17
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Usefulness of Reversed Display of Soft‐Copy Abdominal Radiographs for Urinary Calculi Detection

, , , , &
Pages 351-356 | Accepted 28 Jan 2004, Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, White B, Begun FP. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1485–90.
  • Fraser RG, Breatnach E, Barnes GT. Digital radio-graphy of the chest: clinical experience with a prototype unit. Radiology 1983;148:1–5.
  • Goo HW, Kim HJ, Song K, Kim EA, Kim KS, Yoon CH, et al. Using edge enhancement to identify subtle findings on soft-copy neonatal chest radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:437–40.
  • Kheddache S, Mansson LG, Angelhed JE, Denbratt L, Gottfridson B, Schlossman D. Digital chest radio-graphy: should images be presented in negative or positive mode? Eur J Radiol 1991;13:151–5.
  • Kim AY, Cho KS, Song KS, Kim JH, Kim JG, Ha HK. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:331–5.
  • Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997;204:27–31.
  • MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Kim T, Giger ML, Chan HP. Digital chest radiography: effect on diag-nostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. Radiology 1988;168:669–73.
  • Oestmann JW, Kushner DC, Bourgouin PM, Llewellyn HJ, Mockbee BW, Greene R. Subtle lung cancers: impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digital chest radiographs. Radiology 1988;167:657–8.
  • Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK, Simons M, Huang HK, Chuang KS, et al. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:443–8.
  • Rosenthal MS, Good WF, Costa-Greco MA, Miketic LM, Eelkema EA, Gur D, et al. The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment. Invest Radiol 1990;25:897–901.
  • Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Pile-Spellman EA, Rubens JR, et al. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Radiology 1991;178:733–8.
  • Sheline ME, Brikman I, Epstein DM, Mezrich JL, Kundel HL, Arenson RL. The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:261–3.
  • Sherrier RH, Chiles C, Wilkinson WE, Johnson GA, Ravin CE. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance. Radiology 1988;66:447–50.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.