Viscosity of Some Contemporary Contrast Media before and after Mixing with Whole Blood

References

• Almén T. Contrast agent design. Some aspects of the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J. Theor. Biol 1969; 24: 216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspelin P. Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on morphology of human erythrocytes. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1978; 19: 675
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aspelin P. Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and hematocrit in vitro. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1978; 19: 977
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berenson M. L., Levine D. M., Goldstein M. Intermediate statistical methods and applications. A computer package approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1983
   Google Scholar
• Björk L. Effect of angiocardiography on erythrocyte aggregation in the conjunctival vessels. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1967; 6: 459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk L., Erikson U., Holtz A. Delivery rates of certain contrast media through catheters for angiography and cardioangiography. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1971; 11: 586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Björk L., Erikson U., Ingelman B. Preliminary report on angiography with polymeric contrast agents in rabbits and dogs. Ups. J. Med. Sci 1976; 81: 183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro C. G., Pedley T. J., Schroter R. C., Seed W. A. The mechanics of the circulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1978
   Google Scholar
• Cokelet G. R. The rheology and tube flow of blood. Handbook of bioengineering, R. Skalak, S. Chien. McGraw-Hill, New York 1987; 14
   Google Scholar
• Dawson P., Howell M. The non-ionic dimers. A new class of contrast agents. Br. J. Radiol 1986; 59: 987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst E., Monshausen C., Matrai A. Blood viscosity – a comparative study in three rotational viscometers. Biorheology 1985; 22: 471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H. W. Viscosity, solubility and toxicity in the choice of an angiographic contrast medium. Angiology 1965; 16: 759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H. W. Catalog of intravascular contrast media. Radiology 1986; 159: 561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkow B., Neil E. Circulation. Oxford University Press, London 1971; 26
   Google Scholar
• Grollman J. R. The importance of preheating contrast media. AJR 1984; 142: 391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsell R. D. Heating contrast media. Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology 1987; 164: 276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey G. B., Smith K. R. Chemistry of X-ray contrast media. Radiocontrast agents, M. Sovak. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1984; 123
   Google Scholar
• Krovetz L. J., Fairchild B. T., Hardin S., Mitchell B. An analysis of factors determining delivery rates of liquids through cardiac catheters. Radiology 1966; 86: 123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren P., Löfström B., Saltzman G. F. Intravascular erythrocyte aggregation after intravenous injection of contrast media. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1964; 2: 334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lloyd D. A., Stein J. S., Rowe M. I. The effect of a hyperosmolar intravenous contrast medium on blood viscosity. Invest. Radiol 1991; 26: 220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris T. W., Kern M. A., Katzberg R. W. The effects of media viscosity on hemodynamics in selective arteriography. Invest. Radiol 1982; 17: 70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raininko R., Ylinen S.-L. Effect of non-ionic contrast media on aggregation of red blood cells in vitro. Acta Radiol 1987; 28: 87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand P. W., Lacombe E. Hemodilution, tonicity, and blood viscosity. J. Clin. Invest 1964; 43: 2214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand P. W., Lacombe E. Effects of angiocardiographic injections on blood viscosity. Radiology 1965; 85: 1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhagen B. Analysis of haemorheological variables - methodology and reference values. Ups. J. Med. Sci 1989; 94: 81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Schönbein H., Teitel P., Malotta H., Özlen A., Tietz G. Einfluss eines nicht-ionischen Röntgenkontrastmittels (Iopamidol) auf die Mikrorheologie des Blutes. Röntgenpraxis 1983; 36: 421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stäubli M., Braunschweig J., Tillmann U. Changes in the rheological properties of blood as induced by sodium/meglumine ioxaglate compared with sodium/meglumine diatrizoate and metrizamide. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1982; 23: 71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strecker E. P., Stengel M., Witte S. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) X-ray contrast medium of haemorheology. Recent developments in nonionic contrast media, V. Taenzer, S. Wende. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1989; 24
   Google Scholar
• Strickland N. H., Dawson F., Rampling M. W. Blood viscosity changes induced by radiocontrast agents. Br. J. Radiol 1990; 63: 987
   Google Scholar