References
- Alfidi R. J., Haaga J., Meaney T., et al. Computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen. A preliminary report. Radiology 1975; 117: 257
- Berland L. L., Lawson T. L., Foley W. D., et al. Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. AJR 1982; 138: 853
- Bernardino M., Erwin B., Steinberg H., et al. Delayed hepatic CT scanning. Increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases. Radiology 1986; 159: 71
- Bressler E., Alpern M., Glazer G., Francis I., Ensminger W. Hypervascular hepatic metastases. CT evaluation. Radiology 1987; 162: 49
- Burgener F. A., Hamlin D. J. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT. Comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. AJR 1983; 140: 291
- Claussen C. D., Banzer D., Pfretzschner C., Kalender W. A., Schörner W. Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology 1984; 153: 356
- Dean P. B., Kivisaari L., Kormano M. Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and nonionic contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 1983; 18: 368
- Foley W. D., Beröamd L. L., Lawson T. L., Smith D. F., Thorsen M. K. Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning. Radiology 1983; 147: 797
- Halvorsen R. A., Dunnick N. R., Thompson W. M. Contrast agent enhancement in abdominal computed tomography. Ionic vs nonionic agent. Invest. Radiol. 1984; 239, Suppl
- Jensen L. I., Golman K., Nyman U., Dean P. B. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig. Invest. Radiol. 1985; 20: 989
- Kormano M., Partanen K., Soimakallio S., Krvimäki T. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen. Effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest. Radiol. 1983; 18: 364
- Nelson R. C., Chezmar J. L., Peterson J. E., Bernardino M. E. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. AJR 1989; 153: 973
- Nelson R. C., Moyers J. H., Chezmar J. L., et al. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT. Section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 1991; 178: 499
- Partanen K., Kormano M., Kivimäki T., Soimakallio S. Comparison of iohexol and metrizamide in dynamic CT of the upper abdomen. Eur. J. Radiol. 1984; 4: 227
- Robbins A. H., Thurm R. H., Yeh T. Computed body tomography with iopamidol. Invest. Radiol. Suppl. 1984; 234
- Sager E. M., Scheel B., Talle K. Increased delegability of liver metastases by the use of contrast enhancement in computed tomography. A comparison between the precontrast, the immediate postcontrast and the one hour postcontrast scan. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1985; 26: 369
- Singer A. A., Tagliabue J. R., Paushter D. M., Borkowski G. P., Einstein D. M. Comparison of iohexol-240 versus iohexol-300 in abdominal CT. Gastrointest. Radiol. 1992; 17: 122
- Skalpe I. O. Enhancement with water soluble contrast media in computed tomography in the brain and abdomen. Survey and present state. Acta Radiol. 1983, Suppl. 366: 72
- Tidebrant G., Lukes P., Tylén U. Contrast enhancement of liver parenchyma and biliary tract related to liver function at delayed computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 1990; 31: 265