Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomographic Colonography: A Prospective Comparison with Colonoscopy

References

• Arnesen R. B., Adamsen S., Svendsen L. B., Raaschou H. O., von Benzon E., Hansen O. H. Missed lesions and false-positive findings on computed-tomographic colonography: a controlled prospective analysis. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 937–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen R. B., von Benzon E., Hansen O. H., Svendsen L. B., Raaschou H. O., Adamsen S. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations. Acta Radiol, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensen S., Mott L. A., Dain B., Rothstein R. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 194–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs A. H., Gray A. M. Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3: 1–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burling D., Halligan S., Slater A., Noakes M. J., Taylor S. A. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239: 464–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond M. F., ÓBrien B., Stoddart G. L., Torrance G. W. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd ed. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1997
   Google Scholar
• Durkalski V. L., Pineau B. C., Palesch Y. Y., Mauldin P. D., Hoffman B., Vining D. J. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy). A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 1713–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenlon H. M., Nunes D. P., Schroy P. C III., Barish M. A., Clarke P. D., Ferrucci J. T. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1496–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher J. G., Johnson C. D., Welch T. J., MacCarty R. L., Ahlquist D. A., Reed J. E., et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216: 704–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginnerup Pedersen B., Rosenkilde M., Christiansen T. E., Laurberg S. Extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. Gut 2003; 52: 1744–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginnerup Pedersen B., Christiansen T. E., Bjerregaard N. C., Ljungmann K., Laurberg S. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 736–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg S. N., Blachar A., Amitai M., Barmeir E., Peled N., Goldberg S. N., et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006; 239: 457–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara A. K., Johnson C. D., MacCarty R. L., Welch T. J., McCollough C. H., Harmsen W. S. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001; 219: 461–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara A. K., Johnson C. D., Reed J. E., Ahlquist D. A., Nelson H., MacCarty R. L., et al. Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colonography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 1997; 205: 59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone R., Laghi A., Catalano C., Brink J. A., Mangiapane F., Trenna S., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003; 229: 775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg G. A., Ginsberg G. G., Barkun A. N., Bosco J. J., Nguyen C. C., Petersen B. T., et al. Technology status evaluation report. Virtual colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 451–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentschura D., Raute M., Winter J., Henkel T., Kraus M., Manegold B. C. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 672–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. D., Harmsen W. S., Wilson L. A., Maccarty R. L., Wlech T. J., Ilst D. M., et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of CT colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 311–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macari M., Bini E. J., Jacobs S. L., Naik S., Lui Y. W., Milano A., et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 2004; 230: 629–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath J. S., Ponich T. P., Gregor J. C. Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2902–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendeleson R. M., Foster N. M., Edwards J. T., Wood C. J., Rosenberg M. S., Forbes G. M. Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy: a developing technology. Med J Austr 2000; 173: 472–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickhardt P. J., Choi J. R., Hwang I., Butler J. A., Puckett M. D., Hildebrandt H. A., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineau B. C., Paskett E. D., Chen G. J., Espeland M. A., Phillips K., Han J. P., et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 304–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex D. K., Cutler C. S., Lemmel G. T., Rahmani E. Y., Clark D. W., Helper G. A., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 292–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex D. K., Vining D. J., Kopecky K. K. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 309–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockey D. C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., Davis W., Bosworth H. B., Sanders L., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg A., Delcò F., Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2268–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg F. A., Beck J. R. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993; 13: 332–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinzi G., Belloni G., Martegani A., Sangiovanni A., Del Favero C., Minoli G. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 394–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining D. J. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 104
   Google Scholar
• Winawer S. J., Stewart E. T., Zauber A. G., Bond J. H., Ansel H., Waye J. D., et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1766–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee J., Akerkar G. A., Hung R. K., Steinauer-Gebauer A. M., Wall S. D., McQuaid K. R. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 685–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar