/s11842-012-9215-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvönen P. 2010. Metsänomistajien puukaupan suunnitteluun liittyvien palveluiden käyttö. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ingemarson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L. 2006. A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21(3):249–259. doi:10.1080/02827580600662256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Andersson E, Johansson M, Lidestav G. 2019. The discursive resistance of men to gender-equality interventions: negotiating “unjustness” and “unnecessity” in Swedish forestry. Men Masc. 22(2):177–196. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Andersson E, Johansson M, Lidestav G. 2020. Conditioned openings and restraints: The meaning-making of women professionals breaking into the male-dominated sector of forestry. Gend Work Organ. 27(6):927–943. doi:10.1111/gwao.12403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi S, Arano KG. 2009. Determinants of private forest management decisions: a study on West Virginia NIPF landowners. For Policy Econ. 11:118–125. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn. 32(1):43–59. doi:10.14214/sf.699.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Horne P. 2020. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2020. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus 30/2020. Luonnonvarakeskus. Helsinki. 73 s. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Kendra A, Hull RB. 2005. Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. For. Sci. 51(2):142–154. doi:10.1093/forestscience/51.2.142.
   Google Scholar
• Kline JD, Alig RJ, Johnson RL. 2000. Fostering the production of nontimber services amongst forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. For Sci 46(2):302–311. doi:10.1093/forestscience/46.2.302.
   Google Scholar
• Kline R. 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlman J, Berghäll S, Vaino A. 2023. Making gender visible: objectives and socio-demographic differences among women forest owners. For Policy Econ. 151:102966. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102966, ISSN 1389-9341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Uusivuori J. 2014. Effects of gender and length of land tenure on timber supply in Finland. J For Econ. 20:363–379. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci. 42(3):300–309. doi:10.1093/forestscience/42.3.300.
   Google Scholar
• Laaksonen S. 2013. Surveymetodiikka. Aineiston kokoamisesta puhdistamisen kautta analyysiin. 2nd ed. Ventus Publishing ApS. ISBN 978-87-403-0503-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki M, Matilainen A. 2014. Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland. Scand J For Res. 29(2):101–110. doi:10.1080/02827581.2013.869348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo Ambjörnsson E. 2020. Performing female masculinities and negotiating femininities: challenging gender hegemonies in Swedish forestry through women’s networks. Gend Place Cult. 28(11):1584–1605. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2020.1825215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo Ambjörnsson E. 2021. Gendered performances in Swedish Forestry negotiating subjectivities in women-only networks. Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in geography with emphasis on human geography at Stockholm University. Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University. [accessed 2002 May 5]. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1546539/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lei PW, Wu Q. 2007. Introduction to structural equation modeling: issues and practical considerations. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 26(3):33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G. 1998. Women as non-industrial private forest landowners in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 13:66–73. doi:10.1080/02827589809382963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G. 2010. In competition with a brother: women's inheritance positions in contemporary Swedish family forestry. Scand J For Res. 25:14–24. doi:10.1080/02827581.2010.506781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Berg Lejon S. 2013. Harvesting and silvicultural activities in Swedish family forestry – behavior changes from a gender perspective. Scand J For Res. 28:136–142. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.701324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Ekström M. 2000. Introducing gender in studies on management behaviour among non-industrial private forest owners. Scand J For Res. 15:378–386. doi:10.1080/028275800448011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Johansson M, Huff E. 2019. Gender perspectives on forest services in the rise of a bioeconomy discourse. In: T. Hujala, A. Toppinen, B.J. Butler, editors. Service in family forestry. world forests 24. Springer, p. 307–325. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28999-7_15.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Nordfjell T. 2005. A conceptual model for understanding social practices in family forestry. Small-Scale For Econ Manage Policy. 4:391–408. doi:10.1007/s11842-005-0024-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Sjölander AE. 2007. Gender and forestry: A critical discourse analysis of forestry professions in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 22(4):351–362. doi:10.1080/02827580701504928.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Thellbro C, Sandström P, Lind T, Holm E, Olsson O, Westin K, Karppinen H, Ficko A. 2017. Interactions between forest owners and their forests. In: E.C.H. Keskitalo, editor. Globalisation and change in forest ownership and forest use. Palgrave Mcmillan; p. 81–94. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57116-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Wästerlund D, editors 1999. Women and forestry: proceedings of the Nordic-Baltic workshop in Balsjö. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Lindroos K. 2005. Metsänomistajien tavoitteet sekä tieto- ja neuvontatarpeet. Pellervo Economic Research Institute Working Papers 76.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar I, Teeter L, Butler B. 2008. Characterizing family forest owners: a cluster analysis approach. For. Sci. 54(2):176–184. doi:10.1093/forestscience/54.2.176.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama G. 1998. Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald RP, Ho M-HR. 2002. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychol Methods. 7(1):64–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsäkeskus. 2022. Statistics of Finnish forest owners. https://www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/tietoa-metsien-omistuksesta/yksityiset-metsanomistajat-asuinpaikan-mukaan.
   Google Scholar
• Metsämuuronen J. 2009. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä. International Methelp, Jyväskylä (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Ní Dhubháin Á, Cobanova R, Karppinen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S. 2007. The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small Scale For. 6(4):347–357. doi:10.1007/s11842-007-9030-2.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen A, Pettenella D, Slee B. 2007. Barriers and opportunities for the development of small-scale forest enterprises in Europe. Small Scale For. 6(4):331–345. doi:10.1007/s11842-007-9035-x.
   Google Scholar
• Palander T, Ovaskainen H, Tikkanen L. 2009. Profiles of private forest owners and the importance of landscape-scale management in the timber trade process of Finnish wood procurement. Forestry. 82(2):227–239. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpp006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rämö A-K, Toivonen R. 2007. Metsä- ja puukauppapalveluiden laatu ja sen ulottuvuudet metsänomistajan näkökulmasta. Pellervo Economic Research Institute Working Papers 203.
   Google Scholar
• Redmore LE, Tynon JF. 2010. WOWnet: A communication and networking model for women. J Ext. 48(5):Article 5FEA2. https://www.joe.org/joe/2010october/a2.php.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MG. 2003. Marginality and gender at work in forestry communities of British Columbia, Canada. J Rural Stud. 19(3):373–389. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00021-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F. 2010. Private forest ownership in Europe, Geneva timber and forest study paper 26. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Silver JE, Leahy JE, Weiskittel AR, Noblet CL, Kittredge DB. 2015 Sept. An evidence-based review of timber harvesting behavior among private woodland owners. Journal of Forestry. 113(5):490–499. doi:10.5849/jof.14-089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JP. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen R, Järvinen E, Lindroos K, Rämö A. 2005. The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: the Estonia and Finland cases. small-scale forest economics. Manage Policy. 4(4):451–470. doi:10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.
   Google Scholar
• Uliczka H, Angelstam P, Jansson G, Bro A. 2004. Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scand J For Res. 19:274–288. doi:10.1080/02827580410029318.
   Google Scholar
• Umaerus P, Högvall-Nordin M, Lidestav G. 2019. Do female forest owners think and act “greener”? For Policy Econ. 99:52–58. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umaerus P, Lidestav G, Eriksson LO, Högvall Nordin M. 2013. Gendered business activities in family farm forestry: from round wood delivery to health service. Scand J For Res. 28(6):596–607. doi:10.1080/02827581.2013.793385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart J, Courtney P, Sleeb B. 2012. Private woodland owners’ perspectives on multifunctionality in English woodlands. J Rural Stud. 28(1):95–106. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio A, Paloniemi R. 2013. Adapting to the gender order: voluntary conservation by forest owners in Finland. Land Use Policy. 35(2013):247–256. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2023. Gender and health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1.
   Google Scholar