Birch distribution and changes in stand structure in Sweden’s young forests

References

• Ara M, Barbeito I, Kalén C, Nilsson U. 2021. Regeneration failure of Scots pine changes the species composition of young forests. Scand J Forest Res. 37(2022):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2021.2005133.
   Google Scholar
• Ashburner K, McAllister HA. 2016. The genus Betula: a taxonomic revision of birches. Reprinted with corrections, 2016: Kew publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bärring U. 1978. The use of phenoxy herbicides in Swedish forestry: amounts, types, and modes of application. Ecol Bull. 27:219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist J, Eriksson A, Fries C. 2011. Polytax 5/7 återväxttaxering: Resultat från 1999–2009 [The forest regeneration monitoring by the Swedish Forest Agency. Results from 1999–2009].
   Google Scholar
• Cameron AD. 1996. Managing birch woodlands for the production of quality timber. Forest Inter J Forest Res. 69:357–371.
   Google Scholar
• Database Name. 2020. Luke. Available from: httpa://statdb.luke.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Database Name. 2022. Skogsstyrelsen [Swedish Forest Agency]. Available from: https://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/sjalvservice/karttjanster/geodatatjanster/.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson H, Johansson U, Lundgren LN. 1996. Glasbjörk eller vårtbjörk? – metoder för artbestämning [Downey birch or silver birch? – methods for species determination]. Fakta skog. 1:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Felton A, Andersson E, Ventorp D, Lindbladh M. 2011. A comparison of avian diversity in spruce monocultures and spruce-birch polycultures in Southern Sweden. Silva Fenn. 45:1143–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton A, Hedwall P-O, Trubins R, Lagerstedt J, Felton A, Lindbladh M. 2021. From mixtures to monocultures: Bird assemblage responses along a production forest conifer-broadleaf gradient. For Ecol Manag. 494:119299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton A, Nilsson U, Sonesson J, Felton AM, Roberge J-M, Ranius T, Ahlström M, Bergh J, Björkman C, Boberg J. 2016. Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: Ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio. 45:124–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Lindner M, Abs C, Lasch P. 2002. Vegetation dynamics in central European forest ecosystems (near-natural as well as managed) after storm events. Folia Geobot. 37:17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J, Weisberg S. 2019. An R companion to applied regression. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman J, Holm S, Nilsson M, Nilsson P, Ringvall AH, Ståhl G. 2014. Adapting national forest inventories to changing requirements–the case of the Swedish national forest inventory at the turn of the 20th century. Silva Fenn. 48:1095. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries C. 1984. Den frösådda björkens invandring på hygget. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift. 82(3/4):35–49. In: Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• FSC. 2020. The FSC national forest stewardship standard of Sweden. (FSC-STD-SWE-03-2019 EN).
   Google Scholar
• Götmark F, Fridman J, Kempe G, Norden B. 2005. Broadleaved tree species in conifer-dominated forestry: regeneration and limitation of saplings in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 214:142–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund B, Lundmark J-E. 1981. Handledning i bonitering med Skogshögskolans boniteringssystem. D. 1, Definitioner och anvisningar: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson L, George MR, Gärdenäs A.. 2017. Markberedning i svenskt skogsbruk nu och i framtiden med fokus på miljökonsekvenser. Department of Soil and Environment, SLU. 1–26.CLEO-rapport D1.2.2
   Google Scholar
• Hedwall PO, Holmström E, Lindbladh M, Felton A. 2019. Concealed by darkness: how stand density can override the biodiversity benefits of mixed forests. Ecosphere.10:e02835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heräjärvi H. 2001. Technical properties of mature birch (Betula pendula and B. pubescens) for saw milling. Silva Fenn. 35:469–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgén P, Hånell B. 2000. Performance of planted and naturally regenerated seedlings in Picea abies-dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 127:129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström E, Carlström T, Goude M, Lidman FD, Felton A. 2021. Keeping mixtures of Norway spruce and birch in production forests: insights from survey data. Scand J Forest Res. 36:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2021.1883729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström E, Ekö PM, Hjelm K, Karlsson M, Nilsson U. 2016a. Natural regeneration on planted clearcuts—the easy way to mixed forest?. Open J For. 6:281–294. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2016.64023.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström E, Gålnander H, Petersson M. 2019. Within-site variation in seedling survival in Norway spruce plantations. Forests. 10:181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström E, Hjelm K, Johansson U, Karlsson M, Valkonen S, Nilsson U. 2016b. Pre-commercial thinning, birch admixture and sprout management in planted Norway spruce stands in South Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 31:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen S, Domisch T, Finér L, Hantula J, Hynynen J, Matala J, Miina J, Neuvonen S, Nevalainen S, Niemistö P. 2021. What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem services in boreal forests in Fennoscandia? For Ecol Manag. 479:118558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J. 1993. Self-thinning models for even-aged stands of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula. Scand J Forest Res. 8:326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Niemistö P, Viherä-Aarnio A, Brunner A, Hein S, Velling P. 2009. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in northern Europe. Forestry. 83:103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Ring E, Hogbom L. 2013. Effects of pre-harvest fertilization and subsequent soil scarification on the growth of planted Pinus sylvestris seedlings and ground vegetation after clear-felling. Silva Fenn. 47:1–14. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson A. 2002. Site preparation of abandoned fields and early establishment of planted small-sized seedlings of silver birch. New For. 23:159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M. 2001. Natural regeneration of broadleaved tree species in Southern Sweden [Doctoral thesis]. Alnarp: Swedish university of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M. 2003. Naturlig föryngring av björk i södra sverige. Umeå: Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M, Nilsson U. 2005. The effects of scarification and shelterwood treatments on naturally regenerated seedlings in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 205:183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Holmström E, Hynynen J, Nilsson U, Korhonen KT, Westerlund B, Bianchi S, Aldea J, Huuskonen S. 2023. Current state of mixed forests available for wood supply in Finland and Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 38:442–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidman FD, Holmström E, Lundmark T, Fahlvik N. 2021. Management of spontaneously regenerated mixed stands of birch and Norway spruce in Sweden. Silva Fenn. 55:19. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidman FD, Karlsson M, Lundmark T, Sängstuvall L, Holmström E. 2023. Birch establishes anywhere! So, what is there to know about natural regeneration and direct seeding of birch? New For. 55(2024):157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-023-09971-z.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbladh M, Lindström Å, Hedwall P-O, Felton A. 2017. Avian diversity in Norway spruce production forests–How variation in structure and composition reveals pathways for improving habitat quality. For Ecol Manag. 397:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisberg Jensen E. 2006. Sätt stopp för sprutet! Från arbetsmiljöproblem till ekologisk risk i 1970-talets debatt om hormoslyr och DDT i skogsbruket. In: Miljöhistoria över gränser. Malmö högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren L, Pan H, Theander O, Eriksson H, Johansson U, Svenningsson M. 1995. Development of a new chemical method for distinguishing between Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Can J For Res. 25:1097–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemistö P. 2013. Effect of growing density on biomass and stem volume growth of downy birch stands on peatland in Western and Northern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Gemmel P, Johansson U, Karlsson M, Welander T. 2002. Natural regeneration of Norway spruce, Scots pine and birch under Norway spruce shelterwoods of varying densities on a mesic-dry site in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 161:133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren M, Kellomäki S. 1983. Effect of shading on leaf structure and photosynthesis in young birches, Betula pendula Roth. and B. Pubescens Ehrh. For Ecol Manag. 7:119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Gemmel P, Hunt J. 1990. Site preparation: a Swedish overview: BC Ministry of Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Östlund L, Laestander S, Aurell G, Hörnberg G. 2022. The war on deciduous forest: large-scale herbicide treatment in the Swedish boreal forest 1948 to 1984. Ambio. 51:1352–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perala DA, Alm AA. 1990. Regeneration silviculture of birch: a review. For Ecol Manag. 32:39–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2020. Density and growth of forest stands revisited. Effect of the temporal scale of observation, site quality, and thinning. For Ecol Manag. 460:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulo J. 1987. Björkboken [The birch book]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Riksskogstaxeringen. 2022. Ej publicerade data. https://www.slu.se/riksskogstaxeringen. In: Umeå Institutionen för skoglig resurshushållning, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Rousi M, Possen BJ, Pulkkinen P, Mikola J. 2019. Using long-term data to reveal the geographical variation in timing and quantity of pollen and seed production in silver and pubescent birch in Finland: implications for gene flow, hybridization and responses to climate warming. For Ecol Manag. 438:25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemaa M, Hotanen J-P, Oksanen J, Tonteri T, Merilä P. 2023. Broadleaved trees enhance biodiversity of the understorey vegetation in boreal forests. For Ecol Manag. 546:121357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloerke B, Cook D, Larmarange J, Briatte F, Marbach M, Thoen E, Elberg AJC. 2021. GGally: Extension to ‘ggplot2’, R package version 2.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 1979. Skogsvårdslagen In: 1979:429: Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet RSL.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 1993. Skogsvårdsförordningen. In: 1993:1096: Landsbygds- och infrastrukturdepartementet RSL.
   Google Scholar
• Skogsstyrelsen. 2014. Skogsstatistisk årsbok (Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry).
   Google Scholar
• Skogsstyrelsen. 2024. [Official Statistics of Sweden]. Statistisk databas. [accessed 2024 Mar 27]. https://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/en/statistics/statistical-database/.
   Google Scholar
• Skogsvårdslagstiftningen. In. 2019. Jönköping: Skogsstyreslen.
   Google Scholar
• SLU. 2023. Skogsdata 2023: aktuella uppgifter om de svenska skogarna från SLU Riksskogstaxeringen [Forest statistics 2023: current data about the Swedish forests, from SLU, The Swedish national forest inventory]. Umeå, Sweden: H Petersson. (0280-0543).
   Google Scholar
• Sutinen R, Teirilä A, Pänttäjä M, Sutinen M-L. 2002. Distribution and diversity of tree species with respect to soil electrical characteristics in Finnish Lapland. Can J For Res. 32:1158–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanha-Majamaa I, Jalonen J. 2001. Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scand J Forest Res. 16:79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woxblom L, Nylinder M. 2010. Industrial utilization of hardwood in Sweden. Ecol Bull. 53:43–50.
   Google Scholar