Seasonal Variation in the Occurrence of Late Adverse Skin Reactions to Iodine-Based Contrast Media

References

• AAKHUS T., SOMMERFELT S. C., STORMORKEN H. & DAHLSTRöM K.: Tolerance and excretion of iohexol after intravenous injection in healthy volunteers. Preliminary re-port. Acta Radiol. 21 (1980), Suppl 362, p. 131.
   Google Scholar
• ABRAmsoN J. H. & GAHLINGER P M.: Computer programs for epidemiologists, p. 214. PEPI, version 3.0. Brixton Books, Llanidloes 1999.
   Google Scholar
• ALLEN J. E.: Drug-induced photosensitivity. Clin. Pharm. 12 (1993), 580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BERNHARD J. D., PTAHKA N. I. A., KOCHEVAR I. E. & PAR-ISH J. A.: Abnormal reactions to ultraviolet radiation. In: Dermatology in general medicine, 3rd edn., p. 1481. Edited by T. Fitzpatrick et al. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York 1987.
   Google Scholar
• BEYERENKE S. A. & ZEITLER E.: Late adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. A cohort analytic study. Eur. Radiol. 3 (1993), 237.
   Google Scholar
• DEBATIN J. F., COHAN R. H., ZAKRZEWSKI C. B. & DUN-NICK N. R.: Selective use of low-osmolal contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 26 (1991), 1721.
   Google Scholar
• Dooms-GoossENs A., LESAFFRE E., HEIDBUCHEL M., Dooms M. & DEGREFF H.: UV sunlight and patch test reactions in humans. Contact Dermatitis 19 (1988), 36.
   Google Scholar
• EDGREN J., KIVISAARI A., LAASONEN L. & STANDERT-SKJ&D-NORDENSTAM C.-G.: Urography with iohexol. Acta Radiol. 23 (1983), Suppl. 366, p. 46.
   Google Scholar
• FoTiALEs J., SOTER N. A. & Lim H. M.: Results of evalu-ation of 203 patients for photosensitivity in a 7.3 year period. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 33 (1995), 597.
   Google Scholar
• GRAINGER R. G.: Osmolality and osmolality-related side effects. In: Contrast media from the past to the future. Thi-eme Medical Publishers, New York 1987.
   Google Scholar
• HAMA R., SAKAGAMI A. & MORI K.: Delayed hypersensitiv-ity similar to I-type one caused by low-osmolar iodine con-trast media. Jpn. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 20 (1989), 243.
   Google Scholar
• HARTH Y. & RAPOPORT M.: Photosensitivity associated with antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics. Drug Safety 14 (1996), 252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARTWIG P, MILTZEL W. & TAENZER V.: Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate. In: Recent developments in nonionic contrast media, p. 220. Edited by V. Taenzer and S. Wende. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York 1989.
   Google Scholar
• HIGAsm T. S. & KATAYAMA M.: The delayed adverse reac-tions of low osmolar contrast media. Nippon Igaku Hosh-asen Gakkai Zasshi 50 (1990), 1359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HIGASHI T., TAKIZAWA K., NAGASHIMA J. et al.: Prospective two-phase study of delayed symptoms after intravenous in-jection of low-osmolality contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 26 (1991), Suppl. 1, p. 37.
   Google Scholar
• KATZBERG R. M.: Renal effects of contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 23 (1988), Suppl. 1, p. 157.
   Google Scholar
• MAMMEN L. & SCHMIDT C.: Photosensitivity reactions. A case report involving NSAIDs. Am. Fam. Physician 52 (1995), 575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCULLOUGH M., DAVIES P & RICHARDSON R.: A large trial of intravenous Conray 325 and Niopam 300 to assess im-mediate and delayed reactions. Br. J. Radiol. 62 (1989), 260.
   Google Scholar
• METEOROLOGICAL YEARBOOK OF FINLAND 1993; Vol. 81-90, part 4:1. Published by the Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsiniki.
   Google Scholar
• MIITZEL W, NAGEL R., KEMPER J. D. & CLAU B. W: Phar-makokinetik des nichtionischen Röntgenkontrastmittels Iohexol. Akt. Urol. 15 (1984), 154.
   Google Scholar
• MIKKONEN R., KONTKANEN T. & KIVISAARI L.: Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media. Acta Radiol. 36 (1995), 72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOORE R. D., STEINBERG E. P, POWE N. R. et al.: Fre-quency and determinants of adverse reactions induced by high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 170 (1989), 727.
   Google Scholar
• NIENDORF H. P.: Experimental and clinical data. In: Delay-ed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media, p. 3. Sec-ond expert panel meeting on mechanism. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1996.
   Google Scholar
• PANTO P & DAVIES P: Delayed reactions to urographic con-trast media. Br. J. Radiol 59 (1986), 41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAUL E. & GREILICH K. D.: Epidemiology of urticaria dis-eases. Hautarzt 42 (1991), 366.
   Google Scholar
• SORTLAND 0., JOHANSSEN J. G., OKSENDAL A. N. & WAALER A.: Iopentol in urography. A clinical comparison between iopentol and metrizoate including delayed reactions. Acta Radiol. 33 (1992), 368.
   Google Scholar
• WOLF G., ARENSON R. & CROSS A.: A prospective trial of ionic vs. nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical prac-tice. AJR 152 (1989), 939.
   Google Scholar
• WOLF K. J., HARLFINGER 0., WEDLER E., ZUCKERT D. & MULLER U.: The influence of meteorological conditions on the side effects of contrast media during infusion uro-grams. R6F0 135 (1981), 721.
   Google Scholar
• WOLF G. L., MISHKIN M. M., Roux S. C. et al.: Compari-son of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents. Invest. Radiol. 26 (1991), 404.
   Google Scholar
• YAMAGUCHI K., TAKANASHI I., KANAUCHI T., HOSHI T. & KUBOTA H.: A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reac-tions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 52 (1992), 1565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YOSHIKAWA H.: Late adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. Radiology 183 (1992), 737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar