Early Response of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases to Chemotherapy Evaluated with Mr Imaging

REFERENCES

• AHLSTROM K. H. & ASTROM K. G.: CT-guided bone biopsy performed by means of a coaxial biopsy system with an eccentric drill. Radiology 188 (1993), 549). 205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AITCHISON E A., POON F. W, HADLEY M. D., GRAY H. W & FORRESTER A. W: Vertebral metastases and an equivocal bone scan. Value of magnetic resonance imaging. Nucl. Med. Commun. 13 (1992), 429.
   Google Scholar
• ALGRA P R., BLOEM J. L., TISSING H., FALKE T. H., ARNDT J. W. & VERBOOM L. J.: Detection of vertebral metastases. Comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. Radiographics 11 (1991), 219.
   Google Scholar
• AVRAHAMI E., TADMOR R., DALLY 0. & HADAR H.: Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 13 (1989), 598.
   Google Scholar
• BITRAN J. D., BEKERMAN C. & DESSER R. K.: The predictive value of serial bone scans in assessing response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 45 (1980), 1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoLLow M., KNAUF W, KORFEL A. et al.: Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7 (1997), 241.
   Google Scholar
• BROWN A. L., MIDDLETON G., MACVICAR A. D. & Hus-BAND J. E.: Ti-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer vertebral metastases. Changes on treatment and correlation with response to therapy [published er-ratum appears in Clin. Radiol. 53 (1998), 935]. Clin. Radiol. 53 (1998), 493.
   Google Scholar
• CARLSON K., AsTRöm G., NYMAN R., AHLSTRöM H. & SI-MONSSON B.: MR imaging of multiple myeloma in tumour mass measurement at diagnosis and during treatment. Acta Radiol. 36 (1995), 9.
   Google Scholar
• CIRAY I., ASTRöM G., ANDREASSON I. et al.: Evaluation of new sclerotic bone metastases in breast cancer patients dur-ing treatment. Acta Radiol. 41 (2000), 178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLEMAN R. E. & RUBENS R. D.: The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 55 (1987), 61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COOMBES R. C., DADY P, PARSONS C. et al.: Assessment of response of bone metastases to systemic treatment in pa-tients with breast cancer. Cancer 52 (1983), 610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEMERS L. M., COSTA L., CHINCHILLI V. M., GAYDOS L., CURLEY E. & LIPTON A.: Biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with metastatic bone disease. Clin. Chem. 41 (1995), 1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLICKINGER F. W & SANAL S. M.: Bone marrow MRI. Techniques and accuracy for detecting breast cancer meta-stases. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12 (1994), 829.
   Google Scholar
• GOSFIELD E. D., ALAVI A. & KNEELAND B.: Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases. J. Nucl. Med. 34 (1993), 2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JONES K. M., UNGER E. C., GRANSTROM P, SEEGER J. E, CARMODY R. F. & YOSHINO M.: Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 (1992), 169.
   Google Scholar
• KATTAPURAM S. V, KHURANA J. S., SCOTT J. A. & EL-KHOURY G. Y.: Negative scintigraphy with positive mag-netic resonance imaging in bone metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 19 (1990), 113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIBSHITZ H. I. & HORTOBAGYI G. N.: Radiographic evalu-ation of therapeutic response in bony metastases of breast cancer. Skeletal Radiol. 7 (1981), 159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIEN H. H. & HOLTE H.: Fat replacement of Hodgkin dis-ease of bone marrow after chemotherapy. Report of three cases. Skeletal Radiol. 25 (1996), 671.
   Google Scholar
• MEHTA R. C., MARKS M. R, HINKS R. S., GLOVER G. H. & ENZMANN D. R.: MR evaluation of vertebral metastases. Ti-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery, fast spin-echo, and inversion-recovery fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR 16 (1995), 281.
   Google Scholar
• MEHTA R. C., WILSON M. A. & PERLMAN S. B.: False-nega-tive bone scan in extensive metastatic disease. CT and MR findings. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 13 (1989), 717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER A. B., HOOGSTRATEN B., STAQUET M. & WINKLER A.: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47 (1981), 207.
   Google Scholar
• MIROWITZ S. A., APICELLA R, REINUS W. R. & HAMMER-MAN A. M.: MR imaging of bone marrow lesions. Relative conspicuousness on Ti-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images. AJR 162 (1994), 215.
   Google Scholar
• PALMER E., HENRIKSON B., McKusicK K., STRAUSS H. W. & HOCHBERG F.: Pain as an indicator of bone meta-stasis. Acta Radiol. 29 (1988), 445.
   Google Scholar
• Pui M. H. & CHANG S. K.: Comparison of inversion recov-ery fast spin-echo (FSE) with T2-weighted fat-saturated FSE and Ti-weighted MR imaging in bone marrow lesion detection. Skeletal Radiol. 25 (1996), 149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROSENTHAL D. I.: Radiologic diagnosis of bone metastases. Cancer 80 (1997), 1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROSSLEIGH M. A., LOVEGROVE E T., REYNOLDS P M., BYRNE M. J. & WHITNEY B. P.: The assessment of response to therapy of bone metastases in breast cancer. Aust. NZ J. Med. 14 (1984), 19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SUGIMURA K., KAJITANI A., OKIZUKA H., SUGIHARA M., MIZUTANI M. & ISHIDA T.: Assessing response to therapy of spinal metastases with gadolinium-enhanced MR im-aging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1(1991), 481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VANEL D., MISSENARD G., LE CESNE A. & GUINEBRETIERE J. M.: Red marrow recolonization induced by growth factors mimicking an increase in tumor volume during preopera-tive chemotherapy. MR study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 21 (1997), 529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. In: Neoplasma. WHO Geneva. Offset Publication 25 (1980), 607.
   Google Scholar