REFERENCES
- BOULAY G. H., HAWKES S., LEE C.-C., TEATHER B. A. & TEATHER D.: Comparing the cost of spinal MR with con-ventional myelography and radiculography. Neuroradi-ology 32 (1990), 124.
- DUKE C. F & Ws P. F G.: Head and neck tumours, MRI versus CT. A technology assessment pilot study. Eur. J. Radiol. 14 (1992), 235.
- DIXON A. K., SOUTHERN J. P., TEALE A. et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine. Effective for the clinician or the patient. BMJ 302 (1991), 78.
- HAUGHTON V. M., Ram A. A., SOBOCINSKI K. A. et al.: A blinded clinical comparison of MR imaging and CT in neuroradiology. Radiology 160 (1995), 751.
- HILLMAN B. J.: Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis for diagnostic imaging. Radiology 193 (1994), 307.
- MACKENZIE R. & DIXON A. K.: Measuring the effects of im-aging. An evaluative framework. Clin. Radiol. 50 (1995), 513.
- NEW P F J., ARONOW S. & HESSELINK J. R.: National Can-cer Institute study. Evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnoses of intracranial neoplasms. Neuroradiolgy 136 (1980), 665.
- PHELPS C. E. & MUSHLIN A. I.: Focusing technology assess-ment using medical decision theory. Med. Decis. Making 8 (1988), 279.
- PUULEART C. A. B. J., FIGLEY M. M. & MARGULIS A. R.: The impact of new imaging technology on heath care, re- search and teaching. An international symposium. AJR 149 (1987), 1111.
- SCHöRNER E., SCHUBES P, HENKES H., ROTTACKER C., HAMM B. & FELIX R.: Intracranial meningeomas. Compari-son of plain and contrast-enhanced examinations in CT and MRI. Neuroradiology 32 (1995), 12.
- SMITH W L.: A new job for the radiologist. AJR 163 (1994), 263.
- SPAGNOLI M. V, GOLDBERG H. I., GROSSMAN R. I. et al.: Intracranial meningeomas. High-field MR imaging. Radi-ology 161 (1986), 369.
- SZCZEPURA A. K., FLETCHER J. & FITZ-PATRICK J. D.: Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the neuro-sciences. BMJ 303 (1991), 1435.
- THORNBURY J. R.: Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Love it or leave it. AJR 162 (1994), 1.
- THORNBURY J. R.: Why should radiologist be interested in technology assessment and outcomes research. AJR 163 (1994), 1027.
- WITTENBERG J., FINEBERG H. V, FERRUCCI J. T. et al.: Clin-ical efficacy of computed body tomography, II. AJR 134 (1979), 1111.
- WORTZMAN G., RICHARD C. H. & MORGAN P P: Cranial computed tomography. An evaluation of cost effectiveness. Neuroradiology 117 (1975), 75.
- ZYLAK C. J. & GAFNI A.: A methodologic overview of the evaluation of costs and benefits in diagnostic radiology. In-vest. Radiol. 27 (1992), 483.