References
- Bagg M. N. J., Horwitz T. A., Bester L. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously. AJR 1986; 147: 185
- Brismar J., Jacobsson B. F., Jorulf H. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low- versus high-osmolality contrast media. A study revised. Radiology 1991; 179: 19
- Cohan R. H., Dunnick N. R. Intravascular contrast media. Adverse reactions. AJR 1987; 149: 665
- Cohen M. D. Choosing contrast media for the evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract of neonates and infants. Radiology 1987; 162: 447
- Dawson P. Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects. A review. Invest. Radiol 1985; S84, Suppl. 20
- Fischer H. W. Catalog of intravascular contrast media. Radiology 1986; 159: 561
- Jacobsson B. F., Jorulf H., Kalantar M. S., Narasimham D. L. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography. Clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients. Radiology 1988; 167: 601
- Kinnison M. L., Powe N. R., Steinberg E. P. Results of randomized controlled trials of low- versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 1989; 170: 381
- McClennan B. L. Low-osmolality contrast media. Premises and promises. Radiology 1987; 162: 1
- Manhire A. R., Dawson P., Dennet R. Contrast agent-induced emesis. Clin. Radiol 1984; 35: 369
- Skalpe I. O. Enhancement with water soluble contrast media in computed tomography of the brain and abdomen. Acta Radiol 1983; 72, Suppl. 366