Availability, Indications, and Technical Performance of Computed Tomographic Colonography: A National Survey

References

• Burling D., Halligan S., Altman D. G., et al. CT colonography: effect of directed training on reader performance. ESGAR Annual Meeting, Geneva, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Burling D., Halligan S., Atchley J., Dhingsa R., Maskell G., Guest P., et al. CT colonography: interpretative performance outside of a research environment. ESGAR annual meeting, Florence, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Burling D., Halligan S., Taylor S. A., Usiskin S., Bartram C. I. CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 39–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton P. B., Durkalski V. L., Pineau B. C., Palesch Y. Y., Mauldin P. D., Hoffman B., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. J Am Med Assoc 2004; 291: 1713–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachman A. H., Yoshida H. Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 377–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon A. K., Freeman A. H., Coni N. K. CT of the colon in frail elderly patients. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995; 16: 165–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenlon H. M., Nunes D. P., Schroy P. C., Barish M. A., Clarke P. D., Ferrucci J. T. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1496–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrucci J. Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. CT colonography for detection of colon polyps and cancer. Lancet 2005; 365: 1464–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluecker T., Meuwly J. Y., Pescatore P., Schnyder P., Delarive J., Jornod P., et al. Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1405–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. D., MacCarty R. L., Welch T. J., Wilson L. A., Harmsen W. S., Ilstrup D. M., et al. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 314–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. D., Toledano A. Y., Herman B. A., Dachman A. H., McFarland E. G., Barish M. A., et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 688–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone R., Laghi A., Catalano C., Brink J. A., Mangiapane F., Trenna S., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003; 229: 775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macari M., Berman P., Dicker M., Milano A., Megibow A. J. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 561–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelson R., Ramsay D., Edwards J., Forbes G. Virtual colonoscopy: issues in implementation. Australas Radiol 2005; 49: 8–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrin M. M., Farrell R. J., Raptopoulos V., McGee J. B., Bleday R., Kruskal J. B. Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 303–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri E., Giusti P., Battolla L., Vagli P., Boraschi P., Lencioni R., et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223: 615–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescatore P., Glucker T., Delarive J., Meuli R., Pantoflickova D., Duvoirsin B., et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000; 47: 126–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickhardt P. J., Choi J. R., Hwang I., Butler J. A., Puckett M. L., Hildebrandt H. A., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 4;349((23))2191–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockey D. C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., Davis W., Bosworth H. B., Sanders L., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365((9456))305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosna J., Morrin M. M., Kruskal J. B., Farrell R. J., Nasser I., Raptopoulos V. Colorectal neoplasms: role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Radiology 2003; 228: 152–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S. A., Halligan S., Burling D., Bassett P., Bartram C. I. Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 207–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S. A., Halligan S., Saunders B. P., Bassett P., Vance M., Bartram C. I. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 913–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee J., Akerkar G. A., Hung R. K., Steinauer-Gebauer A. M., Wall S. D., McQuaid K. R. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 685–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar