Film-Screen Vs. Digital Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand

References

• Allander E., Forsgren P. O., Pettersson H., Seideman P. Computerized assessment of radiological changes of the hand in rheumatic diseases. Scand. J. Rheumatol 1989; 18: 291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume H., Kamiya K. Auto-ranging and normalization versus histogram modifications for automatic image processing of digital radiographs. SPIE Med. Imaging 1987; 767: 371
   Google Scholar
• Bramble J. M., Murphey M. D. Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography. Observer performance study. Radiology 1990; 177: 587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckwalter K. A., Braunstein E. M. Digital skeletal radiography. AJR 1992; 158: 1071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannatempo G. M., Bonetti M. G., Guglielmi G., Cammisa M. Preliminary experience of the study of the hand using digital radiology with photoexcitable phosphorus and direct magnification. Comparison with the traditional high resolution technique. Radiol. Med. (Torino) 1990; 80: 649
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kangarloo H., Boechat M. I., Barbaric Z., et al. Two-year clinical experience with a computed radiography system. AJR 1988; 151: 605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz C. E. Applications of ROC analysis in diagnostic image evaluation. The physics of medical imaging. Recording system measurements and technique, A. G. Haus. American Institute of Physics, New York 1979; 546
   Google Scholar
• Metz C. E. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest. Radiol 1986; 21: 720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz C. E. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest. Radiol 1989; 24: 234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan J. H., Huang H. K. B., Bramble J. M., Siegel E. L. Digital radiography. Invest. Radiol 1989; 24: 735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphey M. D. Digital skeletal radiography. Spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption. AJR 1989; 152: 541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphey M. D., Bramble J. M., Cook L. T., Martin N. L., Dwyer S. J., III. Nondisplaced fractures. Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 1990; 174: 865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphey M. D., Bramble J. M., Cox G. G., McMillan J. H., Dwyer S. J., III, Harvey P. C. Experience in the use of an image-processing workstation for a photostimulable phosphor radiographic system. J. Digital Imaging 1990; 3: 60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphey M. D., Huang H. K. B., Siegel E. L., Hillman B. J., Bramble J. M. Clinical experience in the use of photostimulable phosphor radiographic systems. Invest. Radiol 1991; 26: 590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphey M. D., Quale J. L., Martin N. L., Bramble J. M., Cook L. T., Dwyer S. J., III. Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging. State of the art. AJR 1992; 158: 19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson H., Aspelin P., Boijsen E., Herrlin K., Egund N. Digital radiography of the spine, large bones and joints using stimulable phosphor. Acta Radiol 1988; 29: 267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop M., Galanski M., Oestmann J. W., et al. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography. Effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects. Radiology 1990; 177: 109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop M., Schaefer C., Oestmann J. W., Meschede A., Reichelt S., Galanski M. Optimal parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs, H. U. Lemke, et al. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1991; 149, Proc. Comput. Assist. Radiol.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick D., Niwayama G. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders, 2nd edn. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia 1988
   Google Scholar
• Richmond B. J., Powers C., Piraino D. W., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of digitized images vs. plain films. A study of the joints of the fingers. AJR 1992; 158: 437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda M., Takano M., Miyahara J., Kato H. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 1983; 148: 833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegryn S. A., Piraino D. W., Richmond B. J., et al. Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography. An observer performance study. Radiology 1990; 175: 225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz W., Buitrago-Tellez C., Blum U., et al. Digitalisierung konventioneller Röntgenaufnahmen. Radiologe 1992; 32: 409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson A. J., Mann F. A., Murphy W. A., Jr., Monsees B. S., Linn M. R. Photostimulable phosphor digital radiography of the extremities. Diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional radiography. AJR 1991; 157: 533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar