Effect of Iopentol on Renal Function and Its Use for Calculation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Children

References

• Andrew E., Sveen K., Lambrecths M., Lillevold P. E. Total iopentol profile – overall results from clinical trials. Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium, F. Lærum, B. Kendall. Excerpta Medica, Int. Congr. Series, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1990; vol. 909: 189
   Google Scholar
• Berg K. J., Jakobsen J. Å. Nephrotoxicity related to contrast media. Patient safety and adverse events in contrast medium examinations, I. Enge, J. Edgren. Excerpta Medica, Int. Congr. Series, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989; vol. 816: 111
   Google Scholar
• Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; iii: 307
   Google Scholar
• Iopentol. Chemistry, toxicology and pharmacology of a non-ionic contrast medium. Acta Radiol. 1987, Suppl. 370, Boijsen E., Kormano M. (editors)
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner-Mortensen J. A simple method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 30: 271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøchner-Mortensen J., Haahr J., Christoffersen J. A simple method for accurate assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in children. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1974; 33: 139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönberg T., Sjöberg S., Almén T., Golman K., Mattsson S. Noninvasive estimation of kidney function by X-ray fluorescence analysis. Elimination rate and clearance of contrast media injected for urography in man. Invest. Radiol. 1983; 18: 445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haycock G. B., Schwartz G. J., Wisotsky D. H. Geometric method for measuring body surface area. A height-weight formula validated in infants, children and adults. J. Pediatr. 1978; 93: 62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Berg K. J., Waaler A., Andrew E. Renal effects of the non-ionic contrast medium iopentol after intravenous injection in healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol. 1990; 31: 87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Kolbenstvedt A. N., Berg K. J. Renal effects of iopentol and iohexol after intravenous injection. Acta Radiol. 1991; 32: 320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. G., Dance N., Richards B., Cattell W. R. The excretion of N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and β-galactosidase following surgery to the kidney. Clin. Chim. Acta 1970; 27: 65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen F., Dyreborg U., Larsen C., Waaler A., Kristoffersen D. T. Intravenous urography with a new non-ionic contrast medium in a clinical phase III study. Iopentol vs. iohexol. Clin. Radiol. 1990; 41: 37
   Google Scholar
• Rootwelt K., Falch D., Sjøkvist R. Determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by analysis of capillary blood after single shot injection of 99mTc-DTPA. A comparison with simultaneous 125I-iothalamate GFR estimation showing equal GFR but difference in distribution volume. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1980; 5: 97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sapirstein L. A., Vidt D. G., Mandel M. J., Hanusek G. Volumes of distribution and clearances of intravenously injected creatinine in the dog. Am. J. Physiol. 1955; 181: 330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sortland O., Johansen J. G., Øksendal A. N., Waaler A. Iopentol in urography. A clinical comparison between iopentol and metrizoate including delayed reactions. Acta Radiol. 1992; 33: 368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake G., Montclair T. A single plasma sample method for estimation of the glomerular filtration rate in infants and children using iohexol. I, establishment of a body weight-related formula for the distribution volume of iohexol. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1991; 51: 335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stake G., Monn E., Rootwelt K., Grönberg T., Montclair T. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by X-ray fluorescence technique in children. Comparison between the plasma disappearance of 99mTc-DTPA and iohexol after urography. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1990; 50: 161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar