Low-Dose Dental Computed Tomography: Significant Dose Reduction without Loss of Image Quality

References

• Abrahams JJ. Anatomy of the jaw revisited with a dental CT software program. Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:979�90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahat O. Treatment planning, placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int Oral Maxillofac Impl 1993;8:151�61.
   Google Scholar
• Calvalcanti MGP, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MV. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:329�33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:156�64.
   Google Scholar
• Conen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, Pawelzik J, Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12:634�7.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a newgeneration machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:236–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Lenzen H, Puskas Z, Koch AT, Yelbuz TM, Eameri M, et al. Niedrigdosiscomputertomogra-phie des Thorax. Experimentelle und Klinische Unter-suchungen. Radiologe 1996;36:475–82.
   Google Scholar
• Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, Lenzen H, Roos N, Weber A, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 2004;16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekestubbe A, Gro-ndahl K, Gro-ndahl H-G. Quality of preimplant low-dose tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:738–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekestubbe A, Gro-ndahl K, Ekholm S, Johansson P E, Gro-ndahl HhyphenG. Low-dose tomographic techni-ques for dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1996;11:650–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ericson S, Bjerklin K. The dental follicle in normally and ectopical erupting maxillary canines: a computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2001;71:333–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in implant den-tistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:18–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt JG, da Silva FC, Mauricio CL, dos Santos DS. The validation of organ dose calculations using voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo methods applied to point and water immersion sources. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004;108:85–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassebaum DK, Stoller NE, McDavid WD, Goshorn B, et al. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:502–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam WW, Ruprecht A, Jang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomo-graphy and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:42–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lindh C, Petersson A. Radiologic examination for location of the mandiblar canal: a comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:249–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mah JK, Danforth RA, BumannA,HatcherD.Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozzo P. Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andresis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558�64.
   Google Scholar
• Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 1992;185:29�35.
   Google Scholar
• Preda L, Di-Maggio EM, Dore R, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:327�31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preda L, La Fianza A, Di Maggio EM, Dore R, Schifino MR, Campani R, et al. The use of spiral computed tomography in the localization of impacted maxillary canines. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:236�41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustemeyer P, Streubuhr U, Hohn HP, Rustemeyer R, Eich HAT, John-Mikolajewski V, et al. Niedrigdosis Dental-CT. ROEFO 1999;171:130�5.
   Google Scholar
• Santler G, Karcher H, Ruda C. Indications and limitations of three-dimensional models in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:11�16.
   Google Scholar
• Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:41–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorn C, Visser H, Hermann KhyphenP, Alamo L, Funke M, Grabbe E. Dental-CT: BildqualitaTt und Strahlenexposition in AbhaTngigkeit von den Scanparametem. ROEFO 1999;170:137–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasak T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. J Dent Res 2003;82:602–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MYA, Mealey BL, Hallmon WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implant-ology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7: 373–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar